Pro Gun Control

Improved Essays
Gun control causes a lot of violence and crime in the U.S., there needs to be more restrictions. Make it harder for Americans to purchase handguns, but can carry them as concealed weapons for protection. In the last year, ten thousand seven hundred and twenty eight people died from getting shot by a handgun(Gun-Control Dishonesty). Handguns should only be for protection, not because you want to kill someone. The second amendment states that it is your right to bear arms(Gun Control Costing States). Bear arms means you can carry firearms. My family and I own guns and we use them for protection, and sometimes we go to the range for fun to shoot. Shooting guns is a competitive sport, so it can be good and bad. It’s just people don’t need to be carrying them around to be …show more content…
It is 100% impossible to confiscate millions of weapons, but if we could put a few restrictions on purchasing guns, and using guns we could reduce the crime rate by at least half(Nraila.org). Instead of us focusing on gay marriage laws we need to be focusing on gun control and protecting our country. Our biggest enemy is ourselves. We inflict so much crime and violence on ourselves, it is unbelievable. We sell weapons to people who shouldn’t be allowed to posses a weapon. Our country also sells weapons to foreign countries for aid and protection which can cost us in the future. Gun control is a serious problem because there more and more cases of students bring guns to school. Also there are more intruders that enter a school and shoot it up because they are mentally challenged that need help which is why it is a great idea to have a resource officer at every school. If we had more regulations and rules it would make it harder for perpetrators to get a gun and shoot up a school or any public place. In April the senate rejected the gun control proposal because there are too many gun

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is estimated that there are between 270 million and 310 million guns owned by civilians in America (“United States-Gun Facts, Figures and Laws”). With this many guns in society, would gun control be controlling anything? Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. Instead, it would put many people in danger. The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Activist in favor of gun control believe that with gun control being enacted that the United States would not only be better off but safer as well. The other party who disbelieve in the need for gun control believe that with it the country will only grow more corrupt considering the facts that the states that have had gun constraints have grown more violent prove their point. Gun control would keep guns out of the United States for a short period after it would be enacted, but as soon as they are smuggled into the United States all of the citizens who had previously given up their arms now have no guns to defend themselves against robbers, muggers, or whoever it might be that threatens their lives. In order to keep guns better under control without taking away guns from citizens is by enforcing security in places like schools and for the government to keep track of who is mentally unstable and to make sure that there is no chance what so ever for them to get in reach of a…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay Gun control in America has always been an issue. With problems coming up such as school shootings, teens getting their hands on their parents’ guns, and kids accidentally shooting themselves, people want laws set forward to limit the use of guns. In “End the Gun Epidemic in America,” The Editorial Board talks about how they want stricter gun laws because no one really needs to own a gun. The Editorial Board believes there should be stricter gun laws in the United States because they think it’s too easy to get your hand on a gun and possibly injure someone. Their use of pathos throughout the article makes the audience want there to be stricter gun laws, but the use of logos and ethos is weak.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A trending argument for the upcoming Presidential elections is Gun Rights and if they should be stricter. Many recent shooting have occurred over the years and the most recent was last week in California where fourteen people were murdered. Many people want to ban the sale and take away people’s gun rights which is unconstitutional to do. We as American’s have to right to bear arms and defend our selves but people are scared that letting people have guns will cause more shootings and more crime and don’t realize that we need guns to protect ourselves. There are two sides to this argument about guns and gun rights.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Violence Argument

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Having stricter gun laws would accomplish so much, it would prevent 353 mass shootings and many suicides. There were 464,033 total gun deaths between 1999 and 2013 and 270,237 suicides which is 58.2% of all suicide deaths and 174,773 homicides and 9,933 unintentional deaths (gun-control.procon.org/). Making stricter gun laws would reduce these numbers immensely. Having better background checks would prevent dangerous individuals, such as criminals, mentally ill, drug abusers and perpetrators of domestic violence. Weapons should not be sold not be sold by a private sellers or online because it creates an opportunity for dangerous people to bypass a background check with no questions asked.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Government cannot simply solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. Just implementing gun control does not fundamentally solve the problem. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “The National Rifle Association and its allies tell us that "guns don 't kill, people kill" and urge the Government to punish more severely people who use guns to commit crimes” (Wilson, 127). The National Rifle Association and its allies told is very reasonable. The mistake of homicide case is the people want to kill someone, not what weapon he used.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Allowing the option to its law-abiding citizens, personal safety should be one of the top priorities in the United States. As crime rates have increased and violent crimes are reported more and more in the press, people need handguns so they can keep themselves and their families safe. On September 24, 1976, Washington, D.C. placed a ban that no one but police officers could have a handgun. The Washington, D.C. murder rate averaged 73% higher than it was before the ban. Therefore, banning the handguns did not work in decreasing the crime rate.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People think that the National Rifle Association (NRA) promotes what happens, instead the NRA promotes owning guns for protection. Mass shootings that we have seen, or think we’ve seen, are not caused by mentally sane people. Mentally unstable people are the ones who have caused so much havoc within the last few years. If someone is that unstable that they think going out and killing people for fun is ok, they should not be allowed to live anymore. People want to blame an organization, or come up with an excuse for other people 's actions.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Free Zone Analysis

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages

    But restricting guns in hands of law-abiding does not reduce gun violence; instead it increases the likelihood of gun violence by leaving potential victims easy prey for predators like Holmes.” John R. Lott Jr. says, “Gun-free zones are a magnet for those who want to kill many people quickly. Even the most ardent gun control advocate would never put “Gun Free Zone” signs on their homes. Let’s stop finally putting them elsewhere.” If so many places are supposed to feel safe, why is it that vicious killers are now targeting these places? The answer is only a logical explanation, because people are not able to protect themselves. The gun laws only make it exceedingly manageable to cause so much…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a critical provision as it determines whether the society can live with guns or not. However, most people are in support of gun control since its benefits outweigh its “alleged” demerits. The need to have a secure society cannot be fulfilled by allowing everybody to own guns. In fact, more guns in the society have led to the increase of suicidal missions in the US because some victims easily shot themselves when upset before thinking of counseling services. It is important to conclude that gun possession should be controlled and no unauthorized persons should be allowed to own a…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays