Gun Free Zone Research Paper

Decent Essays
One of the most ineffective gun laws in place today is the gun free zones act, limiting where one can bring a gun. Gun free zones are an easy target for mass killers. Gun control advocates often fail to see that guns deter criminals. For instance, John R. Lott an American economist, political commentator, and gun rights advocate puts this law it into perspective in his article “Bans don’t deter killers”: “If a killer were stalking your family, would you feel safer putting a sign out front announcing, ‘This Home is a Gun-Free Zone’? That is what schools do" (par. 5). Mass killers go where the victims cannot defend themselves. Every single school shooting occurs because the killer knows that they will not be stopped. “Columbine High School, where …show more content…
If concealed carry permits were allowed in gun-free zones crime could be diminished throughout The United States. "The law-abiding, not criminals, are obeying the rules. Disarming the victims simply means that the killers have less to fear" (Lott, “Bans don’t deter killers,” par. 4). Concealed carry permit holders are some of the most law-abiding people in America. More than 8.5 million Americans can legally carry concealed handguns: “They are next to us in restaurants, movie theaters and stores. Permit holders are law abiding, committing firearms violations at a rate of hundredths of 1%” (Lott, “Guns in schools can save lives,” par. 6). If one does not feel comfortable with a gun, they should not be required to carry one, but the right to protect yourself should never be taken away. With all the gun violence in the world, it should be encouraged to get a concealed carry, not looked down upon. Andrea Noble, a staff writing for The Washington Times shows law officials perspective on this issue: “The vast majority of officers also believe legally armed citizens are important in the reduction of crime rates” (Nobel, par. 4). Officers realize that there is usually not enough time to arrive at the crime scene before the violence occur. Stossel explains how much of an impact on having a gun can be: “If someone gets into your house, which would you rather have, a handgun or a telephone? You can call the police if you want, and they 'll get there, and they 'll take a picture of your dead body. But they can 't get there in time to save your life. The first line of defense is you” (par. 13). The difference between having a gun and relying on the police could be the difference between life or death. “...a number of surveys regarding the successful use of guns in self-defense, and he [Gary Fleck] estimates that Americans, in any recent year, use guns for self-defense between 800,000

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    They would rather buy a gun off the black market because more than likely the serial number will not be present on the weapon. It will be scratched off so the weapon cannot be tracked. “The result of these studies appear to indicate that gun control laws have no effect on criminals.” (Alters 1) As a result, even though there are gun laws in place, criminals find a way around it. Criminals always have. This is often argued by people since they tend to ignore the fact that criminals will always have weapons.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Banning handguns will not prevent criminals from obtaining guns. What these laws will do however is keep perfectly right minded law abiding citizens from defending themselves. Without Handguns citizens are left much more vulnerable. If a ban on handguns went into place the only people that would break the law to obtain a handgun would be the criminals themselves. A law abiding citizen would not go out of their way to obtain a handgun and break the law, making them the only people without some means self-defense.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay Gun control in America has always been an issue. With problems coming up such as school shootings, teens getting their hands on their parents’ guns, and kids accidentally shooting themselves, people want laws set forward to limit the use of guns. In “End the Gun Epidemic in America,” The Editorial Board talks about how they want stricter gun laws because no one really needs to own a gun. The Editorial Board believes there should be stricter gun laws in the United States because they think it’s too easy to get your hand on a gun and possibly injure someone. Their use of pathos throughout the article makes the audience want there to be stricter gun laws, but the use of logos and ethos is weak.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Activist in favor of gun control believe that with gun control being enacted that the United States would not only be better off but safer as well. The other party who disbelieve in the need for gun control believe that with it the country will only grow more corrupt considering the facts that the states that have had gun constraints have grown more violent prove their point. Gun control would keep guns out of the United States for a short period after it would be enacted, but as soon as they are smuggled into the United States all of the citizens who had previously given up their arms now have no guns to defend themselves against robbers, muggers, or whoever it might be that threatens their lives. In order to keep guns better under control without taking away guns from citizens is by enforcing security in places like schools and for the government to keep track of who is mentally unstable and to make sure that there is no chance what so ever for them to get in reach of a…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yes, the banning of handguns is the wrong decision because banning them prevents people from defending themselves properly. Wayne LaPierre, the executive vice president of the National Rifle Association claims that “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun”(Mantel 2). If bad guys knew that other people had firearms then criminals would be more worried about getting shot while the criminals committed a crime.Therefore, if the criminal was more worried about getting shot instead of committing the crime, the crime ratings would decrease. If a good guy did not have a firearm, then the criminals would run free and not have to worry about citizens returning the fire back at them. Allowing the option to its law-abiding citizens, personal safety should be one of the top priorities in the United States.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Everyone has to understand this. Taking our American rights isn 't the solution. People are the issue here so don 't punish the good, honest gun owners because there are bad people in the world. We need a way to protect our self from our government. About everyone is armed, yet the crime and violence rate is extremely low!…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Is Gun Control Bad

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Its is important to know that guns do need to have some restrictions to a certain extent, but not to the point where it disarms our citizens who obey the law. Gun control cannot stop guns from getting into the hands of criminals, they will manage a way of getting guns to their desire. What seems seems to be the problem is gun control because it only hurts the ones who obey the law. We as Americans need to protect the rights of this nation to be free, gun control affects our citizens and not the…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Not only does it cause law abiding citizens to feel that their safety and rights are being infringed but it does not help prevent violent crimes. As has been mentioned, in some states the more gun-owners there were resulted in less violent crimes to occur. Despite the amount of laws that could be placed to prevent criminals from obtaining weapons there are still black markets and other illegal ways for them to get guns. Unfortunately, gun control would only be affecting those who abide by the law in obtain guns and using them. The United States should not be a place where people fear for their lives and have no way of protecting themselves.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. ( Ronald Cruise). The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many criminals are willing to do whatever it takes to get what they want, and mentally ill individuals have no ethics to guide their decisions. Therefore, The United States should require mandatory, universal background checks, mental health screenings, and exams for all who wish to purchase guns. Guns should not be banned, however. Citizens of the United States do have a Constitutional right to carry and bear arms, which includes handguns. But, it’s important to get guns out of the hands of the people who wish to do harm to others or who are very likely to do harm to others.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays