Spying In 1984

Improved Essays
Any government has absolutely no right to spy on their own citizens. Whether is the United States, or the totalitarian government of 1984, Spying on innocent citizens should not be permitted. the act of spying is limited by law, threatens democracy, and illegally obtained evidence can be used to incriminate someone unfairly.

It has been 230 years since the United States constitution was signed, yet the government still follows the law of the land. The right of privacy was established when the first 10 amendment were established, and “begins with the fourth amendment to the constitution, which states clearly that Americans privacy may not be invaded without a warrant based on probable cause” (NSA). In addition to the fourth amendment,
…show more content…
In 1984, of someone were to commit a crime, then “your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you have ever done was wiped out, and your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten” (Orwell).The arrests made in 1984 were done by telescreens and hidden microphones. People would be accused of thoughtcrime, and eventually killed. Invading someone's privacy in order to convict them is illegal and immoral. The United States has strict laws preventing this from happening, yet government agencies such as the N.S.A. “infringes on ‘that degree of privacy that the founders enshrined in the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures” (Judge). These unreasonable searches and seizures like conducted in 1984 , are illegal, and infringing on human rights.

Democracy is a very valuable thing. The rights of the people must be preserved in a successful democracy.the government has no right to monitor electronic devices, as spying us limited by law, it threatens democracy, and can be used to arbitrarily convict someone of a crime. Could the United States become a utopian government like in

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The novel 1984, written by George Orwell, represents a precise delineation of people who are under direct and interminable watch. Each and every move that is made is meticulously observed. Michael Yeo establishes the suggestion that “Essentially, surveillance in the novel is a monitoring or policing function” (55). There was, indeed, no way to distinguish whether you were being inspected at any appointed period. It is evident that, under no circumstances, the slightest gestures could give you away.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Government introduces you to a precedent that has to do with DLK’s case because in this case they intended for their info to be private, but the government used something that goes above the five senses so you would need a warrant to use it. This is important because in DLK’s case he intended for his info to be private, but since the government used a thermal imager without a warrant just like the bug in the Katz case, they found out he was growing marijuana in his home. No one else would want someone else to find out something that they are doing if it is private. While some may argue that the government can do that without a warrant if they are suspicious, no one would want their private info to be found or heard by the government. In conclusion, the Government should not invade your privacy unless given a warrant to do…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Who, What, When, Where and Why am I Being Watched In George Orwell’s 1984 and Phillip K. Dick’s “Minority Report” the governments are obsessed with surveillance of their people in order to keep their control over their citizens. Thus their citizen’s privacy suffered to the point where it is nonexistent. With the assistance of technology, the governments are able to keep citizens oppressed and Orwell and Dick openly express their negative views on government surveillance. 1984 is a story written in the 1940s that shows what England would look in a totalitarian government.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An article titled, “Electronic Surveillance,” written by Cornell University states, “Obtaining a warrant for electronic surveillance requires showing probable cause, describing in particularity the conversation to be intercepted, providing a specific time period for the interception of the communications device, and noticing the property owner unless law enforcement can show exigent circumstances. As with ordinary searches and seizures, exigent circumstances may serve as grounds for law enforcement to dispense with first obtaining a warrant. If law enforcement encounters a situation threatening a person's life, a conspiracy threatening the national security, or a conspiracy suggesting organized crime, then law enforcement may proceed without first acquiring a warrant.” The U.S. has clearly been using surveillance technology unconstitutionally.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nelson And Rubio Essay

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dear Senators Bill Nelson and Marco Rubio, It has been brought to my attention that the Government has access to surveillance systems that can monitor our phone calls, text messages, emails and etc if needed. I agree that the government should have this right, but I believe there must be some strict guidelines placed in order to ensure the personal privacy of citizens. While discussing this topic, it may seem scary to think as a citizen, that everything in our personal lives isn’t as private as we imagined it to be. But, the questions we all seem to ask ourselves about this issue is, “Why is all of our information so important to the government anyways?” or, “I haven’t done anything wrong, so why would they need to look at my texts or listen to my phone calls?”, and last but not least, “How is this legal?…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many users on the internet distrust communication, sharing, and storing in fear of government surveillance. Many cannot express their will freely because they are aware the government will be supervising their data. If people know that there is a government data base that records information and stores every search or call, this poses a chilling effect for their free speech. The large amounts of data removes a person’s ability to move on from past experiences if it can be recalled (Schneier 2015). The 3rd amendment has been interpreted by courts that there would be privacy of the home; there is no privacy because individuals are constantly monitored.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the United Nations, privacy is basic human right that should be protected by law. The United States Constitution also implies a right to privacy in the Fourth Amendment. Recent laws passed by the government have raised questions about whether the government’s actions infringe upon a citizen’s right to privacy. The USA Patriot Act was the first of many laws that increased the powers of government organizations such as the NSA and the FBI. The law allowed these agencies to access private records of US citizens without the need of a warrant or judge’s consent.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Society has always thought that it had the freedom and privacy it was enlightened to have in the United States of America. Most of society has not been enlightened with knowledge that they are most likely being watched all the time. Just like in the novel 1984, by George Orwell, the citizens are always being watched and have no privacy for themselves. Privacy is something that individuals greatly value but do not truly consider until it is taken away. The totalitarian government 's need to control, manipulate, and subvert the rights of its citizens in 1984 mirrors the United States government operation today.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The fourth amendment states that the right of the people to be “secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const., amend. IV). The NSA spying on U.S citizens is similar to an unreasonable search through a person’s private documents. Whether or not the U.S government feels they are justified for their actions, they are not. The attempts of the head members of NSA to paint Edward Snowden as a criminal, are hypocritical, and are a transparent ploy to shift the negativity away from…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spying In 1984

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many U.S. residents fear these extreme measures of data collection, as they use personal devices and may prove intrusive to daily life: “it's hard not to feel that we've lost too much control when secret laws and new technologies empower government... to secretly track, analyze, and record virtually every detail about our lives” (Oppenheim). The government of the United States has expanded their role in everyday life by spying on average citizens through their own personal devices. Not only can personal data be used by governments, it can also be used for…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason people believe this is because it is necessary in tracing criminals. On The Ethics of Surveillance, Tony Wu states, “if you haven’t done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear” (Wu, “The ethics (or not) of massive government surveillance"). Many different Governments tend to use this argument when people begin to question why they are constantly being watched. If there is nothing to hide, why worry? Another reason why the government needs to spy on their citizens is to reduce the total crime rate, and things such as terrorism.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the article of EFF (electronic frontier foundation), eff.org states, “News reports in December 2005 first revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been intercepting Americans’ phone calls and Internet communications,” (www.eff.org). The Fourth Amendment protects every American from the invasion of privacy. I do not agree what the NSA is doing because first of all Americans were not aware they were doing this and we do not know how long they have been doing this, they could have been doing this for 50 years and we did not even know. If they are trying to hide this from everybody then there is obviously something wrong with what they are doing. The Nsa is looking through all the content that comes in the country and goes out the country for “security reasons” but have no proof or warrant to allow them to do this.…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Surveillance empowers authorities to expand the range of their powers, leading to further rights violations (Greenwald 14). Because the state does not face backlash or repercussions, the government can take advantage of this passivity and expand their territorial powers. The expansion of state power only happens when the public does not take an active stance in having a say about the NSA, especially since the secretive FISA courts passed legislation about the NSA long before the public knew. People under the control of surveillance avoid certain political views and beliefs which is yet another mechanism of governmental control. The NSA diminishes the citizens’ voice by not allowing them to convey their opinions on these matters.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dan Gandio (2012) claimed that different types of people tend to enjoy more or less freedom than others for example the bourgeoisie enjoy more freedom than the lower class and this has lead to issues such as slavery, racism, feminism, same sex relationship bans etc. Secrecy and surveillance is a way of controlling individual freedom and blocking the public access to information can also limit freedom Bbc.co.uk (2014). An example of this was when the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans from Verizon on a daily basis. They also accessed the servers of nine Internet such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to track online communication. This was a violation of the privacy of their citizen’s privacy and justifies the point stated earlier.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays