Justice Stephen Brreyer Research Paper

Great Essays
Justice Stephen Breyer
Justice Stephen Breyer has been on the Supreme Court for almost 22 years. He was confirmed to the court by the Senate on June 29, 1994. Justice Breyer’s confirmation was not a surprise considering how highly qualified he was, as well as, how highly others thought of him. For most of Breyer’s adult life he has had an influential role in the legal field. This paper will summarize Justice Stephen Breyer’s early life through today. We will also analyze his jurisprudence in deciding a few classic, precedential, and controversial cases. Stephen Breyer was born on August 15th, 1938, in San Francisco, California to Irving and Anne Breyer. Breyer was born with the law in his blood, as his father was a lawyer for the San Francisco
…show more content…
Edward Kennedy wanted President Carter to nominate Breyer to be on the court of Appeals for 1st Circuit (Eizenstat, 1). Breyer helped Ted Kennedy on the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, which helped deregulate the airline industry. Kennedy thought very highly of Breyer, and assumed there would be no problem in getting him appointed by President Carter to the Court of Appeals. However, there was a bit of potential controversy to his nomination. Kennedy was worried that Senator Strom Thurmond, a republican, would not allow a democrat to fill the court’s vacancy. Rather than there being any sort of dispute to the nomination, Senator Thurmond actually praised Breyer at the hearing, ultimately leading to his confirmation (Eizenstat, 2). As expected, President Carter did not hesitate to nominate and Breyer was confirmed by a vote of 80-10 by the …show more content…
Breyer clearly believes that the Constitution should be interpreted in a way that positively affects what is happening in society now. Society has changed since the Constitution was created over 200 years ago .Breyer also stated that he uses six interpretive tools when examining a case —text, history, tradition, precedent, the purpose of a statute, and the consequences (Lithwick ). Breyer obviously wants to make sure that his decision in a case does not have results that negatively affect society.
There are many interesting facts about Justice Breyer. Breyer has been involved in three serious bicycle accidents since the 1990’s. The first accident happened around the time he was being considered to take Byron White’s seat on the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, Bill Clinton ended up nominating Justice Ginsburg instead. Justice Breyer has a younger brother who is a district court judge in California. Justice Breyer enjoys bird watching and he also loves to cook. Most random and surprising, Justice Breyer was robbed by intruder with a machete while on vacation in the Caribbean (“Stephen Breyer Fast

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book is written to address particularly voters to awaken them up with regard to their powers to elect whoever they like to serve in the judicial systems of the Supreme Court (Sutherland & Dobson, 2005). The book exposes a series of admonishing statements to the public on the series of the on-going struggles with outsmarting judiciary. Sutherland writes to spew out his contempt on what he believes is the abuse of power by the Supreme court Judges and points out ways through which this trend can possibly be mitigated. Both the Supreme Court Judges and the Supreme Court nominees alike are deeply engrossed in corruptive deals which the writer seeks to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch. President Adams spent his last hours in officer appointing Federalist judge in all positions.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gorsuch’s stances on many of the more divisive issues facing the United States are practically as unclear as the vocabulary of his predecessor. On immigration, he has offered no definitive ruling. However, being an ardent constitutionalist, he has stated "A government of diffused powers, [omit] is a government less capable of invading the liberties of the people.” This seems to signal trouble for a President who has issued executive orders at an unprecedented rate and of remarkable scope. On abortion, Gorsuch has never given an opinion, but has been known to err on the side of religious freedom.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stenberg V Carhart 2000

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Some of his landmark cases as a Supreme Court justice includes Bush v. Gore (2000), Stenberg v. Carhart (2000) and Glossip v. Gross (2015). Bush v. Gore (2000) was one of Breyer’s most emotional dissent because he made an unusual strong statement in his opinion regarding that the Court should not have been involved with this case (supremecourtreview.com). For a Supreme Court justice to say this is unusual because it is the Courts’ job to determine if illegal acts were committed that affects the Constitution. Breyer compared this case with the election of 1876 because some form of corruption in the election could have been committed (supremecourtreview.com). Most elections in the United States don’t have corruption.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hence, Roosevelt secretly planned to pack the Supreme Court (only his attorney General, Homer Cummings, knew about this idea) with more liberal justices who would approve the New Deal. His proposal was that “for every justice over the age of 70 who refused to retire, the president would have the right to appoint another justice, and so there would be a cap on the number of justices at 15”. If no one retired, then he would appoint six additional liberal justices to the Supreme Court. Unquestionably, he tried to put a mask to his real intentions (passing the New Deal), and aimed to sell the idea that this change would promote judicial efficiency. For instance, he claimed that the justices’ age was central as they were unaware of the necessities of the new times; and in addition, their age was affecting their work productivity, thus needed some help to fulfill their jobs on time.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Robert Bork was nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court on July 1, 1987 by President Ronald RJudge Robert Bork was nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court on July 1, 1987 by President Ronald Reagan. He was a Senior Judicial Advisor to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and solicitor general under President Richard M. Nixon. He fired Special Prosecutor, Archibald Cox, in what became known as the “Saturday Night Massacre”. He opposed the Supreme Court’s one man, one vote decision on legislative apportionment. He wrote an article opposing the 1964 Civil Rights law, requiring hotels, restaurants and other businesses to serve people of all races (Totenberg).…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Amendment did you choose for your topic? Include the number and the text. The 2nd Amendment, The Right to Bear Arms MLA citation for the Bill of Rights (official government site): "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After watching the movie Muhammad Ali’s Greatest Fight, many of the events/situation that occurred between the Supreme Court Justices and law clerks surprised me. First, I was fascinated by Justice Harlan’s law clerk, Kevin Connolly’s tenacity and idealistic attitude during the process of rejecting and accepting the case, Clay v. the United States. For instance, Connolly’s bravery was demonstrated when he tried to dismiss his responsibility to write the brief directed by Justice Harlan due to his political ideology.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The confirmation battles over recently nominated justices certainly suggest that many people view the justices’ personal politics as an important factor in judicial decision-making. But we should not so quickly conclude that Supreme Court justices, like politicians, merely try to institute their own policy preferences. A number of factors complicate the analysis. First, it is difficult to disentangle a justice’s political preferences from his or her…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Impartial Judges

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Judges should not be part of the political system, for then they are beholden to someone and may not be impartial as they should. The fault of any alliance to a political thinking is evidenced in the Supreme Court appointments as presidents appoint judges with whom they will have an alliance of ideology. History has recorded cases in which certain judges of the Supreme Court have, in their single presence or in their single absence, made the difference in a ruling. Judges should not be part of the political system, for then they are beholden to someone and may not be impartial as they should. The fault of any alliance to a political thinking is evidenced in the Supreme Court appointments as presidents appoint judges with whom they will have…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays