Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
“An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind” was a very powerful quote once said by Mahatma Ghandi. The death penalty applies to this quote very well. There are alternative punishments for the the government to use on criminals. The Death Penalty should be abolished because it is unconstitutional, it is inhumane, it doesn 't deter violent crime.

The death penalty should be abolished because it is unconstitutional. The 8th amendment forbids the government from using “cruel or unusual” punishments (Is the death penalty constitutional?). What punishment is more cruel or unusual than death? Taking someone 's life away is the ultimate punishment. This reason is important because the death penalty clearly doesn 't follow what the 8th amendment states.
…show more content…
The government killing someone over a crime is absurd. The only thing that they are doing is adding to the problem. If someone is put to death because they murdered someone, you end up having two people dead instead of just one. There are plenty of other ways to punish criminals that are not so barbaric. We have things like life imprisonment without parole. This would allow the criminal to not only get to live, but prevent them from doing any other crimes. This also follows the 5th amendment which is right to life as well as the 8th amendment which is the government cannot do any harsh or cruel punishments. Justice is brought this way too without more deaths occurring. Also, life without parole allows mistakes to be corrected whereas once the death penalty has been inflicted. It is a fact that “41% of the population would choose the death penalty over a sentence of life without parole coupled with restitution to the victim 's family” (deathpenaltyinfo.org). This means that more people are already on the side of against the death penalty. Since 1996, the decline of people in favor of the death penalty has gone down drastically. The death penalty is inhumane because there are cases where the execution has led to a lot of pain and suffering. For example, “Clayton Locket walked into the execution room, took a seat and was strapped down from head to toe. He was injected with a triple-drug cocktail, and at the point where he should have gone unconscious, he instead experienced a seizure. Struggling against the restraints, he said, “Something’s wrong” (Zakeri). Obviously this has to be classified as inhumane and barbaric because this is basically torture. If you 're going to sentence someone to death the least you can do is make it quick and painless. In this case this person had to suffer through a seizure which is definitely inhumane. The death penalty is definitely unjust and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Burns this punishment should be death, but what about the person’s fundamental rights 's to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Although Burns does not directly address it in this chapter, I believe he feels that when you commit a crime you lose these fundamental rights. But are these not fundamental rights that everyone is guaranteed under the Constitution? Their is no clause in the Constitution that says unless your a murder, you lose these rights. Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    From my understanding, it is supposed to make criminals not commit crimes in order to get on death row but this hasn 't worked and will not work. Laws are intended to correct, by definition laws can’t obey, or isn’t intended to imitate or reproduce that nature of man. (Bedau, Cassell) The law says we can 't follow or obey the nature of man that 's exactly what we 're doing by following through with Capital Punishment. The by putting people on death row and to kill them is exactly what they did was murder because you 're taking someone 's life. This should be the start in stopping the Death Penalty because it 's morally wrong just like murdering is but just because it 's run by the government and the justice system doesn’t make it okay!…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Reasoning - Death Penalty Threatening to kill someone, does that deter crime? The United State remains in the vast minority of nations throughout the world who still uses death as a penalty for certain crimes ("The Death Penalty Worldwide," n.d.). In this paper I will argue that the death penalty should be stopped, it’s morally wrong, expensive, and an ineffective deterrent to crime. The death penalty is both morally and ethically wrong. Society, as a whole, believes that killing another individual is wrong.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for execution just because of what they did. Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New evidence uncovered by reporters Maurice Possley and Steve Mills casts doubt on DeLuna’s guilt and points towards another man, Carlos Hernandez, who had a record of similar crimes and repeatedly confessed to the murder.” This is just one of the many cases where innocent people are killed for no reason. The justice system tends to kill people that are innocent before they find enough evidence or test DNA. This is a bad habit of them, but we wouldn’t have to worry about this if the death penalty was no longer here. According to the US death row study, “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment.” 4.1% is a lot and it may seem like a small number, but its not. Innocent people die from the death penalty and it does happen often.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because of its inhumaneness and lack of moral values. Many people in the United States are facing the punishment of death row. The death penalty is used to kill a person who has been convicted of inhumane crimes. Those who are for the death penalty think it is “ preventing serious harm to innocent people and a weighty reason for using a particular penalty (as in doing justice)”(Davis…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is what separates our mentality from the criminal’s mentality. We have a mind and a conscience that helps us decide what is morally right or wrong. In the article “Death Penalty,” it states how a man sentenced to death testified that he felt his whole body being burnt (Kiener). Problems like these make the death penalty inhumane, giving a strong reason for it not to be legal in America. Why do we need to practice it?…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that killing is always wrong no matter what. If a guy murders another guy and people murder him it’s just one more life gone. I thought that if one human being killed another, they deserved the death penalty. But, you know what that is too good for someone like that. They deserve to rot in prison.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doesn’t that sound absolutely horrid? I believe that the death penalty is wrong because of many reasons. The death penalty should be become illegal because of the possible innocence of people, it’s not used anymore, and of all the inhumane…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Whether it’s a command or not, someone is killing another person. We don’t know if the person who committed the crime was commanded to do it in return to let a loved one live, so why not place that person in jail without parole instead of killing them? Then years later you find out that the person you executed was actually guilty but there’s nothing you could do about it because you took the “easy” way out and killed the person. In the documentary, Deadline from 2004 , the warden said that the death penalty was a gruesome act towards him and other prison guards because it made them look like killers themselves (Document 9). This shows the pressure that wardens themselves feel about having to kill someone making the death penalty a cruel punishment because even people who are not on the death row are affected to even participate in such act.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics