Patriot Act Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
There are many disputes debating on whether the Patriot Act should be legal or not. The Patriot Act’s purpose is to “[make] it easier for the government to obtain the orders and allowed for greater coordination among intelligence agencies and law enforcement”(Philadelphia, par 14). But at what point is obtaining information from the American citizens too far? The issue for this debate is does the Patriot Act violate the people's rights. This debate has been going on since 2001 as some view the Patriot Act as unconstitutional while others believe it’s protecting the safety of the people. Critics believe the Patriot Act “implicates constitutional concerns under the First and Fourth Amendments, raises serious threats to privacy and civil liberties …show more content…
6). Many American citizens aren’t confident in this stance since they believe by the NSA snooping into their information and possibly breaking “the first and fourth amendment” (qtd. in Privacy, par 5.) but the Patriot act is not limiting their freedom. However, a survey in 2014 shows that a “majority of Republicans and independents disapproved of the NSA’s collection of phone and internet data” (Philidelphia par. 24). What they don’t know is that “It works” (qtd in Christie, par 26) and how it helped the people in not just the Fort Dix case but also in the British national Hamant Lakhani case. By these two cases it proves that the Patriot Act is indeed improving the safety of American citizens. It has protected the United States from possible further terrorist …show more content…
By using someone's liberty or freedom it shows that people are willing to argue on something that may or may not take away that right from them. Critics of the Patriot Act believe it is unconstitutional because it gives the NSA the ability to look through people’s information without permission or reasoning. However, the advocates of the Patriot Act state how it is constitutional because it does give the NSA ability to look at people’s information, but they don’t listen to phone calls or do any unlawful acts like how critics may believe. Whether or not the Patriot is legal or not, it’s not an easy answer to keep the Patriot Act. At what point is searching through people’s information enough? Or should the NSA have more rights looking into people’s whereabouts to provide safety of the United States. The reason why this act is causing so much conflict is because in some opinions it’s violating the first and fourth amendment of the constitution, but in others opinions it’s providing us safety and isn’t violating the constitution. The reason why they may never be able to have a compromise is because they may never be able to choose between what matters most, freedom or safety, and that is why this issue is extremely

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Many people are at odds with themselves. They want to feel safe and secure by having the government attain the information inside the phone. Another part of that person wants to have their privacy respected because the government should not have the ability to see in that citizen’s everyday lives. A recent incident of terrorism, in San Bernadino, California, has caused many Americans to create a list of priorities. Some have put their own privacy at the top, while others put the safety of our nation above individual privacy.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These programs are doing damage to the values the United States claims to hold most dear - freedom of expression, freedom of press and the right to counsel. However, the secrecy of the programs is creating even more uncertainty that leaves journalist 's and sources confused on what the rules and regulations of The Program really are. This uncertainty has created what is being referred to as "surveillance-induced chill" in reporter-source relationships. President Obama has attempted to clarify the limits of NSA programs in speeches but whenever he tries to clear things up, he purposely uses vague language that leaves reporters more confused than they were…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the information that is leaked or released? That seems to be the case for Snowden. Many believe that he did a service to the American people by released the NSA documents. However, others believe that he should not have released the documents because he has possibly put the United States in danger. There is a constant…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the government be allowed to use electronic surveillance ? I don’t think the government should be allowed to use electronic surveillance. They shouldn't be allowed to use electronic surveillance because they are invading our privacy. They can’t do that without court orders or warrants, so they can’t do it to just regular normal people. This can lead to misunderstandings.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The tracking put on by this program, and the NSA is a very important part of keeping our country safe for these people. Even though the anti-supporters feel that the security is effective, they have their own opinions on the program. According to Andrew Croker of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which specializes in defending the right of Americans, says “There’s a lot of privacy concerns in something this widespread, and those concerns only increase if we have an intelligence coordinating them” (A1). The anti-supporters feel that their right to privacy is being taken away with this new program being implemented. They don’t want to have the government overlooking them every time they make a phone call, or do something on the internet.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is hard to believe Congress when they say the reason nothing has been done about gun laws is because the American people aren’t passionate enough, despite there being poll numbers that prove this wrong. It seems like Congress is ignoring the majority and siding with the loud minority. It also doesn’t seem like they are doing much conflict resolving and more like ignoring the issue all together. Conflict resolution is another key function of Congress where their job is to resolve the differences between each perspective. They don’t seem to be taking the issue of gun safety seriously.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kick The Habit Essay

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Governments around the world are failing to keep people’s privacy since they do not keep the data they have confidential, they use social networks to invade people’s privacy doing so without informing them about it, and the whole process of privacy invasion hasn’t proved to be totally efficient in most countries. For the governments demanding information for the so-called “security”, citizens as well have the right to demand security of privacy. Citizens need reassurances that the data collected by the government’s security systems is secure, confidential, and invulnerable. What is meant, is that citizens need to know where will the information gathered about them go and know who will have access to these pieces of information. “WikiLeaks”, a web portal devoted to disclosing confidential information from governments, corporations, and other large and powerful entities, is a great example that no databases is 100%…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiretapping is an infringement of a person’s rights. The United States has the power to do this under the U.S. Patriot Act, but they actually are only allowed to monitor a conversation if they have a probable cause and a warrant. A great quote regarding NSA Wiretapping in relation to the Patriot Act comes from Dean Heller, a senator from Nevada. He said in a press release that “there is a fine line between protecting our nation and protecting our Fourth Amendment rights.” (Heller, 2013) This quote goes to show that while the nation should be protected, the government should not have the right to blatantly overlook the rights of the people of the country. The elastic clause was a major factor in the establishment of the Patriot Act.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NSA should continue to survey the United states but under supervision and guidelines. Some are adamantly against the NSA taking data from citizens because they say that this is goes against the 4th amendment rights. “Large amounts of cellphone data raises questions about the erosion of people 's privacy as well as their Fourth Amendment protections…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is meant to protect innocent people from terrorism, nuclear weapons, and crime. Although it does do this, it is not always agreed with. U.S. people do not always like the idea of an agency analyzing, and collecting communication data from their people. The extent of the surveillance is quite shocking, but it is used to protect innocent lives of the United States people from things that can be stopped. The National Security Agency does have reasonable doubt when they get involved with a person’s communication.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays