Persuasive Essay Against Death Penalty

Improved Essays
To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok. To them, two wrongs make a right. Through some analysis, it can be found that this logic is flawed. The government should not have the right to kill its own citizens. The death penalty is an inefficient, unreasonable, and immoral policy. It should be banned from the United States. The following is the list of legal reasons for getting sentenced with the death penalty. It includes murder, robbery, resisting arrest, abuse of a miner, arson, kidnapping, rape, aircraft hijacking, …show more content…
Surely at least some of those put onto death row for murder had their reasons for doing what they did. Whether it be good reasons or not, it made sense to them. Well, sentencing someone to capital punishment is in effect killing them. Killing them brings you practically down to the same level as the accused. You are both killing for your own reasons. You both believed that someone deserved to die and caused their life to end. Who is to say that your reason is ok and there reason is not? Both reasons are no good reasons, because there is no good reason. If killing is wrong, then no one should kill. Unless you have to kill for self-preservation, there should be no one way to make killing the right …show more content…
If a parent’s child gets murdered, shouldn’t they get the satisfaction of seeing the killer follow? Life in prison, in most cases, would actually be better for the family. Once someone is sentenced to life in prison it is over, they are stuck in a cell until they die and the family can begin piecing their life back together. However, the death sentence often comes with numerous retrials, not allowing the family to heal. They spend years reliving the case and the horrible memories that come with it. Knowing the guilty party is stuck in jail till the day they die should be retribution

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Burns this punishment should be death, but what about the person’s fundamental rights 's to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Although Burns does not directly address it in this chapter, I believe he feels that when you commit a crime you lose these fundamental rights. But are these not fundamental rights that everyone is guaranteed under the Constitution? Their is no clause in the Constitution that says unless your a murder, you lose these rights. Allowing the government to legally kill the guilty person is wrong, and violates this person’s legal rights.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    For most it 's the one everyone would guess; They say the Death Penalty is necessary because it serves as a warning to criminals, provides closure for the victims and the only punishment fit for murder? So murdering is fit for killing someone who has just murdered another person. ("English 15." English 15. N.p., 11 Nov.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty, also known as capital punishment or death sentence, is a legal punishment due to which a person is ordered to be killed by the state because of a crime that person has committed. The Death penalty has been misused against minorities and political foes by those in power in the past and possibility of this happening still prevails. Capital…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The death penalty digresses from that notion, thereby devaluing the life of that individual. Some opponents to capital punishment strongly believe that no crime should be used to deprive an individual of their lives, irrespective of the offense. The second line of argument is that everyone has the right to live. Just because a person has taken the life of another or committed a crime that can be classified as capital crime, should be used as a premise to deprive the individual of his/ her life. Some may argue that individuals can forfeit their human rights to live, when they commit heinous crimes like taking the lives of other individuals.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pens Of The Death Penalty

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore a murderer shouldn’t be murdered as a punishment. It will just lead to more murderers. We can’t do the same thing as the criminal did to their victim(s). The death penalty doesn’t solve anything. It’s effectiveness is deterrent.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several reasons why the death penalty is a good idea. One reason is that it is a warning. Death is scary because it is something no one knows about. Criminals know they will be put to death if they commit murder. They don’t want to die.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The anger at the criminal justice system for not finding the actual culprit and the shame that they were forced to pay for the execution would be enough to change their minds on whether the death penalty should be abolished or not. According to Garrett (2011), he reveals that due to the incompetence, abuse and errors of the criminal justice system, there has been “Evidence corrupted by suggestive eyewitness procedures, coercive interrogations, unsound and unreliable forensics, shoddy investigative practices, cognitive bias, and poor lawyering illustrates the weaknesses built into our current criminal justice system”(Garrett, 2011, p367). He proposes that “practical reforms that rely more on documented, recorded, and audited evidence and less on fallible human memory”(Garrett, 2011, p367). He explains that DNA exonerations have “shattered the confidence in the criminal justice system by exposing how often we have convicted the innocent and let the guilty walk free” (Garrett, 2011, p367). Educating the public about alternatives, such as, life in prison, instead…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Put plainly, if an action (P) causes pain or death on another individual (Q) then the action is morally wrong and should not be done. In this case there is a very clear violation of this premise. Not only does the murderer cause physical pain to his victim by maiming him, he ended by killing his victim and then, to make things worse, consumed some of the victims flesh. So it is clear that since the actions of Mr. Meiwes (p) inflicted suffering and ultimately death on his victim, Mr. Brandes, the event was morally wrong and Mr. Meiwes could not have been acting in any morally acceptable way. This premise is true due to the fact that since no one would willingly bring any sort of suffering upon themselves, it is completely wrong to bring any suffering on another person.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephen Nathanson, who wrote “An eye for an eye?” suggests the factual and moral beliefs about the death penalty are wrong and need to be strictly abolished. The passage states, “ A person’s actions, it seems, provide not only a basis for a moral appraisal of the person but also a guide to how he should be treated”. Also stated, “ What people deserve as recipients of rewards or punishments is determined by what they do as agents”. The argument claiming people should get a punishment based on what they do is accurate. What is not accurate however, is suggesting if someone murders another person, they should receive capital punishment.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lethal Justice Imagine being placed on death row by a system that is executing people for committing crimes. One simple revengeful court ruling can end a life forever. If someone commits a crime he should be punished, but should he be executed for his crime? Is it acceptable for a citizen to kill someone? If not, why is it acceptable for our justice system to carry out this punishment?…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays