Case: Heller Vs. The District Of Columbia

Improved Essays
In 2008 a case was taken by the Supreme Court, that case was called Heller vs The District of Columbia. A special police officer whose name was Dick Anthony Heller had been in the service for awhile. Like all officers he was authorized to carry a handgun while on duty. Later that year he applied for a one-year license for a handgun he wished to keep at home, but his application was denied by the judge. Many cases has have to dealt with gun control, but many have not come in the favor of the person who is fighting the state, it’s mostly been in favor of the state. The government doesn’t want to feel like one specific thing is given or is done for an individual that the rest of the people cannot have or do, how I see this is like when a teacher …show more content…
The government constantly tries to avoid the problem of gun control, for example when tragedy happens the government quickly states that there is a problem with the gun control but never faces the problem straight on. The only way to fix the problem of people getting the guns to be completely disallowed in the United States, people should not be able to have gun unless you are an active police officer or part of the U.S. Army and you are actively are duty. Colonists had a reason for having guns they were threatened by the British and other countries once they got their government, but the people that live in the U.S. having all the protection they want with the police and the American army which is the best in the world. The U.S. motto is the land of the free which implies that you will be free of worrying about protection and hate. There should not be any reason to have a gun and some people in fact do feel safer knowing there's something in their house to protect them, but there are so many alternatives to having a gun. People still choose the guns over the alternatives and many of the guns end up in the wrong hands and those people take advantage of the Second Amendment by using the firearm for the killing of innocent people. The Second Amendment was not established for people to shoot innocent people, it was made so people could defend their home and …show more content…
People sell and trade guns illegally all the time and the government knows that but does the minimum to try and put an end to this. The government still tries to avoid the issue of gun control by focusing more on other countries business rather than thinking of their own people that are killing each other everyday because of the lack of gun control in this country. The Amendment was formed so that the people would have protection but the fact that the 2nd amendment is still in place and is being taken advantage of is puts the people in danger instead of protecting them, there has been an increase of people that are hurt because of guns it would mean that the more the guns are spread around America the more violence would occur.People might argue that in European countries there has been an uprise of terrorism, and that is in fact true but that is an outside figure that comes into the country to inflict pain or damage otherwise called a terrorist. But in our case the U.S. has not had a terror attack since the Boston Bombings in 2013, all of the events that have happened after that we're people that were mentally unstable or wanted to prove a point to the government and all of these were caused because of how the 2nd Amendment is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In two major instances states or cities have banned handguns in an effort to alleviate violence, and were challenged by United States citizens in a Supreme Court of Law. In the case Washington D.C. vs. Heller, the firearms control regulations act of 1975 banned handguns within Washington D.C., a Federal Enclave, because in the 1970’s the city was the murder capital of the United States. Handguns were not to be sold or possessed within the D.C. area, until in 2008 when Heller challenged the law after thirty three years. The case made its way to the Supreme Court and the court deemed the law unconstitutional, because it infringed on American citizen’s right to protect themselves with a firearm. This case only effected Federal Enclaves, but it called into question other entities jurisdiction over gun control.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this picture I am exercising the right to carry a weapon. Case: District of Columbia v. Heller(2008) In this case the District of columbia was fighting against Heller to ban individuals who aren't part of the military to posses a firearm at home even if the weapon is registered. Heller who was a special police man applied to register a firearm he wanted to keep at home but the District of Columbia refused. Heller disagreed with the government so he filed this suit and it went to the supreme court, this was a very close case.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court case, “District of Columbia vs. Heller” was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia for supposedly, infringing upon the rights protected by the second amendment. The suit was filed by Dick Heller, a police officer in Washington, DC. In an attempt to lower the crime rates, DC placed a ban on all handguns. The chief of police was allowed to give licenses to own handguns for a year, but denied most applicants. After heller and several others were denied, they brought the issue up to the local district court, which ruled in favor of the ban.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Supreme Court case takes place from the year of 2002-2008. This case is the case of D.C. V. Heller. The case of D.C. V. Heller is about hand gun and riffle ownership. The situation or background of the case is that hand gun and riffles were not taken and guns were not able to be used unless it was for military purposes.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following the decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which was one of the few cases involving the interpretation of the Second Amendment, Professor Lawrence B. Solum published a paper elucidating the reason as why the majority and minority of the court reached the decision they had distinctly supported, and how the two groups differed due to varying beliefs as to how the constitutional text should be interpreted and constructed. Justice Scalia, who wrote the opinion for the majority, instituted the “original public meaning” technique of interpretation, whereas Justice Stevens attempted to employ the “original intentions” technique. Solum goes through a long, drawn out discourse distinguishing these two methodologies of interpretation as…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme Court case explores the issue of being able to carry an unregistered firearm. Dick Heller argued that the District of Columbia's law violated the Second Amendment. This case was granted on November 20, 2007.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Thursday June 26 of the year 2008, The U.S. supreme issued a ruling regarding the District of Columbia v. Heller case. For the past 32 years, handguns in the District of Columbia were banned, a response to the gun-related murders. However in a close 5-4, with judges John Roberts, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas and justice Antonin Scalia voting for it vote the Supreme Court ruled that ban of the handgun was in violation of the Second Amendment and thus unconstitutional. Justices John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer, along with liberals Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter, voted no. This was the first time in the history of the Supreme Court that a gun law was ruled unconstitutional using the controversial and vague Second Amendment.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    District of Columbia v. Heller The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in the Constitution. There have been several cases where the Amendment has been challenged. As the world keeps growing and developing, the amendments have stayed the same since the creation in 1789. Therefore, as the years go by the original meaning of the text is getting lost in translation, which has caused the Supreme Court Justices to try to interpret the meaning the best way they can to ensure a fair trial.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Later the Court of Appeals reversed and directed the court. They later ruled it unconstitutional, to have a total ban on handguns, which violates the second amendment. Regulations on how to store your gun is inappropriate. The point of owning a gun, is self-defense. How are you supposed to defend yourself if your gun is unloaded, bounded, and disassembled?…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision that held the amendment protects an individual right to possess and carry firearms. In McDonald v. Chicago (2010), the Court clarified its earlier decisions that limited the amendment's impact to a restriction on the federal government, expressly holding that the Fourteenth Amendment applies the Second Amendment to state and local governments to the same extent that the Second Amendment applies to the federal government. Despite these decisions, the debate between various organizations regarding gun control and gun rights continues. However, the amendment has continued to adapt to the different time periods of our country and create safety for our…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The debate on gun control has been going on for a quite some time now in america. Some people believe that we should have gun control, while others believe that we should stop gun violence with more guns that can cause unnecessary violence. Although many people feel that guns should be allowed with us for safety, more guns out there can lead to more crimes involving guns ending up in wrong hands. There have been many incidents and shootings that have rekindled the gun control argument. An example of an incident is that on Feb. 29, 2016 in Madison, Ohio a high school student injured two other students with a .380 caliber handgun.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The procedural history of this case was very interesting as in the first trail that happened in Washington D.C. at the federal court refused to grant Heller, plaintiff the right to possess the gun, because the court stated that the second amendment only applies to the militias such as the National Guard. Later, the final decision was issued on June 26, 2008 favoring Heller with 5-4 decision that determined that handguns are "arms" for the purposes of the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court of United States struck down the Firearm Law of 1975 as unconstitutional regarding the decision. The decision did not overturn any previous court decisions. This was the first case ever regarding the second the amendment and how…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully, especially in places -- on streets, in taverns -- where the mere presence of a gun can increase the hazards we all face” (Wilson, 126). James Q. Wilson’s idea is excellent. Government should be to reduce the number of people who carry guns unlawfully and increase efforts to combat crime, rather than simply execute gun control. Hopefully the government of the United States will make a right…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constitution has made the country, so why stop selling guns, when the American people are used to have their own guns. It is also about your freedom and do what you want. Everyone is the architect of his own fortune. That is an unwritten rule. School shootings: There have been a lot of school shootings in the gun loving country.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays