The formation of the group is more in task orientation which all twelve jurors have common goal to be achieved. In the movie, the jurors are choice based on difference background and experience and the reason for the teams form is to fulfil his civic duty and social responsibility. The jurors have no relationships between each and other and they will not retain any relationship after the trial. It clearly show the negotiation process is a one off with served the short term purpose. The decision style is more analytical which but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie.
Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial. However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision. At the end of the movie, juror 3 has …show more content…
He is a leader which has ability to influence others person decision. He decision style is combination of directive and analytical. Juror 8 has forms alliance with juror 9, juror 11 and juror 2 which have ambiguous roles. His logical thinking and good team player able to guide the deliberations which other jurors agree with him. Establish good relationship and form a trust with jurors are one of the tactic of Juror 8 which able to change the results of the vote. Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the
Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial. However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision. At the end of the movie, juror 3 has …show more content…
He is a leader which has ability to influence others person decision. He decision style is combination of directive and analytical. Juror 8 has forms alliance with juror 9, juror 11 and juror 2 which have ambiguous roles. His logical thinking and good team player able to guide the deliberations which other jurors agree with him. Establish good relationship and form a trust with jurors are one of the tactic of Juror 8 which able to change the results of the vote. Developed trustworthiness between jurors is an ice-breaker encourage to discuss the case fairly and without prejudging the