Persuasive Essay About The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
My persuasive essay is about the death penalty. I do not think that the death penalty should be allowed in the United States because of the fact it cost a lot of money and our government cannot afford to spend thousands and millions of dollars to harm another human being. And if we have a death penalty what if that person who was sentenced to death and already died was innocent for that crime. For instance there was a colored man in jail for armed robbery and let’s say he was protecting the clerk with a firearm because of the reason being the robber had a gun so he pointed his weapon at the robber and the police show up and the robber fleas and the colored man gets put in jail. But nobody tried to prostitute the robber. So the judge sentences …show more content…
Because they can’t bring him back from the dead and give him back to them and say sorry. That would make our government look horrible and that would make the police force look horrible to because there could always be that chance that the individual was an African American then other people would say that the government or the police force is racist. Then the country or state would have a riot and would half or maybe even forced to kill or harm other people just for them to look like a bad person when in other people’s eyes they would say “They did not half to kill anyone.” And a number of people would agree with that person. Also other families could sue the government because the government killed an innocent person and the government would be stuck because they gave the executioner the go ahead to kill a person who did nothing to deserve it.
In conclusion I do not think that the death penalty should not be active anywhere. Not in any other state or country because of the fact being that a judge has a choice and that judge could always just give out death penalties and not know the full story of what happen. Killing another human would not even have any consequence to any of the other criminals because if anything what if crime would just raise and there goes the economy and the government because there will be riots

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People executed or put on death row, in my opinion, are only put there as revenge for the victim. The execution is not justifying the convicted criminal’s actions, but rather the execution is only “retribution” for the crime they committed. When considering the survey in 2010, most people are against the death penalty, and even the families of the victim(s) say they would rather not have the pain and guilt of murdering another human being. If the family of a victim would rather have the criminal imprisoned, then why doesn’t the government feel the same way? There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How can we say justice is served by executing someone’s beloved? A man may take another man’s life but who are we to say he should be beheaded? Life is not fair, no one wants to see a killer living when our loved ones are gone but we must not forget that they are also someone’s beloved. No man should have the power to decide another man’s life or death since everyone is equal. Execution is not only cruel but can also lead to killing an innocent man, and it costs millions for one death penalty and sometimes put innocent’s life at risk, more importantly there is no taking back once it is done.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opposing The Death Penalty

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What this information should tell us is that we are incapable of deciding whether someone should receive capital punishment or not based solely on the facts of the case. Our nature dictates that our personal biases will always play a part in the final decision. We cannot give ourselves the power to kill if we cannot be just in deciding who dies. If the death penalty was truly invented for the greater good and intended to protect society, then punishment would be based on the facts of the crime alone. Race would never be factored in to the decision.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is impossible to believe that human beings have nothing to do with guns killing people. I know for a fact that guns don’t make decisions and decide who and for what reason they are going to kill. If guns were never created by people, then people wouldn’t have to worry about them. If guns…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Death Penalty: Killing Hundreds of Humans Each year less than hundreds of humans are killed...legally. The death penalty is something used to the criminals that have done a horrific crime such as man slaughter, mass killings, etc. The death penalty is something that is used when the police officers and/or judge has decided that the criminal does not deserve to live after the crimes he or she has done. The death penalty should not be used because it is cruel, hypocritical, and not a good alternative. The death penalty has the crowd of people saying no the death penalty should not be allowed.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty should not be allowed in any country because of its bad influence. The death penalty has the risk of executing an innocent person. Everyone in death row has the right to a second chance to life. Sometime there is no evidence for execution just because of what they did. Other countries use the death penalty to punish their political opponents.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Violence Argument

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Weapons should not be sold not be sold by a private sellers or online because it creates an opportunity for dangerous people to bypass a background check with no questions asked. The presence of a gun makes a conflict more likely to become violent. The FBI found that in 2013 argument such as romantic triangles and brawls caused and fueled by drugs and alcohol, and arguments over money resulted in 1,962 gun deaths 59.9% of the total. Two thirds of the 7,900 deaths in 1981 involving arguments and brawls were caused by guns. If these individuals aren't allowed allowed to own firearms it would prevent a lot of gun violence.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of these opponents is Hugo Bedau. The first argument that Bedau brings up about the death penalty is that he believes that it is no more a deterrent than life in prison and if somebody is going to kill someone they likely won’t think about whether they get the death penalty or life in prison. For example, he brings up the case of premeditated murders and how the murderer in these cases not only plans the crime but the escape also so if the murderer believes he or she will get away then it won’t matter to them whether the death penalty would be their punishment or not. He brings up that in many different occasions the idea of increasing the number of executions per year has been brought up in court and ruled unconstitutional. One of these occasions being Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (Hugo Bedau, The Case Against the Death Penalty, July, 1992).…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The eight men had no right to murder Jack Moore and Anthony Stuckey. Moore and Stuckey should have been punished by the legal system, not by the vigilantes. One offense doesn’t justify another, especially since the vigilantes did not officially know at the time if Moore and Stuckey had actually killed any of the woman that they had run into (“Getting Away with Murder”). The vigilantes should have let the legal system run its course. Vigilante justice is never a positive thing, and this statement becomes indisputable when reading And Then There Were None and “Getting Away with…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrary to what the media would have you believe, stern gun control laws will not prevent mass shootings, detour criminals, nor will it make our neighborhoods any safer. After the Sandy Hook and San Bernardino shootings where 20 first-graders and 14 county workers lost their lives, victims and the media painted a picture that stiffer gun control laws would have averted such a massacre. However, this could not be further from the truth. Being that both weapons were…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays