Gun Free Zones Analysis

Improved Essays
92% of mass shootings since 2009 occurred in gun-free zones (Hawkins, 2014). The basic rights of the Second Amendment allow us to purchase weapons and use them as we please as long as we follow the rules and laws. Gun rights were very serious rights when America was first founded and are still very serious and important. After a few shootings, the federal government decided to mark some areas as gun free zones because they were trying to stop mass shootings. Instead of further protecting the people, the gun free zones actually created more chaos by making the community defenceless. Many gun free zones are ones that have had mass shootings because there was nobody there to stop the gunman. Gun control goes against the Constitution and will …show more content…
Dan Patrick said that only two mass shootings since 1950 occurred outside of gun free zones (Shelly, 2016). The people who commit these mass shootings choose to mass murder in these zones because the murderers feel as though no one will stop them; they are right, because no one will be able to defend themselves. Over and over these shootings happen in gun free zones and still the zones stay the same; unarmed and unsafe. Dan Patrick's quote mentioned above may not be 100% correct but it still shows how gun free cause more harm than it fixes. Alexander Hamilton said, “If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. In a single state, if the persons entrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.” John W. Putnam said, “The people have a right to keep arms; therefore, if we should have some Executive who attempted to set himself up as dictator or king, the people can organize themselves together and, with the arms and ammunition they have, they can properly protect

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One of the most ineffective gun laws in place today is the gun free zones act, limiting where one can bring a gun. Gun free zones are an easy target for mass killers. Gun control advocates often fail to see that guns deter criminals. For instance, John R. Lott an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights advocate puts this law it into perspective in his article “Bans don’t deter killers”: “If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, ‘This Home is a Gun-Free Zone’? That is what schools do" (par. 5).…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Violence In Englewood

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Chicago Tribune Crime in Chicagoland, the author states, “More than 300,000 people are killed by firearm each year. When gun control occurred, police had taken 4,824 illegally owned guns off the street” (Chicago Tribune Crime In Chicagoland). This quote proves that when gun control hasn’t existed yet, people would become extremely violent and decide to kill whoever they want, so the death rate would be extraordinary high. As gun control permitted into the neighborhood, even though the death rates has been high, but they have been reduced. If more gun laws were produced, then innocent lives wouldn’t be lost.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Free Zone Analysis

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A man with red curly hair walks through the door and sits in the front row. No one suspects him of anything. The lights go down; the room goes quite. Approximately twenty minutes into the movie, the man receives a phone call. He stands up and exits through an emergency exit leaving it propped open to return.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Roth, 2014) The idea that anyone can shoot you at any time and claim it as “self-defense” is scary, and whether people admit it or not, this cause of fear only exists because almost anyone can get their hands on a gun. Guns have a specific purpose- to defend and protect the innocent, mainly in the instances of war and self-defense. However, with that weapon comes the necessity to be able to protect the innocent against those who would misuse firearms. Stricter gun control would greatly benefit the city of Philadelphia; in fact this would benefit the entire world.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some opponents of tougher gun control legislation say that criminal activity is very likely to occur when there is no force of protection present between a criminal and a defenseless target. Criminals will prefer to commit their diabolical acts in highly populated “gun free” zones, where citizens are not armed and are subjected to the villain’s will. According to John Lott Jr., former chief economist for the U.S. Sentencing Commission, every mass shooting since 1977, other than the 2011 Tucson killings, has occurred in a gun-free zone. Whether these predators like to pounce upon their easily accessible, unarmed prey, or think that they are more likely to be stopped in areas where people are allowed to carry concealed weapons, they still are taking advantage of the gun control laws (Taylor). Opponents say that the solution to this problem is to allow citizens to carry concealed weapons.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why is the second amendment so important? it seems in today's society we find ourselves asking this question whenever a tragedy like the Orlando shooting occurs. the second amendment is what makes America the most unique and special country in the world. We are the only country in the that has a written document that states that citizens have a basic human right to defend themselves and form an a led body militia. It ensures that Americans can keep the government in check and that the citizens have the right to defend themselves.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control is Not the Solution Increased Gun Control in the United States is absurd, useless, and unnecessary. In order to increase safety all throughout the United States time and effort must not be spent towards limiting gun owners of their rights. The tragic rash of school, religious, and workplace shootings has turned up the heat on the public conversation about guns. In nearly all of these cases gun laws would not have stopped the shooters from obtaining a firearm.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mass shooting and gun ownership rates are highly correlated and “the higher the gun ownership rate, the more a country is susceptible to experiencing mass shooting incidents” (Phillip). The issue may not start with the gun owner. There are several occasions where the person that caused the shooting is not the person that owns the gun but instead someone else who should have known about the gun in the first place. People may have different opinions about the issue that guns does not make a safe environment because of the second amendment. The second amendment gives us the right to bear arms.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The latest mass shootings have happened in where? Gun free zones. The ones like the shooting in Aurora, Colorado, the Oregon junior college and the Ft Hood massacre have all happened in gun free zones. The issue isn't the gun it’s the person behind the gun pulling a trigger.…

    • 189 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Free Zones

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if the teachers at Sandy Hook had guns and fought back? Paris has strict gun control. Even if one person in the Paris crowd had a gun, they could have held off the attackers until the police arrived and possibly reduced the number of casualties. In San Bernardino, the situation was similar. No one had a gun to protect themselves and they were hopeless. All these examples, occurred in gun free zones.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Mental Illness

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gun Control and Mental Illness Because of the lack of stringent gun control laws in the United States, there have been incidents that are more violent and deadly. In today’s society we have been witness more than a plethora of school shootings, deaths by misuse, the selling and trading of firearms to the very mentally ill, and other small incidents that go uncounted for. When the words “gun control” enters the ears and eyes of conservatives and enthusiasts, they argue that it is against their second amendment right to bear arms and it “shall not be infringed.” But when “life” from Thomas Jefferson’s “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” is infringed and taken away, those who acknowledges the lack of laws for gun control and regulations,…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lopez, a 12th grader, brought a .38 caliber gun to school. After being caught and arrested, he was charged under state law. However, the state dropped their charges because federal government wanted to charge him under Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990. Issue: Was the federal government unconstitutional when it made guns illegal in school zones? Was the government exceeding the powers granted to it under the Commerce Clause?…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does someone who shoplifts a candy bar get sentenced to death? Do American people get thrown in prison for practicing their religion? Is it illegal to speak your mind? The answer to these questions is obviously no. These are basic human rights given to us by the constitution and to take these away would be unconstitutional.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Depending on who a person talks to will depend on the opinion one will receive when talking about gun free zones and having guns in schools. To some people, even the sight of a weapon brings fear to their very core, while others look at it as a way to be protected from the bad guys of the world. The right to "keep and bear arms" is enshrined in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and reflects a deeply held American belief in the use of weapons - particularly guns - for sport and for protection (Donnelly, 2015). A large percentage of Americans feel this is a God given right that we have to bear arms. Especially when it comes to protecting our greatest export that we as Americans have, our youth.…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The right to bear arms has been topic of discussion among people since ancient times. Political theorist John Locke viewed possession of arms as a personal freedom one should abstain. The Second Amendments purpose and meaning has been a key controversy. The Amendment adopted in 1791, was constructed so each state maintained a militia, composed of everyday citizens who served as part time soldiers which were well regulated. People feared the federal government would use its standing army to go against its will on the states, the authors of the second amendment intended to protect the states militias’ right to bear arms.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays