• Home Page
  • Jury Trial Advantages And Disadvantages

Jury Trial Advantages And Disadvantages

Improved Essays
Show More
Register to read the introduction… | |
| |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror |
|Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. |
|to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | |
|Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. |
|random selection. | |
|95% of cases dealt with by magistrates, so not a great cost as a |Expense of jury trial. |
|percentage spent of the CJ system. | …show more content…
|
|Common sense; judge strength of witnesses' evidence themselves. |Are mislead by barristers' techniques as to strength of evidence. |
|Apply common values, e.g. what is "dishonest" |Judge has to explain legal matters. |
|Majority verdicts allow justice when there is a 'rogue' juror. |Majority verdicts can convict when there is doubt which should have been |
| |given to the defendant. |
|Many judges believe jurors usually return the right verdict, very few|Easily influenced by impressive barristers, or the judge. …show more content…
|Insufficient intellect. Cannot follow complicated tax or fraud cases. |
| |Note: can be judge-only trial in some cases. |
|Provide a barometer of public opinion. |Inconsistencies throughout the country. |
| | |
| |Young jurors no life experience. |
|Ordinary honest citizens applying local knowledge and values. |Jury members can have a string of convictions not serious enough to |
| |disqualify. |
|Reputed to do their best according to the law. |

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Essay
    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury System Dbq Essay

    When the jurors are “placed in a cramped box and held up there for days or even weeks at a time” (Document B), then their decision may be slightly different due to their boredom and/or want to leave. This may not always be a problem; however, I know that if I was trapped there and not allowed to leave until the jury came to a decision, then I might just throw in the towel of what I actually believe and just go with the majority vote. Another reason that this example verdict may not be correct is judges have a “reasoned and professional judgment” (Document B), but I cannot say the same for juries. A jury is by no means professional, as they are random citizens that know from a range of nothing about law or omniscient about law. This is proven by cartoon 1 of Document where near three-fourths of the jury are focusing on something other than the trial (Document…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    Over the years, jury systems have precedent the way we reach a verdict based on the trial. Moreover, it has been proven that jury systems have shaped Americans to be self-governors (Document B). Evidence shows that in a twelve month period bench trials have only 65 percent of criminals that have been convicted and 87 percent of criminals have been convicted in jury trials (Document A). This proves that jury systems are able to prosecute more and deliver more justice than bench trials. To begin, I support jury systems based on open minded peers reaching a verdict, prevention of corruption, and civic participation/knowledge for citizens.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men: Critique Of The Legal System
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men: Critique Of The Legal System

    The majority of the jurors did not follow ‘innocent until proven guilty’, rather, they worked the opposite way. This is due to their personal biases. Under Juror 8’s influence, the men began ’talking for an hour’ using ‘reasonable doubt’, thus allowing the men to reach a sensible conclusion. This may have otherwise cost the life of a minor. The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of The Criminal Trial Process
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Importance Of The Criminal Trial Process

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Jurors
    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Jurors

    o Individuals who hold a specific high state, commonwealth officers or holding public sector roles in relation to courts or justice system.  Exempted. One could be pardoned as a juror: o On the premise of one’s occupation o Relation to respondent o Medical conditions- pregnancy, mental or physical impairment and any other therapeutic condition which makes one unacceptable to go to jury administrations o Are unfit to peruse as well as comprehend English. o Have to take care of school aged children and are unable to make any other arrangements. o Have transport difficulties.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men: Group Dynamics
    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men: Group Dynamics

    Group Dynamics Which source of group influence explains why we don’t cut in line, interrupt others, or invade people’s personal space? In what ways does this source of influence differ from the others? When we are out in public we display certain societal norms, it is different for everywhere we go. For example, when going into a bank you know to hold the loudness in your voice to a certain degree while talking to the cashiers. You also know to wait in line for your turn and not cutting people in line.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Nullification In The Justice System
    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Jury Nullification In The Justice System

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification In The Washington Post Summary
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jury Nullification In The Washington Post Summary

    A Professor of Law at George Mason University wrote an article about the jury nullification in the Washington Post. In it he focuses of various aspects that make this process so interesting and contradicting. The author give his personal view on jury nullification and his initial attitude toward it. Jury nullification can be seen as a two edged sword, because it is not applied on constant and consistent basis. The author, Ilya Somin agrees that it can curb unjust laws, however it can backfire.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification In The Podcast: The Life Of The Law
    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jury Nullification In The Podcast: The Life Of The Law

    The Secret Power of Jury Nullification Response In the Podcast “The Life of the Law, Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification”, Shannon Heffernan explains the often overlook power of jury nullification in the U.S. court system. She defines nullification as, when a jury is convinced that a defendant is guilty but find the defendant innocent anyway. Heffernan provides examples of cases throughout history that aid the idea that nullification among juries can potentially benefit courtroom justice. She also weights its negative effects that cause potentially major injustices in courtrooms.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Jury Nullification In The Criminal Justice System
    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury Nullification In The Criminal Justice System

    We are told that laws are here to protect us and the common good, but what if certain laws harm us? Slavery was considered a constitutional right and was upheld many times in court even thought massive amounts of Northern disagreed with the laws. And rightfully so! Should they have respected these laws that made people property? I hope not.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System In Australia Essay
    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury System In Australia Essay

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Five Factor Model Of Jury Duty
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Five Factor Model Of Jury Duty

    Juries are a key component of the justice system and they exist as the ultimate deciding factor in terms of defining the defendant as guilty or not guilty. In order to be on a jury and occupy one of the twelve spots, a jury consultant digs through the potential juror’s social media networks. Jury Consultants accumulate information about the jurors and check to see if the information they find is “favorable” or “unfavorable”. Jury Consultants have a job of Jury Profiling, which is the implementation of social science to help lawyers understand the underlying factors that jurors possess.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues In Defense Attorney
    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethical Issues In Defense Attorney

    The jurors, probably the most important aspect of the criminal justice system, in itself. The American justice system, is built on the idea that justice is blind, therefore, justice is fair, however, it is the jury that ensures that fairness, with that said, it is understandable how one’s bias can compromise the criminal justice system. Therefore, jurors are faced with their own personal bias, moreover, they struggle with their decisions due to personal beliefs, some of which may not be ethical. It is clear, that the adversarial, or adversary system, allows for the most transparent and fair process that exist on this planet, just ask the People’s Republic of…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    A few examples would be with juror 7- voted guilty because he had a baseball game to get to, and after a long while of arguing juror 8 decided that if no one else votes not guilty then he would vote guilty and that would be the concluding verdict. The first alliance is at the beginning after everyone but juror 8 voted guilty. Juror 9 steps in and gives him a chance to explain why he doesn't find the boy guilty. This juror didn't get offended or ignorant to what juror 8 had to say. As the day goes by, jurors 3,7 and 10 make an alliance that would eventually change as more and more thoughts are said.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Reflection Paper On 12 Angry Men
    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reflection Paper On 12 Angry Men

    The movie “12 Angry Men” opens to the jury room and fills with twelve juries’ arguments and complain over the murder case. The case was about whether an eighteen year old boy should be found guilty or not guilty about his action. He was accused of killing his father by stabbing him with a knife. The boy’s life is depended on the twelve juries, and those juries are gathered in all different work fields with a little knowledge in criminal justice. The juries began its deliberations; they started to vote and all the jury vote “guilty” except for one, voted “not guilty”.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings