Argumentative Essay: Gun Control Is Bad Idea

Good Essays
Gun Control is Bad Idea Americans dote on guns. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Many people take advantage of the Second Amendment. Guns are used by millions of people for hunting and safety in the United States. However, a lot of shooting accidents were occurred in recent years. Many people think the Government should implement gun control. Government use laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms in order to control crime and reduce the harmful effects of violence. In fact the gun control is not a …show more content…
The Government cannot simply solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. Just implementing gun control does not fundamentally solve the problem. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “The National Rifle Association and its allies tell us that "guns don 't kill, people kill" and urge the Government to punish more severely people who use guns to commit crimes” (Wilson, 127). The National Rifle Association and its allies told is very reasonable. The mistake of homicide case is the people want to kill someone, not what weapon he used. We cannot attribute the mistakes to guns. For example, some years ago, Isla Vista killings case. The attack began when 22-year-old Elliot Rodger stabbed three men to death in his apartment. After he left the apartment, Elliot Rodger got into his BMW and sped across Isla Vista and fired more than 55 times. He fatally shot three people and wounded 13 others before shooting himself. In this case can we said that Elliot Rodger killed people because he had a gun? Absolutely no. Elliot Rodger killed people because he wanted to kill people. He had psychological problems. Even if at that time, the government already implemented gun control, Elliot Rodger would still kill people. Although Elliot Rodger cannot buy a gun, this cannot change his appetite that is kill people. Elliot Rodger would just change his weapon. Elliot Rodger may hold a machete …show more content…
That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens. It should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully, especially in places -- on streets, in taverns -- where the mere presence of a gun can increase the hazards we all face” (Wilson, 126). James Q. Wilson’s idea is excellent. Government should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully and increase efforts to combat crime, rather than simply execute gun control. Hopefully the government of the United States will make a right

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Yes, the banning of handguns is the wrong decision because banning them prevents people from defending themselves properly. Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association claims that “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”(Mantel 2). If bad guys knew that other people had firearms then criminals would be more worried about getting shot while the criminals committed a crime.Therefore, if the criminal was more worried about getting shot instead of committing the crime, the crime ratings would decrease. If a good guy did not have a firearm, then the criminals would run free and not have to worry about citizens returning the fire back at them. Allowing the option to its law-abiding citizens, personal safety should be one of the top priorities in the United States.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens. This victimization of the defenseless is even prevalent if the criminal does not have a gun. The government of the United Kingdom banned handguns, and over the following years, not only did murder go up, but more people were being killed by knives and strangulation…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Guns do not kill people; people kill people. Shooting a gun does not simply happen by itself, but the person behind the gun pulling the trigger. By regulating gun laws, we may say that by having stricter gun control, it will be difficult for criminals to get a hold of a gun, but it does not mean that there will be less crime or fewer deaths. Criminals do not follow the law regardless, so what makes everyone think that by having gun control, or by regulating gun laws that it will change the way things are. Therefore, there should not be stricter gun control laws in the United States.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People think that the National Rifle Association (NRA) promotes what happens, instead the NRA promotes owning guns for protection. Mass shootings that we have seen, or think we’ve seen, are not caused by mentally sane people. Mentally unstable people are the ones who have caused so much havoc within the last few years. If someone is that unstable that they think going out and killing people for fun is ok, they should not be allowed to live anymore. People want to blame an organization, or come up with an excuse for other people 's actions.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second amendment declares that all citizens have the right to bear arms. Many people believe that guns should be banned all together, others might argue and say why? Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. A gun is most definitely a hazard, but is it really the gun doing all the talking? A gun sitting on a counter for instance isn’t going to pick itself up and do any sort of damage.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If guns were out of the picture the generalization of those people would not be an issue. However, she does not place her faith in the government doing an adequate job of controlling the guns in the United States, instead, she wants an all-out ban because it seems to be the only logical solutions to the shootings in the United States. Furthermore, Bovy believes the issue is too complicated to just put a ban on certain guns. If people are still allowed to…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These people feel the only way they can feel safe is to buy a gun, which is intended to hurt people. “It is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). Here is a sign of pathos in the article. The Editorial Board is trying to make you aware of the dangers of buying and using a gun. That when you buy a gun, you’re either going to be hurting yourself or another person.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It seems as if the National Rifle Society’s (NRA) focuses more on the rights of gun owners and not the safety of citizens. However, the information gathered through my research has proven that there is really no specific way to successfully control guns. Those with the intent to commit crimes will ultimately find a way to do so, and those with mental health issues may show no signs of mental illness prior to legally purchasing a weapon. We cannot predict that a person will become depressed enough to take their own life, or act off impulse and shoot someone in a state of rage. Although I do not feel we can successfully implement “gun control”, I do feel stricter laws can decrease the amount of fatalities due to guns.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics