Jury Nullification In The Justice System

Superior Essays
The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.
The Canadian justice system should recognize jury nullification in any case where there are harassment
…show more content…
There is cases that are presented that are not necessarily justifiable to what the law says its right and wrong and there can be many factors that play into why a certain individual in a special case may not be guilty even though there is clear evidence that the crime was committed. It gives the jury a chance to plug in the factors of who, what, where, when and why and to treat each case as its own. Having the responsibility to use your own judgment holds great potential in a jury system as well as having a wide variety of people from different backgrounds leads to having a wide variety of opinions in a …show more content…
An example of this can be where a violent crime is committed by a police officer against a citizen and the individual committing the crime is deemed not guilty. Another example of where jury nullification can be vital is in a case where a police officer is inappropriately touching a woman and the women lashes out against the officer and is then charged with assaulting an officer. A jury can nullify the factors that come into play and can consider the fact that the police officer did inappropriately touch this woman and she does not deserve to be judged guilty for her actions. She is no harm to the public community but the police officer is thus deeming her innocent. Jury nullification does have potential and good intentions but there are two sides to it, it also can create potential dangers to the justice system as it has its flaws.
Racially based jury nullification has been an ongoing issue and debate for a considerable amount of time in the jury system. Even though jury nullification also has great potential to produce good outcomes and provide a defendant with a sense of equality, it can also bring in a lot of inequality and potential danger to disrupt the justice

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Simpson trial demonstrated racial attitudes on issues such as law enforcement that still exists in our country. It may be that, more than anything, that the trial will be remembered because of the racism. But it also had other effects. It created a greater awareness…

    • 2536 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This made colonists highly upset, which would be one of the leading causes of the American Revolution. When the original members of the constitutional convention wrote the Bill of Rights, they understood how important it was to have a fair court system, so they made sure that the right to have a trial by jury was an official law of the United States. The 7th Amendment states: 'In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States,…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, when the prosecution does the exact same, then it is seen as mere execution of judicial powers. But there is no suggestion why one is better than the other, besides the fact that prosecutors are more susectible to corruption as opposed to everyday people who come together in the court for a single case (Somin, 2015, para. 2, ad 3). The author implies that the Founders placed such power in peoples hands to keep the government in check and make sure it does not exercise more power than it actually has. Consequently, the criminal and civil laws that are exercised in modern days might confuse jury members themselves. That is, there are crimes which should not be illegal at all or carry much lesser penalties, hence, jury nullification is more possible in these instances, rather than in broadly accepted…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ringo V. State (1986)

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (1946) that decided, “the color of a man’s skin is unrelated to his fitness as a juror.” This leads to the Batson v. Kentucky (1986) case of 1986 that “Purposeful racial discrimination in selection of the venire violates a defendant’s right to equal protection because it denies him the protection that a trial by jury is intended to secure.” This led to decision that the detective’s interrogation technique goes against those statues and prior court decisions. The court then points out the dangers of purposeful racial discrimination in the justice system and referenced the case of Powers v. Ohio, 1999 stating, “…racial discrimination has no place in the courtroom.” Then further with the case of Addison v. State (Ind. 2012) with “create a system where all citizens are equal in the eyes of the law.”…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most examples jury nullification provided seem to be in cases of little significance, like the minor drug charges described by Paul Butler. Overall her podcast provides good arguments and insights for the positives and…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be virtuous means to have high moral standards; to be righteous and honorable. Principle is moral rule or belief that helps one distinguish what is right and wrong. To have power means to have the capability to direct or influence the behavior of others. Virtue and principle go hand in hand, virtue requiring a moral compass and principle providing that said compass, but is that what’s most important? Being morally responsible?…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, the purpose of jury sequestration is to isolate the jury once deliberation have commenced with the evidence presented in court and shield them from being influenced by outside sources, such as social media. By the time jury deliberation commence, the jury might already be exposed to enough outside sources to influence their judgment. Hence, the question under consideration in this essay is whether the jury should be sequestered for the duration of the trial. This essay argues that jury sequestration for the duration of the trial is not a viable solution to shelter the jury from the influence of social media. Sequestration for the duration of the trial would impose unnecessary burden on the jurors and monetary costs on the government.…

    • 1890 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first is through statues, the second through jury instructions and the third through the allowance of nullification arguments by defense council. In 2012 New Hampshire passed a statute that allowed the “defense to inform the jury of its right to judge the facts and the application of the law in relation to the facts in controversy” (Fully). The legislature was careful in the text of the bill about its intent “to perpetuate and reiterate the rights of the jury, as ordained under common law and recognized in the American jurisprudence”…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A reason that supports the idea of scrapping the jury system is the lack of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As citizens are selected for jury duty, many of them may have experienced racial profiling and have a negative perception of the judicial system. The danger of having a negative perception is a bias toward law enforcement which leads to a subjective view of the facts of a case that is presented. Jurors who have experienced racial profiling maybe inclined to be more compassionate towards a criminal who otherwise should have been found guilty. These types of situations erode at the foundation of the judicial system, causing a further breakdown in trust. The foundation of the judicial system is based on honesty, trust, and integrity.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Trial by ‘a jury of one’s peers’ should be a more often occurring event, in which the bias a judge produces naturally would be avoided. Such a solution would be much better than the system we follow now in which we completely conceal the fact that African Americans still face discrimination and unlawful…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics