Should Government Use Electronic Surveillance Essay

Improved Essays
Should the government be allowed to use electronic surveillance ?

I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. They shouldn't be allowed to use electronic surveillance because they are invading our privacy. They can’t do that without court orders or warrants, so they can’t do it to just regular normal people. This can lead to misunderstandings. Bottom line our rights would be denied and taken away if the electronic surveillance enabled.
The government would be invading our privacy because sometimes we have very private conversations that we want nobody to hear except the person who we are communicating with. Electronic devices will be tapped or as many people like to call it bugged. The government would
…show more content…
It is an extremely burdensome process. And I like it that way. So the script basically says the government can't use electronic surveillance without a court order. They have to get that order so they have evidence or proof that you are a criminal or harmful to citizens. I think James is saying that because of the 4th Amendment. The 4th amendment states that people should feel safe,secure,and have a right to privacy. Therefore if that law gets passed then how will we feel safe when we are being watched and heard every minute of the day.
In conclusion, I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. I say they shouldn’t because the only reason why the government should have the need to gain access of someone’s texts, emails, or hear phone calls is if the citizen is showing key signs of a crime. We have rights and they shouldn’t be pushed off to the side. This surveillance can lead to a very bad misconception. In closing the government shouldn’t be allowed to use electronic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Post 9/11 Privacy Rights: The Case Against Electronic Surveillance In response to concerns about terrorism after the attacks on September 11,2001, the government of the United States enacted new guidelines for conducting surveillance on the public. This paper will discuss the implementation of electronic surveillance as a tool to combat terrorism and will make the case against sweeping electronic surveillance of American citizens and others in this country. Various examples of increased surveillance along with decreasing privacy right will help the reader to conclude that these tactics have not reduced incidents of any type of crime, including terrorism. This paper will also discuss several types of electronic surveillance, including the collection of metadata from telephone records, which intruded on the private lives of citizens and did not increase their safety in any meaningful way.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the government is invading our privacy it’s like having them watching our every move and constantly looking through our photo’s, Facebook messages, and text messages. For example when the FBI wanted Apple to unlock a terrorist phone so that they could look at the text messages. Apple informed the FBI that if they unlock that phone then they would be forced to unlock all of the phones. If they did this then hackers or the government could get a hold of something they don't need to know about. The government need to stop invading our privacy because if something gets leaked it could cost the government a lot of money or ruin someone’s life.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Ethical Dilemmas

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This means that even our most private and personal phone calls, texts, and emails are subject to review by government officials. There should be more limits placed on how much the NSA can actually access and if they come across a person of interest or anything they deem suspicious, they should have to obtain a warrant so the person is aware they are going through their personal things. Otherwise, the government is taking away the right that has…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    9/11 Research Paper

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having surveillance means that the government has the right to watch and record basically everything people do. The government put video cameras up in schools, buildings, stoplights, and satellites covering virtually everywhere. According to Alex Sinha (2013) NSA, the National Security Agency, started collecting as much information and data as possible from permanent residence in the United States in hopes of reducing the odds of another terrorist attack (p. 862). In 2013, Sinah also claimed in the early 1960s, NSA began keeping a “watch list” which was a list of American citizens who were traveling to Cuba and were questionable to pose a danger to the President (p.864). Sinha (2013) then goes on to state in 1967 the watch list turned into a systematic attempt to track those Americans who were questioned to be involved in a civil disturbance.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article titled, “Electronic Surveillance,” written by Cornell University states, “Obtaining a warrant for electronic surveillance requires showing probable cause, describing in particularity the conversation to be intercepted, providing a specific time period for the interception of the communications device, and noticing the property owner unless law enforcement can show exigent circumstances. As with ordinary searches and seizures, exigent circumstances may serve as grounds for law enforcement to dispense with first obtaining a warrant. If law enforcement encounters a situation threatening a person's life, a conspiracy threatening the national security, or a conspiracy suggesting organized crime, then law enforcement may proceed without first acquiring a warrant.” The U.S. has clearly been using surveillance technology unconstitutionally.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some say domestic surveillance has interrupted civil liberties or rights of the people. Many officials like law enforcement, believe this is a great use of National Security for protection. Either way, people will share their opinions amongst each other. Improvements in the future are reducing terrorism, nuclear actions, and criminal affairs in the country. Negative improvements include the rights of people, their disagreement with the surveillance situation, and more laws or acts that will be…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FISA can now be used to get a warrant to monitor citizens who are not linked to terrorism at all. Though a warrant is needed to monitor, the government has abused their power and used FISA to monitor citizen's electronics without one. The Effects of 9/11 on American Surveillance Because of the September 11th terrorist attacks, many facets of…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The spying would keep a good eye on terrorist and gang related crimes. According to the NSA surveillance terrorist, offender and wrongdoer groups have been shut down because they can get into electronics without you knowing. When they get into electronics for example if…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spying In 1984

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Democracy is a very valuable thing. The rights of the people must be preserved in a successful democracy.the government has no right to monitor electronic devices, as spying us limited by law, it threatens democracy, and can be used to arbitrarily convict someone of a crime. Could the United States become a utopian government like in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1984 Government Privacy

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The central theme of this research paper is about how the privacy of american citizens are being violated by the government. American citizens should not be willing to give up their aspects of their personal privacy to the government to feel safe. The government has no right to have control of people’s personal privacy for the greater good of society. In 1984 big brother has telescreens all over the place in houses, offices, stores and in workplaces etc. where he is able to watch everybody twenty-…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or should the NSA have more rights looking into people’s whereabouts to provide safety of the United States. The reason why this act is causing so much conflict is because in some opinions it’s violating the first and fourth amendment of the constitution, but in others opinions it’s providing us safety and isn’t violating the constitution. The reason why they may never be able to have a compromise is because they may never be able to choose between what matters most, freedom or safety, and that is why this issue is extremely…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is also the reduction of individual rights. The U.S. government has taken so much of our rights away. The government has started using drones and other methods to spy on U.S. citizens. The U.S government has also started tracking everything that goes on over the web.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most critics of surveillance argue about how it is an abuse of power, a violation of people 's privacy, and most importantly, unconstitutional, while proponents of surveillance claim the benefit of surveillance is a reduction in the probability of high-cost events such as terrorism. Government surveillance programs, when conducted in controlled situations and closely audited by independent organizations, do not directly harm innocent civilians, especially when they benefit the safety of the general public. Surveillance, by definition, is the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime. If that definition was used when discussing the issue of government surveillance, most public safety activities,…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays