The Patriot Act: The Dangers Of The Patriot Act

Superior Essays
Domestic Wiretapping and Surveillance without a court order.

Civilized human beings tend to discuss personal private information with each other everyday. Whether they want the information to be known or not by other people is out of their control. People conduct phone calls and texts messages with each other day in and day out. People assume that these are private one-on-one conversations with each other, but little do they know that there is a third party monitoring their conversations. After 9/11 occurred, the Bush Administration designed a law called the “Patriot Act.” The purpose of the Patriot Act is to surveil cellphones, tablets and anything that has a connection to the internet without you knowing. It is unconstitutional
…show more content…
According to the American Civil Liberties Union “The Patriot Act increases the Government 's power to obtain information from wiretapping and surveillance.”(www.ACLU.org) The Patriot Act was developed to keep the citizens of America more safe from terrorist attacks. There is also a disadvantage of this Act because this an infringement of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment prohibits the government from conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. The American Civil Liberties Union also states that “ Section 215 of the patriot Act violates the first amendment as well.”(www.ACLU.org) The first Amendment gives the people the right of freedom of speech. This is associated with wiretapping because wiretapping records telecom communications such as text messages and phone calls. The ACLU briefly states that “ Section 215 allows the Federal Bureau Investigation to force cellular phone companies in handing over cellular data records without any warrant present.”(www.ACLU.org). This is highly unlawful because the Fourth Amendment protects you from unlawful searches and seizures. Therefore this law is counteracting our Constitution, which even the government has to …show more content…
Edward snowden is a computer professional that is famously known for leaking information on the U.S. National Security Agency in 2013. Snowden said in an interview that “ The NSA has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything that is uses telecommunications.”(www.cfr.org). This infrastructure collects data all around the United States. This is private information that is being collected without our consent or a warrant being present. The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What would everyday life look like when the government can look through everyone's private information? The Patriot Act violates Civil Liberties and is Unconstitutional by restricting the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights of Americans. The Patriot Act violates freedom of religion and speech. It violates our right to search and seizure without proper warrants or probable cause. It is unconstitutional, and violates our civil liberties.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New technologies are putting more pressure on the boundaries of privacy. New ways are emerging that aid in tracking private information on individuals. No matter what new technology emerges, individual privacy rights should be respected at all levels. Americans are concerned of how to maintain an equilibrium between their personal privacy rights and the need for government to track potential terrorist threats since Edward Snowden leaked National Security Agency's (NSA) documents which included collections of information regarding data from cellphone and internet of millions of Americans. Freedom, privacy and safety are the rights of Americans and should not be compromised to confirm safety from terrorism. Edward Snowden is a hero because his…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Following the attacks that occurred on 9/11, the United States government established the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was put into place to ensure the safety of the citizens of the United States by enhancing the security of the country. The act revised the nation’s surveillance laws, expanding the government’s authority to look into the records of citizens. This law also reduced the judicial oversight, public accountability and the ability to challenge government searches in court. These alterations and additions to the surveillance of the United States was said to ensure the safety of the people from ever having to experience any terrorist attack like the one that happened on 9/11. Although the act was intended to protect the citizens and…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq Essay

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The one reason many Americans oppose the Patriot act is because of its little success. Even with this act in place, "it doesn't make us any safer" (source 2). As far as catching terrorists, it hasn't showed many results. However, there are many other crimes that can be easily detected by having the ability to see all cell phone activity. For example between "2003 and 2005, there was 53 criminal referrals" (source 5). These referrals were related to money laundering, immigration and fraud. These threats were not based on terrorism, however, it still served America for other reasons. By allowing the government access to…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are so many citizens of the United States who do not agree or like the NSA’s involvement in communication networks. For example, “This country was founded on the notion of liberty. So it is striking to us that we have reached a point in our history when the expectation of privacy and liberty is dissolving” (Paul and Yoho). A major argument against the NSA is that it violates the rights of the countries people. Paul and Yoho say “We need to go back to the basics and use the Fourth Amendment as our guide.” There are so many people that look back at the amendments and realize how many times a new system of protection, like the NSA has violated to protect the people well good. There are so many great things about their system, but so many feel different about their ideas of communications.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government has used a relaxed approach to the Fourth Amendment. After September 11th, 2001, Congress enabled the Patriot Act in order to prevent future attacks from terrorists and protect the United States from other threats. The Patriot Act, as the Department of Justice states, provides “law enforcement with new tools to detect and prevent terrorism” (the U.S. Patriot Act: Preserving Life and Liberty) allowing them to access the information that is necessary for terrorist investigations and making it easier to prevent attacks. The Patriot Act also states that law enforcement is authorized to “obtain a search warrant anywhere a terrorist-related activity occurred”, which means that if there is evidence of terrorist activity, law enforcement is able to investigate. This involves the examination of personal records such as phone records and other personal records. As Daniel Zwerdling states in his article, that “you can't claim that information is private" (NPR) If it has been shared with companies that hold the e such as phone companies, electric companies, etc. The government justifies the examination and seizure of personal records with this argument. As a result, with this view of the Fourth Amendment, the U.S. government has been able to conduct multiple investigations, including some that are relevant to terrorism and others that are…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fourth amendment states that the right of the people to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const., amend. IV). The NSA spying on U.S citizens is similar to an unreasonable search through a person’s private documents. Whether or not the U.S government feels they are justified for their actions, they are not. The attempts of the head members of NSA to paint Edward Snowden as a criminal, are hypocritical, and are a transparent ploy to shift the negativity away from…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 26, 2011, President Barack Obama signed a bill that reauthorized some parts of the Patriot Act. This bill called for a four year renewal of some provisions of the surveillance issues. Even though most of the Patriot Act is still in the law, there are some parts that congress has to reauthorize periodically or they will “expire.” One of these things is the wire taps. This is the ability of law enforcements to look at phones to track targets without consulting a judge first. When the Patriot Act passed it gave law enforcements more ability to have more surveillance powers to help prevent more terrorist incidents. Some civil rights advocates argue that this is a violation of Americans privacy rights. Liberal Democrats and Tea Party Republicans have tried to amend the Patriot Act to help protect Americans from having their privacy rights violated. In late 2009, the “expiring provisions” of this act were up for re-authorization. President Obama signed the re-authorization even though there was a delayed vote and many months of Congregational…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Bush passed the Patriot Act. The act allowed the government to to be able to see any forms of information in which the people had looked at on a smartphone or internet searches. The government could also listen into the phone calls of other people. The Act proved itself on December 25, 2009, when a man known as the “Underwear Bomber,” attempted to pass through security with a bomb placed in his undergarments. It proved to work because it allowed to authority to go through his history and were able to see his means of terror followed by the bomb. “Federal prosecutors insisted that they used the “terrorist” label only to insure that the accused would receive tough sentences. But if that was the only concern, there would have been no need to apply the Patriot Act retroactively,” (Olson). The only question is whether or not the American people believe that the act is necessary or not. The question is formed by the people and that is ‘Freedom or Authority?” This idea is crucial because the U.S. government has two jobs; To preserve the freedom of the American people, and to protect the American people in order to preserve the freedom of them. The opposing beliefs argued that the act takes away their fourth amendment rights. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The PATRIOT ACT also creates much controversy when it comes to what information they collect, the fourth amendment protects the “right of the people to be secured in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”, this amendment states that law enforcement needs to obtain a warrant before a search can be conducted, except when there is a probable…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    USA Patriot Act

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of these laws is the USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism, allowing the government power to violate many of our amendment rights. The USA PATRIOT Act violates our Fourth Amendment rights by giving the government the power to search and seize Americans and their property without a warrant. Along with that, it also violates our Sixth Amendment rights by allowing the government to imprison Americans without any charge, the right to a trial, or the right to legal representation.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some of the scandals that have shown that executive powers in the fight against terrorism can be abused include secret prisons abroad, communication interception and detainee abuse. Public mistrust that the fight against terrorism may be costing their civil liberties is justifiable when the government eavesdrops on their private conversations. The fourth amendment of the constitution clearly stipulates explicitly that persons have the right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects, and their rights against unreasonable searches and seizures must not be violated. Any official surveillance of international calls or emails of Americans within the U.S required an approval from FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court), but there have been reports of government eavesdropping despite the presence of legal…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s true that the Patriot Act has acted to violate privacy expectations and suspect regular Americans citizens. “It violates the privacy of millions of innocent people” (source 1). This law enforcement has the power to broadly access American citizen’s internet researches, telephone calls, text messages or also, emails…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Friedman and Kerr). However, the USA PATRIOT Act amends several parts of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III) in such a manner that violates the civil liberties granted by the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1657). FISA, specifically Section 702, permits United States intelligence officials to examine the “communications of foreigners outside the U.S. without a warrant” (Schallhorn), while Title III “established that governmental interception of an individual’s telephone conversation, conducted without the target’s consent, constitutes a search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment (Rackow 1658). Specifically, Section 218 of the USA PATRIOT Act alters FISA § 1804(a)(7)(B) such that a federal officer is no longer required to show that the sole purpose of surveillance is to achieve information of foreign intelligence, but…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Research Paper

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Patriot Act was put in place to eliminate terrorist from creating more deaths and destruction. Due to the article, “The Patriot Act” clearly states, “… the proposed new law would among other things, enable the government to ask a court to revoke the citizenship of any American who provides ‘material support’ to terrorists.” Also, the article “Department of Justice,” mentions “The Patriot Act imposed tough new penalties on those who commit and support terrorist operations, both home and abroad.” Some people may feel that if the Patriot Act gets stronger, then it would violate the fourth amendment within protection against unreasonable searches and the first amendment having to do with freedom and association. Agents are being allowed to use new technology in order to keep up with attempted terrorists and to save most Americans. If agents don’t monitor computers and other statistics and the Patriot Act doesn’t impose new tough laws, then there won’t be a United States of America. Agents are able to track computers and trespassers who are trying to hack into government software and/or who are communicating with others who are trying to terrorize the United States. The ACLU also warned that American freedom is endangered by the Patriot…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays