CRS Case Study: Effective or Ineffective The use of health care management systems (HMIS) have exploded over the years, which new systems have been created to work with each other. The purpose of these systems has been generated to increase productivity as well as improve on patient care. There are specific components and to each system, which all have their own purpose and goal for improved production. The purpose for research and case studies are to show which systems are more effective than others as well as what improvements can be made for future use.
The major components of Clinical Decision-Support System (CDSS) were generated to manage daily workflow in a more effective manner in regards to clinician’s cognitive thing. This would also help aid in …show more content…
The investigation broke down user’s usage into three categories or light, moderate, and heavy users. This demonstrated that after the ten month study the light users were only utilizing the CRS in approximately 35% of their encounters with their patients. The moderate users showed to have used the system in 70% of encounters, but slowly decreased over time. The heavy users demonstrated a continuous use of about 50% in all patient encounters.
Conclusion
Having the ability to ensure full adoption of the CDSS and accept full capability of the CRS, there would have to have complete devotion to training. Learning a new system typically is a frustrating and difficult task for many. Busy clinicians and clinical staff do not want to delay patient care and change work flow when it makes them feel debilitated by a new system. Incorporating a new system and maintain a productive workflow within a facility, incentives need to be encouraged as well as full knowledge of the system and how it has the ability to improve clinic production and
The major components of Clinical Decision-Support System (CDSS) were generated to manage daily workflow in a more effective manner in regards to clinician’s cognitive thing. This would also help aid in …show more content…
The investigation broke down user’s usage into three categories or light, moderate, and heavy users. This demonstrated that after the ten month study the light users were only utilizing the CRS in approximately 35% of their encounters with their patients. The moderate users showed to have used the system in 70% of encounters, but slowly decreased over time. The heavy users demonstrated a continuous use of about 50% in all patient encounters.
Conclusion
Having the ability to ensure full adoption of the CDSS and accept full capability of the CRS, there would have to have complete devotion to training. Learning a new system typically is a frustrating and difficult task for many. Busy clinicians and clinical staff do not want to delay patient care and change work flow when it makes them feel debilitated by a new system. Incorporating a new system and maintain a productive workflow within a facility, incentives need to be encouraged as well as full knowledge of the system and how it has the ability to improve clinic production and