Case Analysis Of Burwell V. Hobby Lobby

Improved Essays
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms. “They do not have to violate their faith or pay severe fines (The Decision 1).” In both sides many people come together to participate including people with and opinion on abortion, strong religious beliefs, workers’ rights and ect. …show more content…
This is a form of participation because like voting, writing a senator or representative, or boycotts it’s getting involved to evoke change. Many people getting involved. This was brought to attention mainly by unhappy female employees who were not being offered contraceptives. Hobby lobby felt that denying the contrastive was morally correct due to religious ideas of the founders. This shows participation in the government like the others because it is a group of people wanting change and going through the system to attempt getting it. The main two groups involved in this case are the women who believe contraceptives should be given under the affordable care act. The other side consisted of people with strong religious belief that believe ones the egg is fertilized it is alive. The religious group felt protected under the religious freedom restoration act. This act gives them a right to express their religious belief. Both groups that were involved were expected to be involved. This case does not fall into larger participation at the time other than the idea that it is possible for organizations to have religious ideas that can be …show more content…
The main one being view is the freedom of religion. Hobby Lobbies founders believe that it is their rights to deny workers insurance to get contraceptives for they believe it goes against their religious morals and if they went against them they would be denying the first amendment. The Burwell’s side pertains more towards the workers and what they should be provided by the company and whether birth control should be provided. Both are arguments in which it is testing what should a person should be given. One is relating to religion and the other is questioning if this is not right to deny (mainly) women this right to control their own body. The main conflict is the women want birth control and Hobby Lobby doesn’t want to give it to them because it is against their religious morals. This case advances civil liberties for it defines more about amendment. It shows the religion in relation to the workplace is still important even through the government believes firmly in separating the two. The issues if for both sides tough on rights therefore the court had to pick which is the most important in this situation. This case fits in to the history of cases for it touches on when and where you should separate religion for the organizations to not hurt the majority of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that the employer of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. was not required to provide employees with contraception. Because the employers, the Greens family, built their company on Christian values and firmly followed the ideas outlined in the Bible, they were against any form of contraception. They believed that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requiring them to provide contraception was a violation of their right to practice whatever religion as well as a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby Stores). The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, also known as the RFRA, states that the government can not place a huge burden…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court the ruling was overturned. Justice Blackmun who had medical background wrote the Court opinion. Blackmun wrote that the Constitution imagines the “right of privacy” that was “broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” His opinion was the complete opposite…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby’s case argued that their right to religious freedom and beliefs were being violated. They also argued that obligating them to provide contraceptives to their employees violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The RFRA was enacted in 1993 and requires that the government not hinder an individual’s freedom to exercise their religion unless “doing so is the least restrictive way to advance a compelling government interest” (The Economist 1-2). Hobby Lobby argued that obligating corporations to provide their employees with contraception was not the least restrictive way (NWLC…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Comstock Act of 1873 were anti-abortion and anti-contraception laws that continued into the next century. By 1973 these laws seemed out of date, so the court decided to review them after a woman fled to Sweden where abortion is legal because she could not access a legal abortion in America (RP 658). The case of Roe v. Wade helped to change abortion policy and overall protect women’s health. The verdict that came from this trial was that due to her constitutional rights, a woman could have an abortion at any time, but they added stipulations to that. They contradicted themselves by giving rights to the states due to their interest in protecting maternal health and the developing life.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Casey, the Supreme Court’s decision was that the woman’s decision to have an abortion was not a liberty that was protected by the constitution as the appellant claimed. The reasons given for it not being a liberty were the facts that the constitution does not mention it and the traditions of the Americans who for a long time had permitted the practice to be legally proscribed. The Supreme Court was held by the decision it had made previously in the case of Roe vs. Wade since altering the decision, in this case, would prove an error in the eyes of the public as far as the court was concerned. The overall opinion of the court was that the issue was unconstitutional and enforced the decision fully (PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PA. v. CASEY, 1992)…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Warren Court Influence

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Though this case could seem small to many, it lead to one of the leading most controversies within the United States of America, the right for a woman to have an abortion. The case of Griswold v. Connecticut declared the right to privacy which led to the Court to lay “the groundwork for the post-Warren Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which gave women the right to have an abortion”. Through the Warren Court decision a controversy was indirectly led to, which continues to impact many Americans each…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There have been several times within American politics where the rights of groups of people have been fought over. These types of fights have been spread over the course of America’s history the most well known being the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s. One of the most recent of these fights was the repeal of California’s Proposition 8, originally titled the “California Marriage Protection Act,” which only affected same-sex couples. Proposition 8 was a proposal for an amendment addition to the California constitution stating “only marriage between a man and a women is valid or recognized in California,” creating controversy between groups. The California Supreme Court saw that “limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples,” was violating…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Roe V. Wade?

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages

    These cases had to do with the right to privacy for counseling on and access for contraception for both married couples and…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe Vs Wade Research Paper

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Roe v. Wade was the Supreme Court case that led to the legalization of abortion in the United States. By the time Roe v. Wade was introduced, abortion had seemed to be a settled social issue in America. However, by the 1960’s, political factions and campaigns were rising up and stirring the waters of reproductive rights. Abortion had changed during the courses of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, becoming a private practice of the people to a great political divide. Abortion was actually easily accessible during the Twentieth Century, but the ride of religious fundamentalism compelled citizens to become involved in either the protection of the fetus or the defense of reproductive rights.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vaccine War Essay

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    He believes rather than decreasing the number of religious exemptors, this may actually lead to more religious exemptors. Mixing the current political atmosphere, along with the experience of a few states already , hints that governments may respond to invalidation of religious laws that require loyalty to an organized religion by drafting more general and wide…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roe V. Wade Case

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court’s decision for Jane Roe in the the Roe v. Wade case also made a huge impact on the United States. The Roe v. Wade case is still being argued about today, forty three years after the fact. This is because the Roe v. Wade case is about more than simply abortion rights. In the book Landmark Supreme court cases, it states, “The aftermath of Roe thus has been characterized not only by unfolding terms and conditions of the right of privacy, but by an intensified debate over the court’s function” (Lively 327). The decision was made because of the right of privacy, but it is hard to tell what matters fall under the category of private.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case was in court for approximately 2 years, and finally a decision was made. The court was in favor of Jane Roe, with a 7-2 vote. The justices voted that taking away a woman’s right to have an abortion was a violation of the ninth and 14th amendments. But the practice of abortion was restricted during the third trimester of a pregnancy. As soon as this ruling was determined, an opposition was emerged.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays