Acc 565 Assignment 2 Essay

1450 Words Feb 7th, 2015 6 Pages
Ans. 1 As per the rules and regulations in the Internal revenue service the allegation led by the company on the client, in the first case of unreasonable compensation The person's reward must be accepted in proceed by an "certified body." This can be the whole of a committee of the board, board of directors, or persons authorized by the board or other persons to act on its part. Thus, it is not obligatory to have the complete board agree the deal. It can be permitted by a board selected for the idea by the executives committee. They consist of minimum of two board members. However in IRS only one member is required as allowed under state's nonprofit business law. If tolerable by your state's nonprofit corporation act, a sovereign board …show more content…
(Journal of Accountancy, 2014).

According to IRC SEC 301 if the IRS is sharing that amount which is on fair market value of assets received therefore, in this scenario the stock is lying 50% by the client and his son the value is determine as the fair market value as per the section 301 of the IRC of the IRS, as the stock is treated as dividend under the rules there the FMV is determined the gross income. (Investorwords, 2014).

Ans3. The amount of 301 Section of IRS of the IRC of the distribution in excess of the e and p allocated thereto is treated as a capital return for shareholders to the limit of its foundation in the shares and the stock whose root is abridged by that sum. (IRS, 2014).
Section 301 states that excess distribution over the shareholder’s stocks is capital gain and can be treated to the same by stock sailing. Sec 301(c) (3) (A). The tax consequence of a shareholder's receiving a section 301 distribution depends upon the "earning and profits" where the distribution was actually made by the distribution corporation. A quick definition: The term “profits and earnings” is a term of art in tax law. In simple words we can describe it as the corporate funds which are distributed to the corporate shareholders without the reduction in their own capital. (BUS, 2014).
Because there is no difference actually in a situation of redemption occurring by pro rata basis to the shareholders and

Related Documents