Case Study: Burwell Vs. Hobby Lobby Stores

Improved Essays
In Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that the employer of Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. was not required to provide employees with contraception. Because the employers, the Greens family, built their company on Christian values and firmly followed the ideas outlined in the Bible, they were against any form of contraception. They believed that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requiring them to provide contraception was a violation of their right to practice whatever religion as well as a violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby Stores). The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, also known as the RFRA, states that the government can not place a huge burden

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby’s case argued that their right to religious freedom and beliefs were being violated. They also argued that obligating them to provide contraceptives to their employees violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The RFRA was enacted in 1993 and requires that the government not hinder an individual’s freedom to exercise their religion unless “doing so is the least restrictive way to advance a compelling government interest” (The Economist 1-2). Hobby Lobby argued that obligating corporations to provide their employees with contraception was not the least restrictive way (NWLC…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neil Noesen Case Summary

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 2002 Neil Noesen case, a woman in Wisconsin went to fill her prescription at a local K-Mart, only to be refused by the only pharmacist on duty at the time, Neil Noesen, because the aforementioned pharmacist was a strict Roman Catholic, and it would be against his principles to give someone contraceptives. In addition to this, he believed it would also be wrong to transfer the prescription so that it could be filled by someone else. The district manager knew Noesen would not dispense contraceptives, but was not aware that he wouldn’t at least transfer the prescription. In this situation, the issue revolves around the woman’s right to have access to birth control, and Noesen’s right to exercise his religious freedom.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the Dictionary Act, “the word ‘person’ include[s] corporations, companies, associations, societies, as well as individuals.” (Burwell v. Hobby Lobby) Hobby Lobby believed that they should be exempt from providing their female employees with certain types of contraception that will operate after the fertilization of the egg which is an early stage of abortion. The four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients. The corporation is not looking to prevent coverage of all birth control pills but certain ones that are effective after the egg has been fertilized, which is seen as a human with a right to live in the Christianity community.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people believe that contraceptives should be required in employment based health care. In the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby supreme court case, this is highlighted. This case is an important part of what’s going on in the U.S. today. This case gives people more freedom of religion, but takes away contraceptives that some people that need a job may not be able to afford. The most important points in this case are the background info, court process, and the Supreme Court Decision.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The court ruled that all of these requirements have been met in Bowers; therefore they overturned Lawrence v. Texas. The court now claims that Planned Parenthood…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe V. Wade Problem

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The court based its decision on the first, fourth, ninth, and fourteenth amendments (“Roe v. Wade” para. 2). The first amendment prohibits the federal government from limiting freedom of religion, speech, press, and freedom of assembly. The…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout the years, the government has continually placed bans and limitations on birth control and abortions with Planned Parenthood taking these issues to court to combat the limitations. When the monumental court case, Roe versus Wade (1973), which legalized abortion, Planned Parenthood started providing abortion services along with birth control services and STI testing and treatment (Roe 1 & Planned 1). Morally, many people felt abortion was wrong and were against the Roe versus Wade ruling. The protesting individuals caused a national uproar which sprung many lawmakers into action as they listened to their constituents. Four years after Roe v. Wade was implemented, the Supreme Court upheld a Connecticut law that prohibited Medicaid funding of abortions unless a physician certified the abortion as "medically necessary.”…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the people who have a problem with this medical service, have an issue because it goes against their religious beliefs; but laws, or bills, should ever be swayed by personal beliefs of an individual. One of the most important ideas that structures our national government is the separation of church and state; one of the rights given to all American citizens is freedom of religion, which many people in our country misinterpret. While the people who approve of the bill to defund Planned Parenthood argue that the organization goes against their personal beliefs, they never seem to think about those whose rights they are diminishing. When the Republican Party makes these “proclamations [they] ignore individual rights, freedom of religion, and the fact that faith as a guiding principle can be dangerous when the foundational teachings of social justice are ignored” (Messina-Dysert). These people are ranking their own religious beliefs and morals above providing health care for people in need, especially those who in poverty; as Gina Messina-Dysert stated, “[Supreme] Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said it best: ‘Reproductive freedom is in a sorry situation in the United States.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To cope with the problem of heavy dependence on few suppliers, Best Buy should seek for more alternatives, such as store-brand suppliers instead of relying on some particulars brand-name suppliers. The more the substitutes are, the larger the possibility the company can bargain for a greater price. Meanwhile, the company has to supervise the quality of imported products from suppliers so as to eliminate the problem of product recalls that may hurt the reputation of the company. Despite of the information costs, the company will still benefit in the long term. In addition, Best Buy should provide more training programs prior to work for its employees, especially salespersons to ensure they understand the basic knowledge and functions of different electronic appliances.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, even though this has allowed same-sex marriage to be legalized, “it can also be refused by a religious organization to perform the ceremony or go against their religious doctrine” (Northrup). This decision doesn’t infringe on anyone’s rights or attacks them for being Christian, instead it protects both parties through their own religious freedoms. Moreover, the case doesn’t hurt anyone and helps move America into a more positive future for…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case actually broadened the state 's authority to regulate abortions. Placing a ban on abortion was classified as violating a woman’s…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the court ruled that Phillips had to bake a cake for Charlie and David, he did have his First Amendment rights violated. In the future, the court should consider a different ruling, such as a fine and allow people to run their business in a way that doesn’t violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, rather than forcing him to provide the service. My decision would support the reasoning that people can have their own beliefs under the First Amendment, as long as they do not violate the rights of another. My decision would not force Jack Phillips to make wedding cakes for same-sex couples unless he is making them for heterosexual couples; he has the decision to make wedding cakes for everyone, or for no one. This ruling supports that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act are…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v, Hobby Lobby is a court case that resulted from an issue which addresses the necessity of closely held corporations supplying birth control to its employees. The argument of this case is regarding the mandatory requirement to supply coverage for birth control. Hobby Lobby feels the mandate will also cover birth control options that also includes the abortion pill. Hobby Lobby opposed to this idea and due to their religious beliefs. they believe that they should not be required to supply such coverage for birth control under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Free Exercise Clause.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Wal-Mart Case

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages

    3.0 QUESTION 1 What financial impact do you think the lawsuit could potentially have on Wal-Mart? Do you think the women deserve to win their lawsuit? What is the outcome of the case cost Wal-Mart so much it had to lay off thousands of its workers and close stores? Answer:…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays