Analysis Of The Patriot Act

Decent Essays
After the Patriot Act people were worried about their government watching their every move. 9/11 made people terrified of terrorists and willing to harm innocent people because of their race/ religion. But, when they have people who have been proven guilty of terrorism, they are not willing to let the government into their phones to catch more terrorists. The government has a warrant to search the iphone of Syed Farook but Apple won't allow it. Their claim is that they want to protect the privacy of their customers, but do they want to protect the pedophills and terrorists who harm thousands of people? There could be crucial information on these devices that can’t be accessed because Apple won't give access to one iphone.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Patriot Act: Loop Holes

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Patriot Act has many loop holes and is open for interpretation for the government to use to its liking. The act states that anyone can be accused of terrorism by: Guilt by association, association as grounds for exclusion or deportation, the ban on supporting lawful activities of groups labeled terrorist, the use of secret evidence, and the empowerment of the Secretary of State to designate groups as terrorist organizations, without judicial or congressional review. The government has the power to decide who is a terrorist under their own terms and use the Patriot Act in their…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Following the attacks that occurred on 9/11, the United States government established the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was put into place to ensure the safety of the citizens of the United States by enhancing the security of the country. The act revised the nation’s surveillance laws, expanding the government’s authority to look into the records of citizens. This law also reduced the judicial oversight, public accountability and the ability to challenge government searches in court. These alterations and additions to the surveillance of the United States was said to ensure the safety of the people from ever having to experience any terrorist attack like the one that happened on 9/11.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On September 11, 2001 terrorist attacked the United States, which changed the lives of everyone. The United States wanted to ensure this never occurred again, to ensure this the Patriot Act was passed. The USA PATRIOT Act, commonly known as the Patriot Act, is an Act of Congress which President George W. Bush signed into law on October 26, 2001. The Act was passed a merely 45 after the September 11, 2001 attacks. Only one United States senator, Russell Feingold, of Wisconsin voted against the USA Patriot Act (EPIC).…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    October 26,2001, just a little bit over a year after the most infamous terrorist attacks on the US, the USA PATRIOT Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush. The expanded full title is “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Require to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. ” This act quickly caused controversy and sparked many debates about national security and civil liberties because it created legislative changes which significantly increased the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies in the United States without providing a system of checks and balances to safeguard civil liberties. The only Senator to oppose the Act, was Russ Feingold.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “ Justification in Punishment” known as the intolerable acts created an exasperated state of being for the colonists. The Intolerable Acts consisted of five different laws. The first one was the Vice Admiralty Courts, this allowed the ruler of England to pick the location of the trials, and make sure it is judged fairly. Secondly, the Massachusetts Bay Regulating Act banned all town meetings and allowed England to govern the colony. The Boston Port Act was in result of the Boston Tea Party, where 342 chests of tea were dumped into the port.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Patriot Act can sound scary. This idea that this big monitering, force, knows everything about you, and can access all of your information at the click of a button. Thats a power that can be easily abused. But has it been? Has it hurt anyone?…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patriot Act Dbq Essay

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The one reason many Americans oppose the Patriot act is because of its little success. Even with this act in place, "it doesn't make us any safer" (source 2). As far as catching terrorists, it hasn't showed many results. However, there are many other crimes that can be easily detected by having the ability to see all cell phone activity. For example between "2003 and 2005, there was 53 criminal referrals" (source 5).…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After the biggest terrorist attack in US history, a bill was passed which was a result of what happens when a government panicked. After 9/11, the US government was afraid an attack would happen again. So in a panic, the USA PATRIOT Act was passed in the Senate on October 25 2001, just 45 days after the attack with a vote of 98:1. The USA PATRIOT Act stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The purpose behind its name was that it deemed anyone who violated the PATRIOT Act unpatriotic or a traitor to the United States.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the incident on September 11, 2001 we had an act that was passed in haste only 45 days after the attack. We had an act that was passed by George W Bush in a time of fear and unease . Even though we 're trying to protect American liberties from enemies, it is wrong to take away individual rights. One act before the patriot act was Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1968 Also called “Wiretap Statute” which restricted the government 's ability to listen to private conversation, both was controversial because it was signed in 1968 and we did not have the technology we had back then like laptops and cell phones which could be used in very bad ways to hurt or even worse kill people (Patriot)But it also could be a burden for the innocent people who have the government listen on to their private conversations which would take away their constitutional right to privacy. So too little of not listing and to much of listening in on peoples conversations is a bad thing, that 's why we should find a balance between the two so we don 't change the principles we have as a country .…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The USA Patriot Act is short for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (Patriot Act 2011). After September eleventh 's attack, The U.S. House of Representatives passed the bill to President George W. Bush, which he signed into law on October 26, 2001 in hopes of preventing another attack on American soil. The act was based on a Department of Justice proposal that was modified by the Congress before it was enacted into law (96). The act was made to give more power to federal enforcement officials to investigate and prosecute those responsible for the attacks on the twin towers, and the pentagon (96). This act modifies a variety of statutes like: intelligence, investigation, controlled substance, crime, privacy, and financial transactions.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Apple should not help the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) with the unlocking of Syed Farooks cell phone. The law the Government can not force agreements on companies when it comes to certain decisions that are made. Instead they can ask for permission and it is up to the company; in this case Apple to make the final choice. This has been a hot topic in the news after the terrorist attack in December in San Bernardino, behind the minds of gunman Syed Farook and his wife. Safety and privacy are major contributions to one’s rights.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After 9/11 occurred, the Bush Administration designed a law called the “Patriot Act.” The purpose of the Patriot Act is to surveil cellphones, tablets and anything that has a connection to the internet without you knowing. It is unconstitutional…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the Apple’s privacy argument is all about safeguarding the public safety of all the good people using their products. On the other hand, the Government’s national security argument is that, the true culprits of the San Bernandino case could be brought be caught and brought into light. Explanation:…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Government's fight against terrorism to protect the American People would require it to police and establish dominance over individual technology companies. Most technology companies have been steadily increasing their use of safeguards following recent hacking attacks and revelations from former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, so accessing phones will continue to become even more difficult for the FBI and other agencies. The American people should assist in any way possible to prevent any type of terrorist activity and Apple has offered their cooperation to the best of their ability, but the government should not force them to create a feature that could potentially cause more harm than good. Criminals will soon be able to use that software to hack into airplanes, telephones, health records, and financial records. Who are the people that get to decide who the good and bad people are?…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pandora’s Box of Cyberspace In December of 2015, a man in San Bernardino walked into his place of work, the Department of Health during a holiday party and opened fire, left, and then returned again killing a total of 14 people and injuring 21 people. It was highly speculated that this man was a terrorist linked to a radical organization and was possibly planning multiple attacks following the shooting in December. Law enforcement officers believed the information about these future attacks and his correspondence with the radical organization was stored in his iPhone 5c. The FBI wanted Apple to make it easier for them to guess the 4 or 6-digit password without having to worry about the phone wiping away the information. The FBI issued…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays