Gun Control Should Be Changed To Help Cause Less Crime

Improved Essays
Gun control is a leading issue in today’s world and should be changed to help cause less crime. The United States has thirty thousand deaths each year because of guns. A good portion of these deaths are a result of illegal transactions of guns sold on the streets to criminals. Guns need to be tracked to whom or what organization owns them, as well as who may use and purchase a gun. To control this issue, guns should be traced and only sold by licensed vendors, in order to prevent guns from being bought by criminals. Background checks should also come into play when purchasing the gun to ensure the man or woman obtaining the gun has not been or have a history of committing serious crimes. These would cause guns to cause less crime and make …show more content…
The second amendment, right to bear arms, was originally referring to a well regulated militia, not everyday people. Another problem with the second amendment is the type of guns that would have been used regarding the second amendment, for example, a fully automatic rifle is much more dangerous than a single shot muzzle loading rifle. Guns kill 30,000 people in the United States each year and a majority of this is people unfit to use a weapon killing others. Even though there have been many attempts to control the firearms in the U.S. if does not always work. For example, the Federal Weapon Assault Ban banned nineteen models of semi automatic weapons and military features, as well as large capacity magazines. This ban would have been good to prevent people from using highly dangerous weapons which could be used to endanger others. This ban expired and was not renewed, due to congress not renewing it, and thus has no effect. Many people are being killed due to faulty laws and people who are either unfit to own a gun, or a criminal, and this needs to come to an …show more content…
Another thing to look out for and a reason for increased gun control is the criminals and non fit people to obtain a weapon, because if they can obtain guns without them being tracked, they can commit crimes and get away with it. We can stop criminals getting these weapons by banning criminals from purchasing weapons and having all sales regulated. Background checks would be a very simple thing to check if you are allowed to own guns. People are killed by criminals who obtain guns illegally and they can be stopped if we take action and prevent instances where a mass shooting may occur because of an illegal gun purchase. There also needs to be specific requirements for a man or woman to shoot or purchase a gun, a father and son went to a shooting range, the boy, eight year old Christopher Bizilj, shot an uzi, a fully automatic submachine gun, and could not control the recoil and did not let go of the trigger and ended up killing himself. Guns need to be controlled and should be tracked and have requirements on who should own and fire

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ineffective Gun Control

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The homicide rates have increased in Washington, D.C., Chicago, and New Orleans even though the overall homicide rate has decreased. There are forty percent of gun purchases at gun shows without background checks. Also, fifty-five percent of Americans prefer to have tighter regulations on gun sales. On the contrary, The National Rifle Association does not approve of having tighter regulations and will fight this issue (Warner). The National Instant Criminal Background Check system is run by the FBI.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They will not accept that your reason for needing a gun is to kill anyone. This makes since to me why would a government who has made it illegal to kill someone then sell a gun to a person who plans to use it to kill someone. The silliest argument against gun control I’ve heard is that you don’t need a gun to commit murder, which is completely true. People kill each other with knives and rocks and even their own hands. These objects have something in common they’re initial purpose is not to kill they also are not able to kill multiple people quickly.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a lot of crime in this world and a lot of it associates with gun use, but taking away guns isn’t the best option. Putting restrictions and so forth on the use of buying and selling of guns is the best way to go. Many arguments out there say that if they were to allow someone to have a gun then it will automatically turn into a murder or big crime. Whatever happened…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    With all the recent events that push for gun control, it’s time to stop and think on who this is really helping, the good law abiding citizens, or the law breaking criminals. With the impact that guns do in our society, it is time to stop and think what gun control could do for our nation. (MORE DETAIL) Although gun control seems it might help our society, gun control is a bad idea, because it disarms law abiding citizens and arms the criminals. Gun Control takes away the gun of people who follow the law. Citizens who follow the law will be the only ones affected by gun control because the guns that citizens buy are on a record, their guns could be taken away with ease because there are gun records of what guns the law abiding citizens use.…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Violence Argument

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having stricter gun laws would accomplish so much, it would prevent 353 mass shootings and many suicides. There were 464,033 total gun deaths between 1999 and 2013 and 270,237 suicides which is 58.2% of all suicide deaths and 174,773 homicides and 9,933 unintentional deaths (gun-control.procon.org/). Making stricter gun laws would reduce these numbers immensely. Having better background checks would prevent dangerous individuals, such as criminals, mentally ill, drug abusers and perpetrators of domestic violence. Weapons should not be sold not be sold by a private sellers or online because it creates an opportunity for dangerous people to bypass a background check with no questions asked.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just because there may be an interrelationship, or correlation, between two concepts does not mean that one is necessarily going to lead to the other. Establishing strict gun laws would put unnecessary restrictions on law-abiding citizens; therefore, they should not be enacted. Stringent gun laws do not always effectively prevent crime as criminals will still have their own connections to a gun in order to commit a crime; people need to stop playing the blame game and become educated about guns and the safety regarding them. Laws are put into place to give order; not to take away a basic right, such as the right to bare arms. If the right to bare arms were to be taken away, what would be taken away next, if that doesn’t solve the “problem”?…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The history of gun control in the United States of America. Murder statistics of firearms and other weapons. It will also bring up cases that are similar to gun control and how they were enforced and how they worked out in the end. The last thing it will cover is if gun control impedes on the rights of an American citizen. Introduction Gun control will not make it harder for criminals to obtain firearms.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays