The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act

Better Essays
Domestic Wiretapping and Surveillance without a court order.

Civilized human beings tend to discuss personal private information with each other everyday. Whether they want the information to be known or not by other people is out of their control. People conduct phone calls and texts messages with each other day in and day out. People assume that these are private one-on-one conversations with each other, but little do they know that there is a third party monitoring their conversations. After 9/11 occurred, the Bush Administration designed a law called the “Patriot Act.” The purpose of the Patriot Act is to surveil cellphones, tablets and anything that has a connection to the internet without you knowing. It is unconstitutional
…show more content…
According to the American Civil Liberties Union “The Patriot Act increases the Government 's power to obtain information from wiretapping and surveillance.”(www.ACLU.org) The Patriot Act was developed to keep the citizens of America more safe from terrorist attacks. There is also a disadvantage of this Act because this an infringement of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. The American Civil Liberties Union also states that “ Section 215 of the patriot Act violates the first amendment as well.”(www.ACLU.org) The first Amendment gives the people the right of freedom of speech. This is associated with wiretapping because wiretapping records telecom communications such as text messages and phone calls. The ACLU briefly states that “ Section 215 allows the Federal Bureau Investigation to force cellular phone companies in handing over cellular data records without any warrant present.”(www.ACLU.org). This is highly unlawful because the Fourth Amendment protects you from unlawful searches and seizures. Therefore this law is counteracting our Constitution, which even the government has to …show more content…
Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many Americans were outraged when the issue of electronic surveillance came to their attention. The electronic surveillance should’ve only been used to prevent criminal activities and terrorist attack prevention. The spying of American citizens infringes on our fourth…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    But what authorized investigation is all of America’s phone records relevant to? Government surveillance is out of control and is undermining the basic human right to privacy in the United States. The intended purpose of government surveillance is to make a preemptive strike on terrorist attacks before they can happen. According to Lynn Reaser from Point Loma Nazarene University, “The sacrifice of a small amount of security may well be worth the benefit of saving lives” (Roger 4). To Reaser, the end justifies the means when it comes to surrendering freedom in the name of safety.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiretapping is an infringement of a person’s rights. The United States has the power to do this under the U.S. Patriot Act, but they actually are only allowed to monitor a conversation if they have a probable cause and a warrant. A great quote regarding NSA Wiretapping in relation to the Patriot Act comes from Dean Heller, a senator from Nevada. He said in a press release that “there is a fine line between protecting our nation and protecting our Fourth Amendment rights.” (Heller, 2013) This quote goes to show that while the nation should be protected, the government should not have the right to blatantly overlook the rights of the people of the country. The elastic clause was a major factor in the establishment of the Patriot Act.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For countless years, we have seen examples of the United States Government having massive power. For instance, government being able to control what we hear and detect on the news. For example, the news about Edward Snowden and how he caught the NSA for surveillancing U.S citizens was biased. There was only opinions against him and the news never went in depth with the topic. This may cause citizens to question whether the government is reliable or not in behave that we entrust them to construct laws and constructing policies that are faithful and somewhat becoming beneficial to us.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Al Gore (former Vice President of the United States) believes the Patriot Act takes away American Freedoms that once made this country great. “The Patriot Act allows the government to intrude on our privacy and violate the United States constitution” (Al Gore). In other times of Crisis, laws like this were taken away later after realizing they violated our constitutional rights. This isn’t the case with the Patriot Act because it gives the government more power over us then they need. “The Patriot Act allows law enforcement agencies such as the FBI and CIA to legally perform physical searches of homes or headquarters, these agencies may tap phones, monitor Internet use and e-mail, use electronic eavesdropping devices, and inspect suspects' financial, credit card, student, employment, and other records, without probable cause or proper warrants” (The PATRIOT Act and the Fourth Amendment).…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    4th Amendment Essay

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment emphasizes that people have the right to not be subjected to unreasonable searches and that they are “secure in their persons, house, papers and effects”. Espionage violates this amendment when they search through people that are suspicious and subject them to torment and arrest. An example of unorthodox espionage is the fact that the NSA has been “engaged in an illegal mass surveillance sharing programme that has affected millions of people around the world” as exposed by Edward Snowden, a former NSA contractor (Bowcott). The NSA has been performing surveillance that is very unethical and unjust. This must not continue because it violates America’s law saying that no citizen should be subjected to random searches.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The law also breached the Fourth Amendment, which should protect people from being search and seizure. It raised controversial issues, such as violating the Constitution and agents could monitor a terrorist even if they haven’t found evidence he belongs to a foreign terrorist organization. As a result, it had a tremendous impact on our social lives and Patriot Act gave the FBI to access personal information. The government had the authority of surveillance, which allowed them to see on particular person’s communications and suspect houses. US senator Edward Snowden showed the government information about the agency was using the law to justify the bulk collection of data about millions of phone calls.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essay On Internet Privacy

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages

    CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) is another act which makes companies report any form of cyber threat they discover. It is set up so that anyone threatening over the internet will be turned into the government and although it’s meant for our safety it doesn’t give us much privacy. CFAA (Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) is the final act and it makes it a federal crime to share protected information. These acts are set up to insure that we are safe on the web but it also means that the NSA is not breaking any constitutional…

    • 1106 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The fact that Snowden, as a citizen of the United States, chose to expose secrets about his government can be seen as traitorous. That is a valid argument. There is also a strong argument to be made that the NSA was acting within the law. As director of national intelligence James R. Clapper states, ‘The National Security Agency’s collection of telephone and other communication data has been done entirely within the law; Americans are not being spied upon.’ (Clapper). There are many with this view point that believe that, but on the other hand many do not as they choose to believe the proof provided by Snowden in his leaks.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through these secret court orders, telephone companies like Verizon were forced to hand over its information relating to users of the phone company. The Patriot act had a clause that allowed the government to collect metadata on millions of Americans. The new freedom act removes Section 215 of the Patriot Act; this reform prevents the government from collecting telephone metadata on millions of Americans, instead the government would need to get a warrant on a particular person (Diamond). Along with bulk collection of metadata, the government has lost its ability to collection certain business records and track certain individuals “who aren’t necessarily a part of an organized terror…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays