Case Analysis Of Burwell V. Hobby Lobby

Improved Essays
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms. “They do not have to violate their faith or pay severe fines (The Decision 1).” In both sides many people come together to participate including people with and opinion on abortion, strong religious beliefs, workers’ rights and ect. …show more content…
This is a form of participation because like voting, writing a senator or representative, or boycotts it’s getting involved to evoke change. Many people getting involved. This was brought to attention mainly by unhappy female employees who were not being offered contraceptives. Hobby lobby felt that denying the contrastive was morally correct due to religious ideas of the founders. This shows participation in the government like the others because it is a group of people wanting change and going through the system to attempt getting it. The main two groups involved in this case are the women who believe contraceptives should be given under the affordable care act. The other side consisted of people with strong religious belief that believe ones the egg is fertilized it is alive. The religious group felt protected under the religious freedom restoration act. This act gives them a right to express their religious belief. Both groups that were involved were expected to be involved. This case does not fall into larger participation at the time other than the idea that it is possible for organizations to have religious ideas that can be …show more content…
The main one being view is the freedom of religion. Hobby Lobbies founders believe that it is their rights to deny workers insurance to get contraceptives for they believe it goes against their religious morals and if they went against them they would be denying the first amendment. The Burwell’s side pertains more towards the workers and what they should be provided by the company and whether birth control should be provided. Both are arguments in which it is testing what should a person should be given. One is relating to religion and the other is questioning if this is not right to deny (mainly) women this right to control their own body. The main conflict is the women want birth control and Hobby Lobby doesn’t want to give it to them because it is against their religious morals. This case advances civil liberties for it defines more about amendment. It shows the religion in relation to the workplace is still important even through the government believes firmly in separating the two. The issues if for both sides tough on rights therefore the court had to pick which is the most important in this situation. This case fits in to the history of cases for it touches on when and where you should separate religion for the organizations to not hurt the majority of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Contraceptive Mandate

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    If women want to have rights, to an abortion or birth control, then it should be their choice. Although, being pro-choice does not grant the right to decide other people private matters. The women entitled to rights, and should base their decisions according to their beliefs and morals. The Americans needed a law that would attempt to assist those in need of health care. Therefore, I like the idea of the Affordable Care Act, but mandating to force the law upon individuals is not right and punishing those that refuse to purchase insurance is outrageous.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of their religious beliefs, Hobby Lobby has caused a large issue that had to be brought to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby did not have to pay for contraception coverage. Their insurance still had to cover everything required by the Affordable Care Act, with exception to reproductive health and contraception. The portion of the premium that should have gone to contraception coverage would be subsidized. This does not mean that employees cannot get contraception methods; they would just have to pay for it themselves.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Abortion Issues

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some of these people are called the “pro-life supporters,” their basic function is to support the life of the unborn child instead of the woman’s right to choose. The pro-life answer is to have the child no matter what the consequences. They do not believe abortion is the answer under any circumstances. They say it is murder of a life that does not have a voice to protect itself. The pro-life supporter’s main reason for not supporting abortion is because they consider it is a sin against creation or God.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unequal's Rights

    • 1533 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They can change their religion, and they can be open about which religious beliefs they hold. Individuals are allowed to teach and practice their religious beliefs as well as well as freely worship in the way of their religion. A person is not required to have a group to change religions, but it can be done individually (Barcalow Rights 152). People have a right to their own thought process which includes deciding on the religion they see as being true. Freedom of religion is related to other essential freedoms because people deserve the right to decide for themselves what they believe.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The court had said that the women had been persecuted because of someone else 's prejudice. The local governments and police forces recognize that there is something wrong with the way religion is handled in the country and the ideas and beliefs that are currently being upheld by Kyrgyzstan 's central government and religious leaders has continued to go against the needs of the people and what the local governments want for the people. The Kyrgyzstan government needs to amend the laws that it follows to allow for everyone to openly follow their own religion…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What I would like to discuss in this paper are the philosophical arguments regarding abortion. These arguments are deontological. I am going to talk about the reasons why certain pro-life parties believe Abortion is immoral and wrong. I am also going to talk about why the pro-choice parties believe abortion should not be mandated by the government, but should be a choice made by the woman. The pro-life parties believe that abortion should be illegal, generally for these reasons; the moral right to life of a person begins at conception, induced abortions are an unjust killing which violate the fetus’s right to life, and that the law should not allow such unjust violations to life.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality And Religion

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Which religion has the right view of morality? Different religions do not always agree on points of morality. If religion is really necessary for moral guidance, there is now a problem trying to figure out which religion is the right religion. This is also known as the problem of moral guidance (Arthur,22). Since there are so many possible sources of knowledge, religion cannot be the only reason why people know what is…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this law was not made, and people did not have the freedom of religion, then a lot of people would be in trouble because everyone believes in their own religion, and some trust their religion more than the laws. Everyone believes in different things that is why having freedom of religion is so important. If everyone had the same religion, everyone would have the same thoughts, words, and knowledge. This is one of the many great rights that amendment one gives…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, Justice Alito continues to say that in order for the mandate to be maintained, “it must also constitute the least restrictive means of serving that interest”. This means that the government’s actions must not impose a consequential burden on people it affects. The requirements set forth by the Health and Human Services were a violation of the free exercise of the company owners’ religion. The owners believed that conforming to the HHS’s requirements would promote abortions and other contraceptives, which is against their religious views. If the owners did not comply with the requirement, then they would be forced to pay a very substantial price that would then put a financial burden on the company and its owner.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays