Argumentative Essay: Protecting Gun Free Zones

Improved Essays
New laws on gun control are being created to ‘help protect citizens’; however, the laws do not always work at their expected caliber. In Chicago, IL crime rates have spiked since the addition of new gun control laws. Not all citizens are going to follow laws only because it is illegal, the only effect the laws are having is removing firearms from law-abiding citizens hands and removing their ability to protect themselves (ProCon.org). Also, gun control laws violate an individual's right the own a gun. Controlling guns with these laws is ineffective and therefore, should not be an action the government is taking. Creating gun free zones does not keep gun related crimes from happening. For example, Chicago has some of the most strict gun control …show more content…
The constitution states , “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Lund). Any law that violates the constitution is unlawful and should be rid of as soon as possible. The reason violating a law in the constitution is it could lead to other law violations of the constitution.
Supporters of gun control laws may think that creating gun free zones will keep gun related crimes from occurring. This belief, however, is disproved by evidence. If guns are made illegal to own, law-abiding citizens will then turn in their guns. However, those who wish to do harm with their guns would keep their guns illegally. Therefore, these laws not only take guns away from responsible citizens, but give those who wish to keep their guns an unfair advantage if they were to attack another person (ProCon.org).
Gun control laws are ineffective and should not be in present in today’s society. Making gun free zones does not help keep citizens safe, it only takes guns out of citizens hands who would use them for self defense. The United States people need to realize that these laws are only hurting the nation, and stand up for the rights stated in the constitution. Only then will the people of the United States be paid their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America’s crime rate is at an all time high. Citizens do not feel safe in their own environments. Placing stricter laws on gun control can help reduce these unfortunate circumstances. The federal law does not…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control has been extremely controversial in society for years. In the essay “Just Take Away Their Guns,” James Q. Wilson argues his view on stricter gun control laws. He writes, “Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns will have little effect on the illegal use of guns” (Wilson, 1994, p.125). He backs up his statement with the statistics that 5/6 of handguns used in crimes are either stolen or purchased privately. With this being said, he displays that increasing legal restraints on purchasing guns will have little to no effect on the use of guns to commit crimes.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence In Englewood

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Chicago Tribune Crime in Chicagoland, the author states, “More than 300,000 people are killed by firearm each year. When gun control occurred, police had taken 4,824 illegally owned guns off the street” (Chicago Tribune Crime In Chicagoland). This quote proves that when gun control hasn’t existed yet, people would become extremely violent and decide to kill whoever they want, so the death rate would be extraordinary high. As gun control permitted into the neighborhood, even though the death rates has been high, but they have been reduced. If more gun laws were produced, then innocent lives wouldn’t be lost.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most ineffective gun laws in place today is the gun free zones act, limiting where one can bring a gun. Gun free zones are an easy target for mass killers. Gun control advocates often fail to see that guns deter criminals. For instance, John R. Lott an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights advocate puts this law it into perspective in his article “Bans don’t deter killers”: “If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, ‘This Home is a Gun-Free Zone’? That is what schools do" (par. 5).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the founding fathers of the United States wrote the Constitution, they added the Bill of Rights which is a set of the first the ten amendments of to the Constitution. The second of these amendments, states that "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." (U.S Const. Amend II). Particularly, this amendment is interpreted in many ways; some pro gun-control groups say only militias are allowed to bear arms, and pro gun groups say that every citizen is allowed to bear arms.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Pros And Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regardless of the form of gun control, it takes away our right to own guns; the Second Amendment of the Constitution. In contradiction to what several politicians say how firearm related events and deaths are at an all time high, it is actually at the lowest it has ever been in over twenty years. According to data provided by CNN, the number of non fatal firearm related incidents has decreased by a whopping seventy five percent while…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The definition of a criminal tells us that criminals are a person who has committed a crime and broken the law in some way, shape, or form. Common sense tells us that criminals do not follow laws, so gun control laws will just add to the list of laws for them to break. One example of a law that was broken is the Gun Control Act of 1968. The Gun Control act of 1968 did not prevent any crime from happening and in “states enacting more-relaxed right-to-carry laws, murders fell an average of 8 percent, rapes an average of 5 percent, and aggravated assaults an average of 7 percent between 1977 and 1992” (Lott 1).…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concealed Carry In Schools

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Currently, the concealed carry law is only a state law instead of a federal law. Some states do not allow firearms being on certain properties such as a government building, a church or a school. In other states, private businesses prohibit conceal carry. The pro view believes that “gun-free zones” are safe. The con view is that these safe zones are not…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Free Zones Analysis

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many gun free zones are ones that have had mass shootings because there was nobody there to stop the gunman. Gun control goes against the Constitution and will…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stricter Gun Control Laws

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A lot of people think that taking away guns will make it impossible for a criminal to get and gun and that it will also lower crime rates involving weapons. “The Proposition you can vicariously control criminal or psychopathic behaviour by confiscating private property and burying law-abiding citizens under a mountain of regulations is absurd” (Falco,…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is in direct opposition to the reports by the media that gun violence is on the rise. Factual evidence actually shows that one is more likely to be killed by hammers than by shooting. The elimination of all gun-free zones would allow these law abiding citizens to carry guns and provide a greater protection for everyone. An individual who legally possess a firearm, which is defined as a rifle, shotgun or hand gun is required by federal law to pass through a licensing process which includes a background check.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    William S. LaPierre from “Crime is the Basic Problem, Not Guns” claims that, “America has a crime problem, not a gun problem.” Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public especially for our children. If a new gun law were to be put in place, one that would state that guns are illegal, crime would most likely not change. People would be left defenseless against criminals.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Changes

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun control has been a hot topic in the United States since the time Roosevelt was in office. Starting with Roosevelt where there were only two federal statutes, and going to the Clinton era and having two decades worth of policy and laws on firearms, firearm laws have changed drastically. But with Congress stepping in and getting help from state legislature, all the goals of having a gun safe world is being destroyed and being limited to three realistic goals such as reducing possession by high-risk people, restricting access from certain people, and using guns to stop top level offenders. Federal level firearm policy hasn’t really changed since the Brady Law and assault weapon restrictions in 1993. But none of these laws have changed the…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays