The Needs Of Gun Control
Amendment was place for all individuals. The second amendment is a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed., only for particular reasons. Gun control laws are needed to control gun violence, to stop people from killing each other, and to decrease crime rates. For example, gun 6control could save lots of families.
Luke Scott a professional baseball player said,”Gun control means control. It means control for the government and the government starts controlling the people.” It’s not the citizens that obey the law that breaks the laws. It 's mainly the criminals that …show more content…
It is lawful and legal to possess a shotgun or a rifle. We trust in complying with the law. “How many have to die before we will give up these dangerous toys?” If people like officers start getting killed by guns on a everyday basis or if there kids get killed. When is it going to be controlled. .
“It takes a good guy with a gun, to stop a bad guy with a gun (unless the bad guy 's a much better shot).” But if the government stop the bad guys from getting guns the good guys will not have to worry about stopping the bad guys. If the gun shops have officers that sit around and watch the shipping, and the transaction for the bad guys to get the gun. The bad guys will not get the guns. For example, Loomis money truck have people that make sure that the transaction don’t go wrong.
So, why can 't the government put that similar to policy as loomis for guns? I know it wouldn 't be hard to do. In my mind I don’t think guns will be stolen. Most guns that doesn’t get a serial number probably have gotten stolen or a delivery guy must have sold it to a person like a booster. If the government put someone in place so that a transaction will not happen everything will be okay. When this policy be put in place they can keep guns out of the criminals hands and reduce the crime …show more content…
If people have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill you than if they don’t have access. There would be more fights. More fights is better because there would be less deaths. More guns also equal more suicides. People would try and commit a crime and when the police come to get them they would shoot the victim and then themselves. For example kids get bullied and their parents have guns. They may go looking for the gun or already know where it’s at and kill themselves while their parents are at work. I feel that on the off chance that somebody needs to purchase a rifle and go chasing in the weekend, it 's their business and has nothing to do with me. Similarly, on the off chance that you essentially feel more secure realizing that you have a shotgun in the house to protect your children, sufficiently reasonable. But you don 't have to have an assault rifle in your house for protection a shotgun is good