Jury System In Australia Essay

Improved Essays
In a criminal trial, a jury is a group usually comprised of twelve randomly chosen adults, whose role is to hear evidence, apply the law as directed by the judge, and then collectively decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime they have been accused of, based only on the facts given. Juries have played a significant role in Australia’s justice system for quite some time, though in more recent years the role of juries has been reduced. In 2011, the NSW government changed the law so that accused persons could apply for judge alone trials and, with consent from the Director of Public, avoid juries entirely (Whitbourn 2013). Currently there is much debate as to whether or not the jury system should be scrapped entirely for criminal trials in NSW.
A reason that supports the idea of scrapping the jury system is the lack of
…show more content…
In giving ordinary people the role of deciding the innocence or guilt of someone in court, it can allow them to feel more confident in the legal system of their own state or country and safer in their own lives. Also, it can allow members of the community to feel as if their opinions and views on crimes are valued by the government and legal system. . Whitbourn (2013) states that Nicholas Cowdery, former NSW director of public prosecutions said, ' 'juries perform a valuable role in connecting the community with criminal justice and in bringing into the process the community 's values and standards ' '. What is meant by this is that in taking the opinions of the community into consideration when judging criminal offences, the government are able to see the values and standards of the community which they wish to be met by those around them, which could potentially lead to new or amended laws as said values and standards

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If such, eliminating peremptory challenges may cause a greater downfall in the sense that attorneys may have to deal with the knowledge of possible unfairness living amongst juries within the courtroom. The author informs: “Studies by the National Jury Project in New York reveal that 25 percent or more of prospective jurors presume that a criminal defendant is guilty before the trial starts.” As a result, the peremptory challenge is disputed as a necessity due to the probability that jurors may not admit to any form of biases and/or fail to disclose accurate information without the process under…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Though, another may believe in the more liberal concept that perfection includes the inclusion of flaws, which can become quite convincing. In saying so, there is no one policy or law that should be narrowly subjected to the entirety of all judicial court cases. There is a need for some degree of flexibility in accordance to each individual court case, for no two cases are equal and just as no two persons are exactly alike, not even identical twins. A middle ground regarding the differing sides of the abolishment of peremptory challenges may be to keep the component a part of the judicial process with the requirement of impartial reasoning for dismissal of potential jurors. If not for the dismissal for cause, there can be an honorable third party’s involvement in jury selection instead of the prosecutors or defense lawyers of the specific case doing so themselves.…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Terry Edwards Trial

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Then the prosecution team gets to interview the jury and has the power to kick some out, so there will be no biased votes. For instance if the suspect is a police officer and one person on the jury is a former police offcier, they will be excused because they might vote in favor just cause of their job. Another reason a person may be kicked off the jury is if they have former connections with them. SO what does this have to do with this case? From these three pieces of evidence, we can clearly see that people now and in the past have manipulated court scenes, juries, and lawyers just to prosecute lives that are innocent.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bench Trial Dbq

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, a typical person generally has a lot of sympathy for other individuals. If they feel sorrowful for the defendant they are likely to give them the benefit of the doubt. In a bench trial, a professional judge with years of experience has no sympathy for an ordinary citizen no matter the circumstances. The jurors are human and haven’t trained as near as much as a trained judge. If a person chooses the jury trial…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Australian Legal System

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Legal systems can be dated back to the ancient peoples. There are many different legal systems that have evolved in other parts of the world. There are two types of legal system, the secular and religious legal system. It is argued that the Australian legal system is radically different to other legal systems. This, however, is not the case through findings and comparison with the Madayin legal system and Talmudic Jewish legal system.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Duty Case Study

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although some find this an unreasonable task to ask of anyone, these people do not want to take the time to learn about community news and issues. Allowing oneself to be involved in the community gains friends, knowledge, and joy. Jury duty should be viewed as another opportunity to experience these aspects of life and not as a…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    courts. She also provides multiple examples through history, such as the U.S. revolution and prohibition, where jury nullification has had a large impact on shaping our nation. Insight provided by courtroom professionals benefits both the negative and positive effects of nullification. Diamond’s study puts the issue of nullification into perspective when she explains how rare nullification actually occurs and places trust in our juries because they contain the values that represent our society. Heffernan’s argument for the positive effects of jury nullification seems to outweigh the negative effects.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The key topic that is under debate throughout this paper is jury nullification and how its procedures work within the justice system, as well as some of its strengths and weaknesses. There is quite a bit of controversy surrounding jury nullification being used as a primary rectification in the justice system as it tends to make equal outcomes become unequal outcomes. Jury nullification is a process in which a jury reaches a verdict of not guilty despite the fact that the defendant is actually guilty of the actions he or she is being charged for. The jury nullifies a law that is believed to be immorally wrong or wrongfully applied to the defendant.…

    • 2583 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the inclusion of everyday citizens in a trial, it fosters political and civil engagement among citizens. Juries uphold their political power with the use of jury nullification. “the right of juries to nullify or refuse…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Nullification Essay

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The topic of jury nullification has long incited debate, with strong opinions on both sides. Paul Butler a former Special Assistant United States Attorney in the District of Columbia, claims jury nullification is necessary in order to fight laws that are racially unjust and argues that African-American jurors should exercise their right of nullification and it is their moral responsibility to emancipate some guilty black outlaws (Butler, 1995, p. 679). Jury nullification, occurs when jurors deliberately vote to acquit a defendant, regardless of evidence presented to establish the defendant’s guilt (Spohn, 2009, p. 68). It is a mechanism employed by prosecutors to encourage jurors to disregard the law and evidence and acquit defendants (Horowitz,…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Jury Defense

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “May it please the court, your honor, opposing council, members of the jury - an impossible burden means an impossible conviction,” Sophomore Lora Randa said to a crowd of people gathered in a courtroom in Eau Claire on Feb. 11. Tension and competition filled the room as she continued to tell the story of an innocent girl being accused of first degree reckless homicide. Randa is a dedicated member of the school’s Mock Trial team and is the attorney that closes the case for the defence.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I only consider trial by jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by man, by which a government can be held to its principles of its constitution.” Thomas Jefferson said this when talking about the jury system. He is saying that the jury process is one of the few ways that people can make sure that the government is following their own rules. People have been questioning the government system lately with everything that has been going on. For instance, Edward Snowden gave up his life to show the people of the United States what the government has been doing.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, the jury is not a democracy. The jury reaches a verdict based only on evidence provided to them during the trial. Additionally, the trial aggravated a vast misunderstanding of the defense counsel’s role, a problem present before the case.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury System Dbq Analysis

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You can, however, say that some of the jury would not be paying attention which could impact the trial but, a jury is made up of more than a couple of people. It is possible that a small portion of the jury would be listening to come up with a decision. This decision would either be the majority of the votes or the same decision would be chosen by people who were not paying attention to agree with the vast majority (Document D, Cartoon1). To continue, another reason for being in favor of jury systems is it prevents corruptions. In bench trials anyone can bribe the judge in order for them to win the case, but in jury trials you will not know who the people are until you show up in court.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics