Second Amendment Pros And Cons

Great Essays
The Second Amendment, is a very controversial area under discussion in the media. Both advocates for and against gun ownership have been lobbying Congress to gain legislation in their favor for decades. Congress is at a standstill over gun issues and has voted down all proposals on gun control in the legislature. Although regulation is useless against criminals some harm can be avoided through tougher unified gun control, the American people have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, nevertheless regulators must decide who should be allowed ownership of what guns and if any training should be required among other issues, regulation must be clearly defined in order to protect society from needless harm.
Proponents of gun control have debated that the Second Amendment only applies to members of militias and does not apply to individual
…show more content…
They argue that the State regulated militias are the National Guard units found all over the United States. The Supreme Court has ruled contrary to this claim.
In the course of recent years, support for firearm control has diminished significantly and contentions mounted by defenders of the privilege to remain battle ready have picked up energy. Since the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller, decided that the Constitution secures a singular's entitlement to own a firearm for individual use Congress has voted down all proposed gun legislation. In July 2010 the Supreme Court decided that this applies to state and local government overturning a 30 year old Chicago gun law (Duignan n.d.).
Most federal gun laws were enacted through one or more of these acts: the National Firearms Act (NFA) signed into effect in 1934 and amended in 1968, charges taxes on the production and exchange of, and orders the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the article titled “Repeal The Second Amendment? That's Not So Simple. Here's What It Would Take” by Ron Elving on NPR.org he discusses why people may want to repeal the second amendment as well as why it would be considerably difficult. The article summarizes the steps that it would take to repeal, change, or add an amendment to the constitution. A proposed amendment must have a two thirds majority in Congress and a further three fourths majority in favor in the votes from the states.…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The procedural history of this case was very interesting as in the first trail that happened in Washington D.C. at the federal court refused to grant Heller, plaintiff the right to possess the gun, because the court stated that the second amendment only applies to the militias such as the National Guard. Later, the final decision was issued on June 26, 2008 favoring Heller with 5-4 decision that determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court of United States struck down the Firearm Law of 1975 as unconstitutional regarding the decision. The decision did not overturn any previous court decisions. This was the first case ever regarding the second the amendment and how…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2008, after the Court had decided Heller and said that the Second Amendment includes an individual right to keep and bear arms, Otis McDonald and other Chicago residents sued the city for violating the Constitution. They claimed that Chicago’s handgun regulations violate their 14th Amendment rights. Specifically, the residents argue that the 14th Amendment makes the Second Amendment right “to keep and bear Arms” applicable to state and local governments. The federal district court ruled for Chicago and McDonald appealed. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided for Chicago, as well.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment focuses on two clauses, the establishment clause, and the free exercise clause. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment or religion, or prohibit the free exercise thereof.” In other words the First Amendment is a religious expression of peoples own political expression (Patterson 114). Within this amendment there are two clauses that hold many differences and can come into conflict with each other.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I hold the 2nd amendment true, but have realized that something needs to be done to counteract all of the gun violence in America. According to the Gun Violence Archive, around 13,286 people were killed by firearms in 2015. This is 13,286 to many, we need to implement a new law to stop people who have bad intentions when using firearms. America should make it mandatory for any person who buys a firearm, weather long barrel or short barrel to qualify with their weapon. After qualifying they have to take a test that will show their mental state when it comes to making a decision with a firearm.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How do I feel about The Second Amendment? I feel that there is a negative and positive side to second amendment. The positive side is that you are giving anyone without a criminal record the right to have a gun anywhere they are allowed, so they can help in a harmful situation. They also have the ability to protect themselves. The negative side is having a firearm close or nearby small children.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States, there are certain rights that are protected by law but there is also some people that believe that it should not be protected. The second amendment which grants the right to bear arms has been a topic of an ongoing debate of whether or not the government should have more gun control. The two sides have really good point of views. One side maybe want less gun control because owning guns keeps them more secure in case of emergencies, for example: if people are breaking in homes, the residents with guns can fight back in case the home invaders have guns on them. Another example, people may need more guns in case of bigger threats like terrorist attacks and so on.…

    • 1935 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ”(US Const. amend. II) The meaning of this amendment to the United States Constitution has been heavily debated topic for decades.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual right to possess and carry firearms. In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified its earlier decisions that limited the amendment's impact to a restriction on the federal government, expressly holding that the Fourteenth Amendment applies the Second Amendment to state and local governments to the same extent that the Second Amendment applies to the federal government. Despite these decisions, the debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues. However, the amendment has continued to adapt to the different time periods of our country and create safety for our…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The government is trying to interpret the second amendment a different way so states can be in control of their gun laws. This is America, The land of the free. If there was a right made by the founding fathers that created this country why are they changing it? The founding fathers didn’t want the government controlling people’s lives but it is. But the one of the freedoms people have they’re trying to take away.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, citizens in the United States have used guns to protect themselves, their families, and their nation. As Americans sit down to watch the news each day, they are witness to an increasing number of shootings in many different forms, which range from schools to live interviews. The right to bear arms is guaranteed by the second amendment in the Bill of Rights. However, there are some citizens who believe that if stricter laws are put into place regarding gun control, their second amendment rights will be violated. So, what is too far and what is not?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, opponents of gun control say that a strict restriction on guns is a violation of their Second Amendment ’s right. In order to find a conclusion to the debate, a balanced approach to gun…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    This modern debate about the Second Amendment created a massive argument whether it protects the individual right to keep and bear arms, or a right that can only be applied through a militia organization. This is a debate that been around among people and the government and has two sides. on one hand, some believed that the phrase ``the right of the people to keep and bear arms`` give the right to individual U.S citizens to carry a firearm while on the other hand, the phrase `` a well regulated militia`` argues that owning a firearm should only be under a militia organization. So now the question that all the people are concerned about it whether this amendment really protects their rights and gives them the freedom or does it endanger their…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Brilliant Essays