Essay Arguing for Death Penalty

Improved Essays
When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient.
I. Monetary Cost
a. Texas
i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii. On average the indictment to the enactment
…show more content…
California
i. California has the highest amount of spending at 114 million dollars annually beyond the cost of just keeping the convicts in jail for life (Jacqueline Brux). ii. The Sacramento Bee a newspaper publication in Sacramento, California states that if the state of California were to remove the death penalty entirely it would add 90 million dollars back into the economy. 78 million of the 90 million for expenses at the trial level alone. (DPIC 2)
c. North Carolina
i. The death penalty costs 2.16 million dollars per execution than the imprisonment of convicted murders for a lifetime (Jacqueline Brux). ii. Philip J Cook a Duke professor states that if the death penalty was repealed it would save the state 21 million dollars of cases in just the trial phase.
II. Time
a. Colorado
i. In Colorado a study of the death penalty efficiency and functionality showed that it took six times the amount of days to pass one death penalty case than it did to pass one life-without-parole case. ii. Life-without-parole cases also only took roughly 24.5 hours of in court time to be resolved. Lastly Life-without parole cases took an average of 526 days to complete whilst it takes 4 years on average for a death penalty case.( DPIC 2 )
b.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    With the death penalty comes the expense of it. Why should the Department of criminal justice pay millions of dollars on one execution when the person who will be executed more than likely didn’t spend any money on the person that they killed? The justice departments have been using the defense that the death penalty will help to cut back on crime and use it as a deterrent effect, but in reality it does little to actually change the amount of crimes that are being committed. The book, Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies talks about how one of politicians main focuses now when discussing crime and the effects of it on the community is that they “worry about appearing soft on crime”. When determining if the death penalty is an efficient…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that there is a better way to sentence someone rather then sentence them to death. I think there should be no death penalty because one, it costs way too much. Second, we are taking a life, someone’s child. Finally, the poor are more likely to get the death penalty. There are many more reasons why we should get rid of it…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ted Bundy Case

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A charming young man with a bright political future, Ted Bundy would commit travesties that the world could not have possibly predicted. A serial rapist and murderer, Bundy eventually admitted to killing 36 women, with most experts believing the actual number to be over 100 (“Capital Punishment”). When the shocking evidence was revealed, Bundy was convicted and sentenced to death. During his nine years on death row, he cost taxpayers over 5 million dollars and received three extensions on his execution (“Capital Punishment”). While the majority of Americans felt Bundy deserved his punishment, the price of Bundy’s trial leaves many debating the merit of a system that uses millions to carry out the execution of one man.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nebraska Death Penalty

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In August of 2016 there was a study of costs of Nebraska’s death penalty done by Dr. Ernest Gross, a Creighton University economics professor who founded the conservation think tank, Goss & Associates, he found that the state spends $14.6 million per year to maintain its capital punishment. The study was called The Economic impact of the Death Penalty on the State of Nebraska: A Taxpayer Burden? , it also estimated that each death penalty prosecution cost Nebraska’s taxpayers about $1.5 million more than a life without parole prosecution. Dr. Gross estimated that the death penalty costs states with capital punishment an average of $23.2 million more per year than alternative sentences. The study’s shown that states with death penalty spent about 3.54% of overall state budgets on court, corrections, and other criminal justice functions associated with the death penalty, while states without the death penalty spend about 2.93% on those…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty shouldn’t be allowed in the United States because it costs too much to execute them rather than putting them in prison. The amount of times they have executed the wrong person makes a big error in our system. It costs too much to execute people instead of putting them in prison. Putting someone on death row costs more than $1 million because they have to hire expensive lawyers to deal with their cases since they’re so complicated. If they hired a cheap lawyer they would end up on death row a majority of the cases.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Passaro Case

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maintaining the death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. The death penalty is enormously expensive with no clear benefits. Now the real question at hand is, is it worth it to give these criminals something that they are already wanting - the death penalty - and really have no justice served? Some may argue that the price for the execution of a murderer is very much beneficial because they are no longer standing in our society. Most of these sayings are biased because their wanting of the death penalty is tied in with morals.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why do we chose to kill criminals when we are trying to show other people that killing is wrong? Many americans think we are civilized but they are not. We have executed more criminals than any other country have. I don't believe we should give death penalties to criminals because it’s going against the Eighth Amendment, violating human rights and government is going into a economic decline. Even though the Eighth Amendment states that cruel and unusual punishment should not be allowed in the United Stated, we still have death penalties.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With many people being sentenced the death penalty it begins to become expensive. It costs more to execute a person than to keep him or he confined in prison for life. There has been 1,435 executions since 1976 the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. In some cases the inmate was innocent, but it may be too late because he or she has already been put to death. Then there is money lost and a life taken away for no…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Death penalty case cost… [per execution] a median of 1.26 million. Non death penalty case cost through the end of incarceration [had] a median cost $740,000” (Amnesty international). The U.S continually spends cash on the a solution that does not even help the cause of decreasing the crime rate in America. The U.S would rather spend millions on the ending of someone´s life rather than…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In North Carolina, a study performed found that there would be a $2 million difference between a death sentence and a life without parole sentence. It has been found that a death penalty case costs about $3 million, which is three times the cost of 40 years imprisonment of an inmate (Cuomo, 1956). I think that the death penalty should be abolished, but should be replaced with a punishment that has a similar effect but is less expensive. True life imprisonment seems more effective than the capital punishment. To most inmates, the thought of spending the rest of their lives behind bars only to die in a cell is worse than a quick death by lethal injection.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty has been used for thousands of years, dating all the way back to Hammurabi’s Code in the 1700s BC, which is most known for its famous line, “an eye for an eye”. It is still in use today, and is the subject of much controversy for a few main reasons. One, some people question the ethics of killing someone. Two, it costs an average of $90,000 more per year per prisoner to keep a prisoner on death row as opposed to a normal jail, according to Rone Tempest, award-winning author of the Goldsmith Prize for Investigative Reporting, in Death Penalty Focus: The High Cost of the Death Penalty. This money comes from taxpayers, which is the main reason that the cost of the death penalty causes so much controversy.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial subject in today’s culture and being a criminal justice major; this topic has a lot of interest to me. If I had to classify myself in a group that dealt with capital punishment, I would consider myself a retentionist. I am all for punishing the guilty and giving murders the punishment they deserve. Not only in my eyes, but the eyes of all retentionists, we believe that the main reason we should punish the offender is because they morally deserve it. I truly believe that the death penalty is morally permissible.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s Time to Kill the Death Penalty America is the home of the free, the brave and apparently the vindictive if our embrace of capital punishment is any indication of our national character. We tout our love of human rights for all the world to see yet we imprison more people than China or Russia. We still execute people when according to Amnesty International nearly two-thirds of countries around the world have abolished the practice. America cannot be that city on the hill that history tells us we should be when our government is killing people under the guise of justice. America, it is time to kill the death penalty once and for all as it is does not deter crime, it is expensive in terms of the monetary cost to tax payers, and more importantly,…

    • 1352 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    settle death penalty cases with skyrocketing funds. Nick Gillespie discusses these principles in his video called: “Three Reasons to Get Rid of the Death Penalty”. He states that since 1980, California has spent over four billion dollars on death penalty cases; yet has only executed thirteen inmates. The U.S. also annually dishes out 134 million dollars per case concerning the death penalty. This is far more expensive than the cost that would be covered for incarcerating the criminals for life without parole (Gillespie).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays