Supreme Court Case Paper

Improved Essays
Thesis
This paper will discuss the cases of: Weeks v United States, Mapp v Ohio, Gideon v Wainwright and Scott v Harris. This paper will discuss which of these cases was the most important and it has impacted the criminal justice system. Each of these four Cases answered questions that influenced the criminal justice system to a whole new level.
Mapp v Ohio:
Police illegally entered the home of Dollree Mapp without a warrant. Officers were initially searching her home for a fugitive, but instead they found that she had possessed obscene (pornographic) materials. Consequently she was convicted, and then she appealed conviction on the basis of freedom of expression. The Supreme Court then ruled the illegally obtained evidence must be excluded
…show more content…
When Gideon appeared in court without a lawyer, he requested for one to be appointed to him. Under Florida state law, the courts did not have to grant him with a lawyer so they didn’t. Gideon then took the case to the Supreme Court because he thought that it violated his sixth amendment, which is a right to council. The Supreme Court then determined that the framers of the constitution believed that the accused should have the means to put up a proper defense (fair trial) as stated in the Sixth Amendment, which is the right to counsel. This means that State and Federal courts are required to appoint attorneys for defendants that cannot afford to retain counsel on their own.
Scott v Harris:
Deputy Timothy Scott attempted to pull over Victor Harris for speeding. Harris then fled in his vehicle, creating a high speed car chase. This resulted in Deputy Scott attempting to end the chase by ramming Harris 's vehicle with his police cruiser, rendering Harris a quadriplegic. As a result, the Court determined that a police officer to use deadly force to prevent harm to innocent bystanders if needed. This ruling also means that they can do this even if they are putting the criminal in serious risk of injury or death.
The most important

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A young man saw him and served as a witness against Gideon. At trial, he was charged with a felony for breaking and entering a private facility. When it came time for trial, he went to court without an attorney because he couldn’t afford one, he was too poor. However, he asked the judge to appoint him counsel but the trial judge denied the request because under Florida Law, it was solely permitted to appoint counsel to defendants who were poor that were charged capital offenses. Gideon ended up having to represent himself in the court and though speaking to the jury and making statements arguing that he was innocent, they found him guilty of the charge and were sent to prison for five years.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court affirmed that there were no discernible injuries inflicted and that the force used good faith effort to maintain or restore order in the face of a potentially explosive. Conclusion: The Supreme Court concluded the case to be vacated and remanded the judgement made by the Appellate Court. The court’s findings was the amount of force used by the officers was excessive and request the Appellate Court to reconsider their…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He appeared in court without an attorney, but Gideon asked the court to appoint one for him. FL law only allowed counsel to be appointed for indigents when a defendant was charged with a capital crime. The court refused to appoint an attorney for him, and he was found guilty and sentenced to prison. Instead…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After being denied entry, they left and subsequently returned with a faux search warrant. After this, they promptly entered the residence with force and conducted a search. With this search, they did not find the suspect but instead found obscene materials which were illegal in the state of Ohio. Using the evidence, the officers brought her to trial and she was then convicted for the possession of these materials. The main premise of the case is whether or not evidence obtained illegally can be used as evidence against a suspect.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The judge denied his request on behalf of the Florida state laws. According to the judge the law in Florida states that a counsel can only be appointed to a defendant, if the crime is a capital offense (Cohen, 2013). However, the Florida judge was wrong the Florida law does prohibit Gideon to be appointed an attorney thus violating his 6th amendment right. Therefore, Bob has the right to have a counsel appointed to him as proven in the Gideon v. Wainwright case.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lord Gideon Case Summary

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The court justify their verdict because of the sixth amendment that guarantee of counsel. It’s a basic right that is absolutely necessary to a fair trial that you should be appointed an attorney if you cannot afford one yourself. They based their decision on that Gideon's conviction was unconstitutional because he was denied a defense lawyer at trial. (Bright B., 2013) As a result of the decision he was given another trial with an appointed lawyer this time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other exceptions include open fields, canine sniff, booking search and inventory, public safety, and officer safety. The purpose for this rule can be looked at like a way for law enforcements to conduct searches and seizures that do not violate the Fourth Amendment and individuals that have had their rights violated. This legal rule first made its appearance during the U.S. Supreme court case Weeks v. United States (1914). Freemont Weeks was arrested under suspicion of using the U.S. mail to transmit lottery tickets.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    United States. In this case, the court ruled 5-3, declaring that the government’s ability to freeze a defendant 's non-tainted assets during a trial violated the constitution. This is relevant because the court reasoned that without access to proper funds, a defendant might not be able to provide themselves with adequate counsel for their trial. In Glossip v. Gross, the Supreme Court affirmed in a divided 5-4 judgement that the burden of proof required to classify Oklahoma’s use of midazolam, a sedative, as cruel and unusual punishment had indeed not been met. These recent instances of the Constitution’s interpretation have shed an ever growing light on how the American justice system works and the continuing understanding of the United States Constitution.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION Appellate litigation has played a major role in the development and progress of the Unite States. One case in particular, Gideon v. Wainwright, stands out to me as it has been one of the many motivating factors in my decision to purse of law degree. Gideon v. Wainwright, a case involving an indigent man by the name Clarence Gideon, who was denied counsel. This case not only changed America when the supreme court ruled the government must provide free counsel to accused criminals who cannot afford counsel for themselves, but this case as also had a huge impact on my family life and in my decision making when it came to my career path. GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT Clarence Gideon was charged with breaking an entry into a pool hall in Florida.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Gideon's Trumpet

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gideon feels as though he was denied due process of law, as he simply could not afford an attorney, and therefore he was unable to effectively defend himself in court. Therefore, he files a petition to the Supreme Court, and mails his request from the Florida State…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Fourth Amendment

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After losing an appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, Mapp took her case to the U.S. Supreme Court. When brought to the U.S. Supreme court they determined that the evidence obtained through a search that violates the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state courts. (”Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Exclusionary…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I went to Kings County Supreme Court. Its located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn NY at September 21 at 2:30 pm to 4:40 pm under Honor Francois A. Rivera from Part 52. The case type was civil and type of the proceedings is a trial. There were 8 jurors in the stand. Mostly male and about 2 females juror.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights John Barron was a business owner of a wharf that was located on the Baltimore’s harbor in the deepest part. In 1815, the city of Baltimore decided to do improvements to their streets, which in turn diverted streams this caused the soil in front of Barron’s wharf to build up. In a little over 6 years the soil build up made it where ships could no longer tie up at the wharf. John Barron had to go out of business. In return, John sued the city of Baltimore in state court for the ruin of his wharf business.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays