The Government violated DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights. They did not get a warrant to do search and seizure on DLK’s property. DLK should not be convicted of growing marijuana in his home because the technology that the Government used goes against the five senses rule, the device (thermal imager) that they used in not open for use in the general public, and last, DLK had an expectation of privacy in his own house.
One reason that DLK’s Fourth Amendment right were violated is because the thermal imager that the U.S. Government used broke the five senses rule. In Document D it states,”When technology can exceed the natural senses, it subverts the human ability to contain private matters in a normal way.” DLK tells us in his opinion, that if …show more content…
According to Document A,”The Government believed Katz was giving people in other states gambling information over the phone. Federal agents put a bug … on the outside of the public phone booth that Katz used. The bug produced evidence that led to Katz being convicted on gambling charges. Katz appealed saying the recordings from the bug could not be used as evidence because they were obtained without a warrant. The Court of Appeals disagreed, but the Supreme Court agreed with Katz.” The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do
One reason that DLK’s Fourth Amendment right were violated is because the thermal imager that the U.S. Government used broke the five senses rule. In Document D it states,”When technology can exceed the natural senses, it subverts the human ability to contain private matters in a normal way.” DLK tells us in his opinion, that if …show more content…
According to Document A,”The Government believed Katz was giving people in other states gambling information over the phone. Federal agents put a bug … on the outside of the public phone booth that Katz used. The bug produced evidence that led to Katz being convicted on gambling charges. Katz appealed saying the recordings from the bug could not be used as evidence because they were obtained without a warrant. The Court of Appeals disagreed, but the Supreme Court agreed with Katz.” The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do