Argumentative Essay: Protecting Gun Free Zones

Improved Essays
New laws on gun control are being created to ‘help protect citizens’; however, the laws do not always work at their expected caliber. In Chicago, IL crime rates have spiked since the addition of new gun control laws. Not all citizens are going to follow laws only because it is illegal, the only effect the laws are having is removing firearms from law-abiding citizens hands and removing their ability to protect themselves (ProCon.org). Also, gun control laws violate an individual's right the own a gun. Controlling guns with these laws is ineffective and therefore, should not be an action the government is taking. Creating gun free zones does not keep gun related crimes from happening. For example, Chicago has some of the most strict gun control …show more content…
The constitution states , “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Lund). Any law that violates the constitution is unlawful and should be rid of as soon as possible. The reason violating a law in the constitution is it could lead to other law violations of the constitution.
Supporters of gun control laws may think that creating gun free zones will keep gun related crimes from occurring. This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org).
Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society. Making gun free zones does not help keep citizens safe, it only takes guns out of citizens hands who would use them for self defense. The United States people need to realize that these laws are only hurting the nation, and stand up for the rights stated in the constitution. Only then will the people of the United States be paid their

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police would not have access to guns because they are the one who upholds the law and the law would stat that policemen are not to be armed. If criminals have access to illegal guns and will acquire them, then the police who are lawfully unarmed will have no protection. This will cause an uneven shift in crime and punishment, throwing off the…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves. The way to stop gun violence is to protect and elevate gun rights and educate…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument Against Gun Ban

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What a gun ban really is, is something limits the self defense of our nation's citizens and keeps them unprotected against those who wish them harm. It is improbable that a ban will prevent criminals from getting guns, they will however, keep a law abiding citizen from legally purchasing a self defense weapon. Banning guns gives citizens less of a chance to protect themselves. A gun is the most effective form of self defense, when someone is srtipped of their right to have that is leaves them vulnerable, this is another serious problem with gun control because it gives…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Though gun control is a necessary thing, many are against stricter gun control laws. Those opposed to stricter gun control laws would state that gun control would have no effect on reducing crime (Gottieb 1991). However, according to the Huffington Post, which states that with “Higher gun violence tend to have much less stringent gun laws” (States 2013). Having gun laws that put severe restrictions on guns are unhelpful and impractical. The government can make it almost impossible to obtain a…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guns are not the problem, people are. Gun laws will only prevent law abiding citizens from getting guns to protect themselves from both legally and illegally armed criminals. People often misunderstand the purpose of the Second Amendment. Many anti gun argue that the Second Amendment is out dated…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminals are labeled as criminals because they do not obey laws, so making laws to limit the ownership and usage of guns would not help prevent gun-related crimes. The laws would only limit the rights of law-abiding citizens. Perfectly stated by Jeffery Miron, “Thus the classic slogan - when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns - isn’t only a word play, it is a fundamental insight into the folly of gun prohibition. Such an approach means that the bad guys are well-armed while the law-abiding citizens are not” (“Rebutting”). Miron mentioned the foolishness of gun prohibition, which one could relate to the failure of alcohol prohibition.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon. It will be scratched off so the weapon cannot be tracked. “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun bans remove weapons from citizens, placing them at risk for victimization. Stricter gun control laws will favor the criminal as there is an increased chance that the citizens will be unable to defend themselves making them vulnerable to attacks. Criminals will become increasingly brazen, no longer committing crimes in the dead of the night. Citizens will have to sit idly by, no longer able to thwart crimes in progress. Contrary to opponents for gun control, pro-gun control supporters do not believe the Second Amendment is an unlimited right to carry guns and therefore, does not infringed upon their rights (ProCon.org).…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays