Personal Narrative: A Career As A Supreme Court Judge

Improved Essays
The job I was interested in was a judge, specifically a Supreme Court judge. The duty of the supreme court judge is to finalize laws involving Congress and making sure The Constitution is still followed. It keeps the laws in order and makes sure that equality is reached. According to Scholastic "The Role of the Supreme Court," "The Supreme Court is like a referee on a football field. The Congress, the President, the state police, and other government officials are the players. Some can pass laws, and others can enforce laws. But all exercise power within certain boundaries. These boundaries are set by the Constitution. As the "referee" in the U.S. system of government, it is the Supreme Court's job to say when government officials step out-of-bounds." …show more content…
I enjoy being the mediator between two people and that's what being a judge is. Organizing documents, finalizing cases, and researching legal problems and have opinions on them are each something I do already but on a smaller scale. I am an official member of the San Pablo Youth Commission. I'm the secretary so my job is the organize the paperwork and type out the events of the meetings, when we come together we finalize decisions to make and we research laws of San Pablo and rules people break and how we can help fix San Pablo using those laws. This takes strong leadership skills, which leads to my interest code. I received AIS artistic, investigative, and social. So, I'm creative, a thinker, and a helper. The interest code for judges are EI enterprising and investigative so you'll have to be a persuader and a thinker. I believe as a judge there isn't much persuading. You aren't the one trying to convince a jury, that's the lawyers. I think judges are closer to social because they are the helpers. They are given evidence and they have to clear it up for the judges. They make sure each lawyer get an even amount of time and attention to the jury. That's just what I

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “I do believe to be a judge you must be a lawyer first to know what you are doing as judge,” she said. “For example lets say someone has to rule on questions about evidence, the decision has to be made a quick and I having tried of a lot cases I’m familiar with how cases should be ruled.” With those experience in mind Theall suggested a change in requirement to the 10 years of practicing law that is required to run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal. “There is a minimum of 10 years to run for this positions,” she said. “You do not know you are as a lawyer in 10 years…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bowdoin Lacrosse Themes

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In regards to other time commitments, my only other significant non-academic activity with be Bowdoin Lacrosse. The lacrosse team takes up a significant portion of my time but the various practices and miscellaneous activities do not leave me with no time to focus on other endeavors. I structure my schedule in such a way that it allows me to participate in other activities, so my involvement with Bowdoin Lacrosse will not pose an issue to any time commitments regarding the Judicial…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Process

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is the role of the prosecutor in the plea bargaining process? The role of the prosecutor in a Plea-bargaining process is to get the defendant to come to an agreement to where the defendant pleads guilty to some or many of the charges filed against them therefore bypassing a costly trial preceding. The prosecutor usually offers a reduced punishment if the defendants agrees to their terms. In some jurisdictions prosecutors and the defendant can work with the judges to help them determine what the sentence they will get if they accept the plea bargain. As prosecutor, what would you recommend in an attempt to resolve the case and why?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roe V. Wade Case Analysis

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The role of the supreme court is to rule on whether a law or action is constitutional or not. Cases are brought to the court and argued in front of the supreme court justices. These cases have to do with the rights of the people and can have a major impact on US laws. Sometimes state laws are overturned because they are determined to be unconstitutional.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Landmark Decisions of the Supreme Court Since the late 1700s, the Supreme Court has been operating as the highest federal court in the United States of America. “Defined by Article III, Section I of the Constitution, the Supreme Court operates under nine Justices, who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Each Justice holds office for life as long as they are well behaved,” (“Supreme Court Procedures”) The Supreme Court functions by deciding what case to choose, listening to oral arguments, then reaching a decision on each case.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Marshall was known as the greatest chief justice in history, did you know that the Liberty Bell rang so loudly at his funeral that it cracked? The Constitution of the United States created three branches of government, in which includes the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. These branches were established to ensure that our government is effective, and that citizen’s right are protected. The Judicial branch of the government has the main purpose of interpreting the laws, it keeps the legislative and executive branches in check, and makes decisions that influence us and our country.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When the constitution was written in 1787 the three branches of government were established. Those were the judiciary, the executive, and the legislative. In the past three hundred years not much concerning the running of these has been changed. Each branch depends and checks on the others to create an even balance of power within the government. This was created specifically to make sure no one branch can take too much control over the others.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract In this paper I will be arguing whether or not judges are political. I will utilize the methods of judge selection, term limitations, and human nature to defend my argument. I also plan to argue that judges should remain political. In 1789, Article III of the United States Constitution established the Judicial Branch of government.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judicial branch encompasses the judges and justices of the state and federal courts. First, we will examine the nomination and appointment process and how it differs from Supreme Court Justices. Then, we’ll analyze how the selection judges and justices and length of terms differ between Supreme Court Justices and members of Congress. Lastly, we’ll take a look at ways that Judges and Justice may be removed from office. Overall, the constitution lays out the framework for a complicated justice system, which differs greatly from the other branches of government.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Emma Raabe Mrs. Roger American Government 3 March 2017 Each year the United States Supreme Court is requested to take on nearly seven-thousand court cases, but are only able to accept approximately eighty. This statistic is an evident indication of how important the Supreme Court truly is. As the head of the judicial branch, this major court not only makes the final decisions on high level cases, but also has to answer to those who oppose the decisions that they have agreed upon. Also because the Supreme Court is the highest court, it is in charge of all smaller federal courts, which sets the standards for the entire nation’s justice system.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was the start of building America up into what we see today and has lasted for over 200 years. Its inception as the Articles of Confederation or the “hand-shake” among states, grew into something more united (U.S. Constitution signed, n.d.). With the signing of the Constitution of the United States in 1787, the republic government was formed and established the three branches of government with overlapping powers. The three branches include the Legislative, Executive and Judicial organizations.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hollard Primary Interest

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The O*NET On-line provides careers information, John Hollard’s codes I also provides codes in social, conventional, and enterprising. In my Interest Profiler Score Report, my primary interest area is social and my secondary interest area was conventional. My primary interest is social. Its known individuals with social interest like working with others to help them learn and grow. They like working with people more than working with objects, machines, or information.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the Judicial branch then evaluates the laws, and check if they are constitutional or unconstitutional. This process is called Checks and Balances, “The system of separate institutions sharing some powers… its purpose is to keep power divided among the three branches” (Turner,27). By this definition not one power is meant to be all powerful, although…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays