Nowadays, juries are changing discretely to accommodate juror’s rights. Assumptions about race and other factors are being replaced with factual information about the person as an individual found on social media websites like Facebook and Twitter. The Five- Factor Model of Personality helps to determine whether someone is a suitable candidate for a specific jury or not. The five factors it includes are neuroticism, extraversion, …show more content…
On the opposite side of the spectrum, Extraversion is defined as a person’s ability to demonstrate outgoing traits socially. This subset of individuals is inclined to be happier and are recommended as suitable jurors. Openness is the admiration of alternate perspectives and the impulse to experience artistic pleasures. People who have a high openness perspective are good jurors because they think outside the box and are flexible with their emotions. Unlike high openness, low openness is a characteristic that isn’t wanted in a juror because it leads people to have difficulty with adapting to new ideas or feelings. Agreeableness is the likelihood of somebody being reliable and sympathetic towards others while Conscientiousness is the likelihood to plan ahead and be diligent. Individuals that have a high agreeableness perspective would be picked as a presentable juror because they have a strong positive view of relationships while low agreeableness tend to be more antagonistic. A person who has a high conscientiousness perspective demonstrates hard work and strong decision making skills while low conscientiousness is very lazy and are most likely to not be chosen as an appropriate juror. The Five- Factor Model of Personality helps to investigate and peel the underlying layers of a potential juror’s profile to see who they are as person and what their