Sandra L. Jacobson Case Summary

Improved Essays
In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program. After the day’s proceedings, the court warned …show more content…
Jacobson arguing that the court had abused its discretionary powers when it did not allow Jacobson’s attorney’s to poll the jury, and instead assumed that the jurors had abided by the restrictions placed on them to avoid news reports. The due process clause guarantees everyone the right to a trial by an impartial jury, and this was denied to Sandra L. Jacobson when public broadcasting was clearly impartial towards the prosecution, and the jurors had the means to watch said report, which would render them biased. Legally, if there is the possibility that jurors may have been exposed to material that is prejudicial, then an appellate court should be able to gauge the exposure and determine the prejudice of the jury. The trial court was able to determine that unfair prejudice from this broadcasting station, including information that would be inadmissible in trial and would therefore contaminate the jury. Several cases have shown that warnings alone do not neutralize the potential for jury contamination, so a trial court should not rely solely on the warnings it gives jurors. The court concluded that the “error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt” and therefore revoked her conviction but placed Jacobson in custody for a new trial on her

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the appellate Division reversed and remanded. Facts: Howard D. Brunson was accused and sued for…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Resultantly, the verdict of the original trial was overturned and it was ordered that a retrial take…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With more than 14 years' experience in the fields of family and personal injury law, Thomas K. Mallon of The Law Office of Thomas K. Mallon, LLC, proudly serves the residents of Baltimore, Anne Arundel, and Harford Counties. When you enlist the legal expertise of this respected family attorney, you can be confident you are receiving the highest levels of professional, compassionate, and attentive representation. Whether you're going through a divorce, a child support issue, or a personal injury matter, Attorney Mallon is here for you. Background: Thomas K. Mallon received his Juris Doctor from the University of Baltimore School of Law in 1999.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Zieva Konvisser, a professor at Wayne State University, who conducted the interview with the defendant, Ms. Julie Baumer examined the psychological, emotional, and family impacts revolving around Ms. Baumer case. This interview was conducted for an emotional standpoint, and it gave insight on how the family felt as well as how Ms. Baumer reaction throughout the entire process. Ms. Baumer came from a large family and was raised Catholic, she was living the American dream and was a loan officer before the situation even occurred. In the interview, Julie elaborated on how she felt throughout the process and how it was a nightmare, despite the hardship Julie kept her faith and she had support from her family.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case, Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83, Certiorari was granted to a decision of the Court of Appeals of Maryland to consider whether petitioner was denied a federal right when the appeals court restricted its grant of a new murder trial to the question of punishment, leaving the determination of guilt undisturbed. The appeals court granted a retrial after holding that suppression of evidence by the state violated petitioner's rights under the Due Process Clause, U.S. Constitutional Amendment XIV (Law School Case Briefs, 2013). Furthermore, there was a judgement that had granted the petitioner a new murder trial that was solely based on the issue of his punishment. Since the petitioner was convicted of murder and then sentenced to death in his first trail with the Maryland Court, the petitioner was then informed that the Maryland Courts had withheld a statement that indicated that another individual had admitted that exact homicide. What the Supreme Court had concluded from this case was that, because of the suppression of the evidence was in favorable to an accused upon the request that violated the Due Process Clause required the court to a…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a result the jury had a preconceived idea of his character, likewise, the Azaria Chamberlin v R case in which Lindy Chamberlin was assumed guilty due to her emotionless appearance, comparable to Baden-Clay (Networked Knowledge Law Reports, Nd). Therefore, his right to a fair trial was sacrificed through the jury; however the judge and legal counsels have the position and expertise to apply law beyond public sentiment, ensuring Baden-Clay was sentenced justly disregarding the extensive media coverage. The right to a fair trial is a highly important aspect to the justice system as it allows equality and predictability (News.com.au, 2015). Consequently, in the case of Baden-Clay this is ultimately a strength of the justice system as the prosecution successfully issued an appropriate murder conviction through the influence of the media on the jury. The Australian justice system generally upholds the rights of the accused to a high standard in which, Australian citizens are guaranteed a fair and just trial.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nancy Ellis Case Summary

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    EREPORT # 19225 stated the following: Nancy Ellis reported that the incident happened when Chance was three years old. His biological father broke both of Chances's arms when he was drunk while she was at work. Nancy Ellis did not report any other abuse by the father. Nancy Ellis reported it to the nurse upon Chances admission to the Acute program. The nurse completed an allegation of abuse form and submitted it to me on 2/20/2016.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Blake V. Ferguson Case

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Whether the trial court erred when it denied Mr. Blake's motion to suppress, because the pretrial identification procedure was so impermissible suggestive that there is a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. Whether the trial court erred when it overruled Mr. Blake's objection to Ms. Olsen's and Mr. Klein's in-court identification of him, because it was tainted by the improper pretrial identification and inherently incredible. II. ISSUE II Did the lower tribunal violated the constitutional rights of Mr. Blake and the jurors because the court erred in allowing the State Attorney to raise discriminatory peremptory challenge based on racial and gender grounds?…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1997, the Texas legislature enacted a law requiring all public universities in Texas to admit all high school seniors who ranked in the top ten percent of their high school’s graduating class. The University of Texas at Austin, after finding disparities between the racial and ethnic makeup of the university's undergraduate population and the state's population, decided to modify its race-neutral admissions policy. The new policy continued to admit all in-state students who graduated in the top ten percent of their high school classes, however, for the remainder of the in-state freshman class the university would consider race as a factor for admissions into the university. The plaintiff, Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for undergraduate admission to the University of Texas in 2008.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Middlebury Case Summary

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Middlebury struggle session. (2017, Apr 25). Wall Street Journal Retrieved from http://rdas-proxy.mercy.edu:2048/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.rdas-proxy.mercy.edu/docview/1891314915?accountid=12387 In this article based on Charles Murray Middlebury case, Bert Johnson, chair of Middlebury political science department apologized for the violent student’s behavior. Johnson apologized in the campus newspaper.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the court decided the precise terms of the restraining order are important because the court deems the Nebraska Supreme Court’s term “strongly implicative” vague and overly broad. There was no evidence to show that these measures as opposed to other less restrictive measures would better ensure a free trial. The court also points out that this crime occur in a very small town where it was likely to have news spread even without the publication or broadcasting of information. Also, the information had an immediate impact on this community, which means that have the right to know. Concurring Opinions: Justice Brennan, with Justice Stewart and Justice Marshall concurring, expresses his opinion that it is impermissible to use Prior Restraints to ensure a fair trial because it is wrong to infringe on one right to protect another.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This can be a very bad thing if you choose a jury because everyone knows that the media stretches the truth. As Mark Twain wrote, “Of course the papers were full of it, and all men capable of reading, read about it” (Twain, Roughing It, 1872). The media is a money maker, and they will use all they can to get their money. If the jurors just occasionally read the newspaper and stubble upon the case, it might influence there decision. If the defendant chooses the bench trial, they will get a judge who is no influenced by the media, xenophobic, or religious about that…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fields Vs Fields

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is the Supreme Court opinion on the case of United States v. Fields. Abel Fields, a resident of California, is being tried for violating the Stolen Valor Act which was signed into law in 2006. I will be reviewing this cases and cases like it to better determine a decision. In 2011, Abel Fields attended a city meeting about public safety.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Run Away Jury Essay

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The civil and criminal justice system in America relies heavily on juries in deciding a person’s guilt, innocence, or even determining whether a specific party should be held negligent for a particular action or inaction. Jurors are summoned to serve on a jury in the community which they live. Lawyers want citizens to serve on a jury who can listen to facts and come to a conclusion based on the facts put on at trial. Jurors are supposed to be unbiased in a case; however, that is not always the case.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays