Apple Unlocking Farooq Case Study

Improved Essays
2. After conducting a detailed exploration about the facts related to the case, the following are the details that gathered in a step by step manner:

shooting left a 12-year-old dead and a 14-year-old injured in San Bernardino.

3. Pros and cons of Apple unlocking Farooq’s iPhone:
Pros:
1. Terrorism has been a threat to mankind, since many years. So, unlocking Farooq’s iPhone might definitely help the FBI team, to solve the Farooq’s case to some extent, in finding the true culprits responsible for the slaughter, at San Bernandino.
2. Unlocking an iPhone, which no one ever thought could be unlocked, could be considered another advancement in science.
3. Creating a master key to unlock Farooq’s iPhone, can not only be used to
…show more content…
Also, the Apple’s privacy argument is all about safeguarding the public safety of all the good people using their products.
On the other hand, the Government’s national security argument is that, the true culprits of the San Bernandino case could be brought be caught and brought into light.
Explanation:
The current Apple case doesn’t involve a backdoor in the traditional sense. The FBI is asking Apple to create a tool that would circumvent a feature that deletes all of the information on the phone after 10 failed password attempts. Apple doesn’t want to break anyone’s encryption or set a master key loose on the land. Also, the authority over the master key that Apple would grant the FBI could be used again across a range of scenarios that weaken Apple’s privacy and security as well.

5. My Opinion about the case
The argument about San Bernandino case is like two faces of a coin, which have equal value. If I support the FBI’s point of view, then it will be like I am creating a privacy and a public safety issue for myself as I myself have an iPhone. If I support the point of view of Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, then it means that the terrorist activities will not get solved, which is threatening sign to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The San Bernardino shooting was a tragic event. A cell phone recovered after the shooting has been collected as evidence. Law enforcement believes that unlocking the phone which is an iPhone would help them learn more about the attack and plans. They also believe that this would allow them to intercept future attacks and protect innocent people. Guessing the code incorrectly ten times is believed to erase the data on the phone (Lichtblau).…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And my evidence is that only about 51% say that is should be unlocked and about 39% people say that they should not unlocked the phone. But the Apple company is like they should not give the software to the FBI but if they lose the case they will have to unlock the phone. But then the Apple company is have trouble with the FBI but the Apple company has some rules so that they will not unlock the phone. I wonder if the Apple company will still make a updated phone so that the FBI will not get in people phone any more. But I hope the FBI will leave the Apple compon alone and just find some hacker to open it.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iphones, Inc. Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The previous judges in the cases have expressed that code can be considered a form of speech. What the FBI wants Apple to do is write a new code, which is considered a form of speech. It violates the First Amendment rights as forcing speech and going against Apples interests. Gross also continues by saying that Apple is also arguing that this should not be forced upon them because the FBI has not proven that useful information will be found on the phone, it has only been speculated. According to Gross, “The Fifth Amendment protects U.S. residents against the government taking away their liberty” (Gross).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security. If those that are serving our country isn’t allowed to fully operate, unnecessary conflict will occur which will not only affect the U.S but become a worldwide problem. Terrorist are viewed as people that have given up their rights, therefore obtaining their information shouldn’t be questioned unless the company supports…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The FBI operates so they can get whatever they need from a company, whether it 's an encryption key or any additional needed information, they fail to keep in mind that these demands will deteriorate a majority of these companies customer’s privacy. In addition, the FBI has seemingly been aware that any backdoor operating system created would not only operate for this particular suspect 's IPhone. Source D, states “ Once created(backdoor operating system), the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices.”this means that once he FBI obtains this new IOS system, they would not have to ask for it again in another situation similar to…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apple should unlock the iPhone no matter their reasoning not to. Families of the people who were killed need answers, as well as the rest of the world. If this is the way to get them then shouldn’t they be doing everything in their power to get the answers? Stephan Larson, a lawyer representing some of the victims, said that his clients had an interest in the contents of the terrorist phone. They were targeted by terrorist Larson said and they need to know how and why this had happen.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Comey, the FBI director, discussed that this problem should not be solved by a company that sells phones or by an agency that protects citizens but rather by the people their trying to protect. It should be up to the American people to choose what means more to them, security or privacy (Willens, 6). On the contrary, Apple believes that creating a back door could potentially cause the FBI to use that backdoor for evil. They would be allowed into anyone’s iPhone whether they were allowed to or not. Also, they could allow spyware onto users phones at any time.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, not disclosed to the public were the 12 other iPhones that the Department of Justice wanted access to from Apple in pending criminal cases by court order. The public is being expected to make an educated decision about what is right when all the facts are not the as widely distributed. The people are being coerced by the FBI to believe that without Apple’s complete compliance Apple does not care about safety and national security. The FBI sought to gain something far more dangerous than possible accomplices and schemes but the absolute power to access anyone’s information. As reported in “The Apple-FBI Fight Isn’t About Privacy vs. Security.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple prides itself as having the strongest security system against brute force attacks on their devices because of their signature software. This reputation of Apple’s has helped the company become the global leader in smart phone device distribution. The government is asking Apple to place firmware on the phones disabling the latest erase data feature so they can brute force the phone. Essentially, the FBI is asking Apple to hack their own customers. [11] If customers find out about this sabotage they will stop updating their phone and either way the customer lose because they become prone to attacks with outdated protection.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine living in a world where the government had complete control and access to your personal secrets. This world might soon come upon us if we don’t take a stand against the F.B.I. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is convinced that they have the right to forcefully intrude on an individual daily life when they choose. In March of 2016 went against the F.B.I beliefs by sticking to its ideals and protecting individuals rights. Apple did this by refusing to help the F.B.I unlock an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays