Jury Selection Process Essay

Improved Essays
There are a few steps to the jury selection process. The jury is selected from a jury pool. A jury pool is a list composed of registered voters, voter registrations, carriers of hunting licenses, utility bills and state issued drivers licenses. Jurors of six and twelve individuals are chosen from a jury pool. Then the selection process begins. The first step is a random selection from a jury pool. The second step is the jury selection, known as voir dire. Voire Dire is a jury procedure, which the court and the attorneys narrow the pool of jurors. This process is done by the judge randomly selecting people in the juror pool to be excused and/or the attorneys questioning potential jurors to screen out individuals the attorneys think might be biased or otherwise incapable of delivering a fair verdict. In some instances, an attorney may have reason to believe there is information that suggests a juror maybe prejudiced about the case and ask the judge to dismiss the juror for cause. Next, there is the challenge for cause. If a potential juror’s responses indicate that he or she will not be able to make a fair decision, then the attorney may ask the judge to remove that prospective juror from the case. Lastly, there is the peremptory challenge. Peremptory challenge is when the prosecution and defense can removal potential jurors …show more content…
Prosecutors and defense attorneys seek to identify potential jurors who may be instinctively sympathetic or hostile to their side. Then try to find ways to exclude those potential jurors who may sympathize with the other side. People always apply their experiences, values, biases and beliefs to their decision making, which can hurt an innocent person on trial. Racism is common in jury selections too. Black defendants are significantly more likely than whites to be convicted on at least two crimes when there are no potential black jurors in the jury

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the last 250 years, U.S. citizens have been given a controversial option of a jury or bench trial. Not everyone agrees with the bench trials. Although jury trials sound like a good idea, it is actually true that bench trials are better because it guarantees the right verdict almost all the time. Jury trials choose ordinary citizens off the street. For example, with the society today, people cannot stay off their phone, which makes them vulnerable to hearing or gathering false details about the trial.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main concept of a voir dire is to determine whether a jury can be “fair, impartial arbiters of fact”. Potential jurors usually are selected from voter registration records for what is commonly referred to as jury duty. In the U.S., they must be from the same jurisdiction as the defendant. After a pool of potential jurors is selected, attorneys for both sides either suggest questions for the judge to ask, or they ask questions themselves of the jurors. The attorneys for both sides have a limited amount of “peremptory challenges,” with which they can bypass the judge and dismiss possible jurors for any reason.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Duty Case Study

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although some find this an unreasonable task to ask of anyone, these people do not want to take the time to learn about community news and issues. Allowing oneself to be involved in the community gains friends, knowledge, and joy. Jury duty should be viewed as another opportunity to experience these aspects of life and not as a…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Selection jury is made up of (typically but not always) 12 jurors, also there are some on standby. Potential jurors are ordered to the court, and have already gone through the first part of pooling. The jurors also will fill out a test which was made in advance, and has questions submitted by both sides of the case. They use this test, in order to gauge how a juror will feel and vote. Both of the sides in a case can excuse any juror (with reason), also each has a number of peremptory challenges which can be used to pick out a jurors without giving a reason.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution affords defendants the right to a trial by an impartial jury through the Sixth Amendment (Hall, 2015). The selection of the jury is a precursor stage for all jury trials, in this stage, the counsel for the defense as well as the counsel for the prosecution have the right to request the dismissal of a potential juror commonly referred to as voir dire. In the instance where there is a specific reason, a potential juror is to be dismissed it is called a challenge for cause. Conversely, in the instance where a there is no supported reason an attorney may use what is called a peremptory challenge to dismiss a potential juror. The main difference in the two challenges is the reasoning.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Law professor Peter Van Koppen explained why this is such an issue stating that jurors often have to decide “technical issues beyond their aptitude.” I was unaware that the jury trial began in King Henry II time to settle land disputes. When the American Colonies where formed the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury nullification provides the power necessary to prevent manic judges and prosecutors from abusing their power. Judge Bazelon agrees the jury should be told of their…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification To condemn a person for an act that he or she did that broke the law is hard to decide. The jury is there to assist so the decision of the case does not depend solely on the judge. A jury consists of usually twelve people. They are there to come up with a verdict based on the evidence presented to them at court.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Voir Dire is the questioning of individuals to determine who is to serve on the jury (Lippmann, 2014, p.519). After the prosecution and defense attorneys questioned their potential jurors, Judge Kams granted a break.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Jury Defense

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “May it please the court, your honor, opposing council, members of the jury - an impossible burden means an impossible conviction,” Sophomore Lora Randa said to a crowd of people gathered in a courtroom in Eau Claire on Feb. 11. Tension and competition filled the room as she continued to tell the story of an innocent girl being accused of first degree reckless homicide. Randa is a dedicated member of the school’s Mock Trial team and is the attorney that closes the case for the defence.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many African Americans do not go to trial because they are advised that they would earn an easier sentence from pleading guilty; innocent people are coerced into pleading guilty because it known that they will have a smaller chance of beating the charge in court. Some reasons for African Americans being dismissed from jury duty include: too young or old, single or divorced, religious or not, failed to make eye contact, lived in a poor part of town, had served in the military, had a hyphenated last name, displayed bad posture, were sullen, disrespectful or talkative, had long hair, wore a beard (Liptak). These reasons are called peremptory challenges which are the right in jury selection for the attorneys to reject a certain number of potential jurors without stating a…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Issues Relating to Racial Profiling in Law Enforcement Law enforcement officers often use the term profiling, which refers to a practice of describing individual behavior (positive or negative) and/or certain personal characteristics. At some point in time, the term profiling has evolved from its original specific intent and shifted from an individual’s actions to the individual’s race, ethnicity or national origin of an individual. Many individuals have seen law enforcement officers from interstate highways to airports describe an individual criminal behavior based on race. In the United States, racial profiling has been used as a way to stereotype an individual or groups solely on race and/or even on the person’s negative behavior still…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics