I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. They shouldn't be allowed to use electronic surveillance because they are invading our privacy. They can’t do that without court orders or warrants, so they can’t do it to just regular normal people. This can lead to misunderstandings. Bottom line our rights would be denied and taken away if the electronic surveillance enabled.
The government would be invading our privacy because sometimes we have very private conversations that we want nobody to hear except the person who we are communicating with. Electronic devices will be tapped or as many people like to call it bugged. The government would …show more content…
It is an extremely burdensome process. And I like it that way. So the script basically says the government can't use electronic surveillance without a court order. They have to get that order so they have evidence or proof that you are a criminal or harmful to citizens. I think James is saying that because of the 4th Amendment. The 4th amendment states that people should feel safe,secure,and have a right to privacy. Therefore if that law gets passed then how will we feel safe when we are being watched and heard every minute of the day.
In conclusion, I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. I say they shouldn’t because the only reason why the government should have the need to gain access of someone’s texts, emails, or hear phone calls is if the citizen is showing key signs of a crime. We have rights and they shouldn’t be pushed off to the side. This surveillance can lead to a very bad misconception. In closing the government shouldn’t be allowed to use electronic