Hobby Lobby Ethics Case Study

Improved Essays
In my opinion when it comes to if Hobby Lobby not offering their employees contraceptives or Wheaton College choice to end all student health care was, ethical. My reasons behind why I feel this way is because for one, it goes against everything that Hobby Lobby CEO stand for. As for Wheaton College stopping offering health care to their students, I believe that it should be the responsibility of the student to have some type of health care and it should be the institution responsibility to provide that insurance. However, there should be a liability insurance in place just in case a student gets injured while on campus, but other than that the student should have some type of insurance. Hobby Lobby is a Christian based crafts store. It’s …show more content…
I do not need to have my collage pay for my health insurance nor should have be pay my collage for health insurance, I should be paying them for an education. So with that say I believe that Wheaton College was an ethical move to make. I don’t agree with in the manner that they did it just weeks before the students coverage ends. However, it should not be the responsibility of a school to provided insurance to students even under the Affordable Care Act. The government should have looked into this aspect more thoroughly to insure they were not missing anything. Because by adding this, it was putting a hardship on the school and just like the Hobby Lobby case it was going against their religious beliefs.
In conclusion, being ethical is doing what is morally right in your eyes. Choosing not to give birth control to you employees because it doesn’t follow your religion beliefs or choosing not to provide insurances to your students because the government is requesting you to start using ACA and you have to cut funds from elsewhere are ethical choices that those individuals have made. No businesses or collages should have to be told by the government how you run their establishments. To me that is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although Mill rejects paternalism, he does say that the “only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm [or a definite risk of harm] to others” whether it be physical violence or mental (Mill, p. 10). Therefore, a school such as SVSU with a enhanced focus and outreach towards diversity as well as students of numerous races on campus, must deny Spencer’s speech in order to prevent harm. Especially, when Spencer’s speeches come with a “definite risk of harm” as seen in multiple occasions. Mill himself believes that the only time to allow such paternalism would be to prevent harm and Spencer’s movement has already proven harmful to different racial…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Samantha Harris, a member of FIRE, explains that these restrictions are offensive to the “free society”, and that an everyday citizen does not need approval to speak their mind. The school also required that if subjects are eloquently controversial, students must pay in advance for any damage caused to property (Harris). Although the school may see this as a safety concern, these restrictions are mistaken for prior restraint in the public eye. Students should not have to ask nor pay to speak, when no danger has been caused beforehand. After losing the case, The University of Cincinnati dropped the regulations (Harris).…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the journal article Ethics and Childhood Vaccination Policy in the United States, the authors are trying to make the point that more people should focus on childhood immunization. They focus on it from an ethical point of view, as many parents are refusing to vaccinate their children for various reasons. The article is trying to convey the message that vaccinating your child is not only beneficial for the child itself but also for the good of the community and society. The ethical issue that illustrated here is if healthcare workers are willing to sacrifice the patient’s autonomy for the greater good of everyone else. Another issue that this article points out is that it is not easy to put forth a policy that requires all parents to vaccinate…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Green family has stake in the outcome because it is basically them that have to pay out the tax penalty for not providing the contraceptives to their employees and going against their religion. The employees also have a stake in this ruling because it is them that are trying to force their employer to provide the contraceptive as a part of their health care plan with the company. You could also say that this is a landmark case because they are setting the precedent for employees and companies to come. Whatever happens in this case could have ramification to other Christian-based companies that are trying to impose their religious ideologies on their for-profit…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As mentioned before, Jack claimed Hector should not get the promotion because the company is “conservative.” As a second initiative, changing the company culture to more socially liberal and accepting would prevent anyone from using this argument as a reason to deny minorities opportunities. It would also help prepare the company for the increasingly “diversity positive” world and future and open them up to new clients sharing the same commitment to diversity. In order to change the company culture, Watson should slowly implement diversity training programs while refusing to be lenient on those who reject diversity. Furthermore, top Watson executives must both articulate and practice the new inclusive strategies for the program to be successful. The third and most controversial initiative is to fire Jack since he was the source of the problem.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief Justice Warren Burger argued that we do not provide food stamps, Medicare insurance, or other government benefits to illegal immigrants. Therefore, why should we provide educational benefits? He also believes that education is not a fundamental right or a benefit that everyone deserves. He argues that while this decision may not be pleasing to everyone, it is constitutional. Another valid argument from those who oppose the education of undocumented immigrants is that is places a financial burden on the public school system.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, a physician’s duty to promote health isn’t their only duty because it would be ethically wrong for a physician to release a person from their care because there is no treatment for their illness. Someone with a terminal disease cannot be made healthy so the physicians main role would be to reduce suffering. However, the physician can only reduce suffering by ways that the person has consented. Opponents to PAS agree that physicians should reduce suffering of competent patients but state that reducing suffering should never be done with PAS because they believe a…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In medical, you cannot force a jehovah's witness to get a blood transfusion because it would save their life due to their religion and how they are morally against it. A utilitarian would give them the blood transfusion anyways because if they did not have to die then we would not let them. After the fact they would most definitely sue the hospital because we did not respect their rights and…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They do not personally choose to not help the patient. It is something they must obey because a person is entitled to their rights. A good example of passive euthanasia is “DNR’s “an order to do not resuscitate , if disobeyed by the doctor the patient and family can then sue and cause future havoc for both parties. While I think a higher power has nothing written in stone about this being a sin it’s all depending upon how you look at the situation. It can be argued to be right or…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Creatine Supplements Be Regulated? I believe that creatine should be regulated, to a certain degree. Creatine should not be for sale for those who are under the age of 18, schools should have the right to either regulate or prohibit the use by their athletes, and any other athletic events and teams should have the same right. If people really want to compete and win in sporting events, they shouldn’t need any sort of steroid to help them, they need to work hard to reach their goal, just like how most people achieve what they want in other areas. Not only is it unfair but it’s also dangerous.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays