Why Supreme Court Is Important

Improved Essays
Emma Raabe
Mrs. Roger
American Government
3 March 2017

Each year the United States Supreme Court is requested to take on nearly seven-thousand court cases, but are only able to accept approximately eighty. This statistic is an evident indication of how important the Supreme Court truly is. As the head of the judicial branch, this major court not only makes the final decisions on high level cases, but also has to answer to those who oppose the decisions that they have agreed upon. Also because the Supreme Court is the highest court, it is in charge of all smaller federal courts, which sets the standards for the entire nation’s justice system. Through deciding whether or not a law is constitutional, or being the decision maker to some of America’s
…show more content…
As the head of the Judicial Branch it is their job to not only check and balance the other branches out, but to rightfully grant anyone and everyone to a fair and speedy trial just as the Sixth Amendment promises. It is also their job to make sure that everyone other federal court in the U.S. justice system is rightfully going through a proper case process and doing their jobs correctly. Lastly, a major responsibility of the Supreme Court is to determine what laws are constitutional or not. The justices in the Supreme Court are the deciding factors on what is a proper law and they get to determine exactly how that law is …show more content…
Explain why it is imperative we have all justices filled.
Explain the current decision making process and possible candidates for that role in the justice system.

-Conclusion:
Restate my thesis.
Restate my contentions once again (while not being too repetitive by saying the exact same thing).
Apply the information found in the essay, and verify the importance of my argument.

Works Cited
Borchers, Patrick J. "Is The Supreme Court Really Going To Regulate Choice Of Law Involving States?." Creighton Law Review 50.1 (2016): 7. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 9 Feb. 2017.

Segall, Eric J. "The Constitution Means What The Supreme Court Says It Means." Harvard Law Review 129.4 (2016): 176. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 9 Feb. 2017.

Smith, Christopher E. "What If?: Human Experience And Supreme Court Decision Making On Criminal Justice." Marquette Law Review 99.3 (2016): 813. Advanced Placement Source. Web. 9 Feb. 2017.

"The Court as an Institution." Home - Supreme Court of the United States. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2017.

U.S. Supreme Court." The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Feb.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Autonomy In DA

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When dealing with autonomy is generally centered base on management of prosecutorial, this enables the assistant district attorney to have the freedom to make his or her own decisions. In some DA’s office there typically written policies regarding cases. Attempting to control the supervision of the assistants tend to erode the morale of the office ( Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. 2014). However, this can help reduce a lot of mistakes from the assistant by reviewing all cases to ensure that policies are been followed this only makes the DA assistant more uncomfortable because they feel that they’re trusted.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Paper

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis This paper will discuss the cases of: Weeks v United States, Mapp v Ohio, Gideon v Wainwright and Scott v Harris. This paper will discuss which of these cases was the most important and it has impacted the criminal justice system. Each of these four Cases answered questions that influenced the criminal justice system to a whole new level.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Judicial Branch is in charge of interpreting laws and the Constitution, this helps keep checks & balances, it stop Congress from passing bad laws, or just any law that they want to. Alexander Hamilton put it this way, the legislative branch writes the rules that we abide by, while the executive branch “holds the sword of the community” by enforcing the laws (Doc. B). All the judicial branch does is judge whether laws are constitutional, to avoid having a law that violates the Constitution, so it doesn’t pose any harm to the government. It helps keep balance between all the branches and to keep everything…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proper Interpretation (Meese) The interpretation of the Constitution has been a controversial issue between people in the government. In A Jurisprudence of Original Intention by Edwin Meese III, Meese provides an article with the intention of telling his audience the importance of interpreting the Constitution properly. Meese highlights the idea that all courts in the United States have to base their decisions strictly from the Constitution. It is evident that Meese wants a strict interpretation of the Constitution.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Advantages

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As it is hard to define freedom, it is also hard to asses if it is guaranteed or denied (Walton and Smith 2). The Supreme Court uses the powers given to it by the constitution to make final judgements proceeding to bringing equal justice and freedom into practice. The 1st amendment guarantees freedom of religion, expression, assembly and the right to petition. On the other hand the 14th amendment was to make sure that all people born in the U.S. were citizens and were to be given the full and equal benefits of the laws .…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison Supreme Court case, Chief Justice John Marshall’s majority decision revolutionized the interpretation of Section 1 according, Section 2 of Article 3 in the US Constitution. Marshall first stated in his speech that “it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” This reveals that Marshall believes the Supreme Court’s duty or job is to determine what the law is. He then says that “if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each… if a law be in opposition to the Constitution...…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Marbury never got his deserved commission, the Court’s ruling set a very important precedent for the American judicial system. Without the case, the Supreme Court would have been a lifeless authority with no real power. It also shed very deserved light on the importance of judicial review, in other words, gave the supreme court the power and authority that it needed to have the final say when the situation involves legality. Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison. (McBride,…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, judicial supremacy has taken power away from the states. For example, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people (“Tenth”). Article III of the Constitution, in granting power to the judiciary, extends judicial power to various types of cases, but never gives them the right to strike down a legislative or executive action (Kramer). However, since the decision in Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court has claimed the final word on what the Constitution means, so state provisions that conflict must yield to those interpretations (Dennison). Instead of the legislative branch, which represents the people, constructing important American laws, the court now holds the…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in the country and the head of the judicial branch. The Supreme Court is responsible for being the final judge in all cases involving Congress and the Constitution and their decisions can have great impact on the country. These decisions or opinions have an important impact on country as they rule on what Congress can or cannot do and how the constitution applies to the country. The decisions of the Supreme Court have a profound impact on the United States and how the country operates. After Supreme Court justices have discussed a case Justices draft opinions that will be used as the final decision about a case.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Justice Stephen Breyer Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the United States government 's history, one thing remains the same, the three branches of government are as important as each other in keeping the nation thriving. Each with their unique set of strengths and weaknesses, the Judicial Branch is one that comes to mind when thinking of having the most powerful strength, proving a system of checks and balances to the other government branches. The Judicial Branch is responsible for reviewing the constitutionality of the actions of the government, according to Fine & Levin-Waldman (2016). What this means is, when something is signed into law or actions are taken, the Supreme Court of the United States decides if it follows the rights and laws outlined in the US Constitution. According to…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural Law Theory

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Interpreting the Constitution of the United States of America has always been a challenge for Supreme Court justices throughout America’s history. Many justices have tried to interpret the Constitution based on the social consequences of their ruling in comparison to the historical context behind the law being debated. The rift between adapting the Constitution in order for it to keep up with changing times and maintaining the original intentions of the framers poses many difficulties for the justices when interpreting the validity of a law in comparison to the Constitution. Because of this dilemma, various theories about how to efficiently interpret the Constitution have been created to help to the justices properly elaborate on the various…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays