How Did The Patriot Act Violate Civil Liberties

Superior Essays
Josh Rozdolsky Saleh The Patriot Act United States History

What would everyday life look like when the government can look through everyone's private information? The Patriot Act violates Civil Liberties and is Unconstitutional by restricting the First Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights of Americans. The Patriot Act violates freedom of religion and speech. It violates our right to search and seizure without proper warrants or probable cause. It is unconstitutional, and violates our civil liberties.

Before the events that occurred on September eleventh two thousand and one, it is said that the United States government had enough tools and necessities to prevent it and fight
…show more content…
Al Gore (former Vice President of the United States) believes the Patriot Act takes away American Freedoms that once made this country great. “The Patriot Act allows the government to intrude on our privacy and violate the United States constitution” (Al Gore). In other times of Crisis, laws like this were taken away later after realizing they violated our constitutional rights. This isn’t the case with the Patriot Act because it gives the government more power over us then they need. “The Patriot Act allows law enforcement agencies such as the FBI and CIA to legally perform physical searches of homes or headquarters, these agencies may tap phones, monitor Internet use and e-mail, use electronic eavesdropping devices, and inspect suspects' financial, credit card, student, employment, and other records, without probable cause or proper warrants” (The PATRIOT Act and the Fourth Amendment). This directly goes against the fourth amendment in the bill of rights of the United States. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was passed in nineteen seventy eight. The United States government used to use FISA and acts like FISA to spy on other nations governments and citizens, the difference with the Patriot Act is, they are spying on their own citizens. “The provisions of Section two hundred and thirteen of the Patriot Act allow federal searches to be conducted and delayed notice to be given to the subject. The subject of the search may never be given notice that a search was conducted if criminal proceedings are not initiated after the search” (the Patriot Act). The Patriot Act directly opposes the fourth amendment of the constitution of the United

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    4th Amendment Essay

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This must not continue because it violates America’s law saying that no citizen should be subjected to random searches. Andrew Grosso argues that the fact that the EEA now does wiretapping proves to be a violation of civil liberties and says that “wirestaps are one of the most intrusive of all investigative techniques” (Espionage and Intelligence Gathering 134). Wiretapping does not only violate the First Amendment but the Fourth Amendment as well. With the EAA listening and tracking down all of our messages and phone calls, the citizens of America are subjected to unreasonable searches and anything they say might be taken as threats against the government and United States. The Fourth Amendment should be more enforced when it comes to…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It is better, so the fourth amendment teaches us, that the guilty sometimes go free than the citizens be subject to easy arrest”(William Douglas). The Bill of Rights was devised to restrict the government’s power and to guarantee personal freedoms. Edward Snowden released documents that exposed government programs that were designed to personal information in order to ensure national security. Those programs, predominantly ran by the NSA, have undoubtedly stimulated unreasonable searches, therefore transgressing the fourth amendment. The USA is a republic.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    US Senator Richard Burr says, “We are on the floor today talking about taking away some of the tools that have been effective in helping us thwart attacks. It is the wrong debate to have” (“Pros and Cons”). Security and stability in life come with the appropriate protections and preparations. Allowing surveillance to provide security to the country will save people from having to worry about major terrorist attacks, such as 9/11, from happening again. Also, technology is advancing in every part of the world, so it would be a waste not to make use of the resources under America’s possession, especially when every other country could be using it against American citizens.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States’ Constitution, The Necessary and Proper Clause allowed Congress to pass the Patriot Act into law, which enabled President Bush to create many national security programs. These programs put limits on the citizens’ basic rights in order to serve as a preventative action against terrorist attacks. While working for The National Security Agency Snowden uncovered the PRISM program and warranted the media about what he believed was a violation of our constitutional rights. To understand this issue we can look to Hobbes in Leviathan. In Leviathan, Hobbes argued that “The passions that incline men to peace are fear of death, desire of such things as are necessary to commodious living, and a hope by their industry to obtain them” (Hobbes 111).…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But what authorized investigation is all of America’s phone records relevant to? Government surveillance is out of control and is undermining the basic human right to privacy in the United States. The intended purpose of government surveillance is to make a preemptive strike on terrorist attacks before they can happen. According to Lynn Reaser from Point Loma Nazarene University, “The sacrifice of a small amount of security may well be worth the benefit of saving lives” (Roger 4). To Reaser, the end justifies the means when it comes to surrendering freedom in the name of safety.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fact that Snowden, as a citizen of the United States, chose to expose secrets about his government can be seen as traitorous. That is a valid argument. There is also a strong argument to be made that the NSA was acting within the law. As director of national intelligence James R. Clapper states, ‘The National Security Agency’s collection of telephone and other communication data has been done entirely within the law; Americans are not being spied upon.’ (Clapper). There are many with this view point that believe that, but on the other hand many do not as they choose to believe the proof provided by Snowden in his leaks.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The law also breached the Fourth Amendment, which should protect people from being search and seizure. It raised controversial issues, such as violating the Constitution and agents could monitor a terrorist even if they haven’t found evidence he belongs to a foreign terrorist organization. As a result, it had a tremendous impact on our social lives and Patriot Act gave the FBI to access personal information. The government had the authority of surveillance, which allowed them to see on particular person’s communications and suspect houses. US senator Edward Snowden showed the government information about the agency was using the law to justify the bulk collection of data about millions of phone calls.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US government is charging him for the violation of the “Espionage Act” for leaking unauthorized information to the press and intruding on government’s property. Furthermore, Snowden leaks illustrated government inconsistency over the right of privacy. If Snowden intrudes on government privacy, it is a violation of their rights and is unconstitutional. For this reason, Snowden should be prosecuted and put in jail. When National Security Agency and US government intrude on the privacy of millions of people and justify their action by saying that it is to protect against terrorism, it is ok.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisa Pros And Cons

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fact that National Security Agency was authorized to monitor Americans’ international phone calls and emails together with warrantless wiretapping and searches proves that the law was unconstitutional. The Act requires several other amendments to address technological advancements such as automated monitoring methods and foreign intelligence needs. This would be essential in implementation of proper programmatic approval processes. Another criticism arose in that, there was no proper framework to detect who the terrorists were despite the fact that FISA provided for monitoring mere communications of known…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays