Warrant

History has allowed for police officers to search an arrestee’s person and vehicle without a warrant under certain circumstances. However, under the Fourth Amendment, is it constitutional for police officers to search through electronic data and information instilled in a cellphone? A cellphone may contain evidence pertaining to crimes, but cellphones also hold an immense amount of personal information of not only the owner’s, but of other people as well. Riley v. California seeks to…

Knowledge management principles are an enduring set of guidelines for managing knowledge that are established by an organization, program, or team (Mar, 2003). Due to the Army’s reduction in force and new governing systems, products, and services continually flooding the Army system, knowledge is perishable and limited. In addition, knowledge management is negatively impacted by the lack of collaboration. Too often, teams and individuals hold on to knowledge as opposed to sharing it with others…

shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” this quote states that in order to search and seize anything on private property they need a warrant. In other words, this means that you cannot be searched or seized without a warrant, that has to be signed by a judge. Search and seize on private property without a warrant is illegal. Also,…

first step that is taken is obtaining a search warrant, & in order to do this there must be probable cause to present to a magistrate. How probable cause is identified is by an investigation, or information obtained in a legal standard& documented by the officer who is seeking the evidence, & he/she must prepare an affidavit that defines the area to be searched, & the evidence being sought (Volonino pp 56). The reason for obtaining a search warrant is so that a defendants Fourth Amendment is…

numerous constitutional questions. One question in particular was asked in the case of DLK v. United States. Agents of the government used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s house from outside. With what was seen from the imager they were able to obtain a warrant, and then make an arrest. Did use of new technology violate DLKs fourth amendment right to have an expectation of privacy in his home and body? Did the government go too far? The government did not go too far in the case of DLK due to the…

The Fourth Amendment is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The goal of this amendment is to protect people’s privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects the people from unreasonable searches and seizures…

Case Citation: United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ¬¬___ (2012). Parties: United States, Plaintiff / Appellant Antoine Jones, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Antoine Jones was a nightclub owner in the District of Columbia that was arrested in 2005 for drug possession after the police attached a GPS tracker to his vehicle. The tracker was attached to the vehicle because Jones was under suspicion of narcotics trafficking. The GPS tracker was authorized for use on the vehicle belonging to Jones’ wife…

domestic surveillance. Plan: The government will curtail its surveillance by only viewing collected data by means of a warrant. Intro-After the NSA reported their first transparency avowal, the publisher Omicron Technology Limited stated, “The report said 19,212 "national security letters"—administrative subpoenas that allow the FBI to collect information without a warrant—were issued last year, containing 38,832 requests for information.” These unwarranted leaks are why this problem needs…

looking through all the content that comes in the country and goes out the country for “security reasons” but have no proof or warrant to allow them to do this. According to theguardian.com, “...the NSA is searching the content of virtually every email that comes and goes out of the United States without a warrant,” (www.theguardian.com). The NSA has no suspicion or warrant to search through anything and are invading people's’ privacy and Fourth Amendment. The NSA believes that they can read and…

when showing him the warrant application. The other issues are that the JP has possibly only read through the application and not asked sufficient detail regarding the application and ‘why’ and for ‘what’ the search is being conducted for. As emphasised in Crowley v Murphy (1981) 34 ALR 496 at 515, "It is for the Justice himself who must be satisfied ... he must ensure that a finding of reasonable grounds is supported by credible facts and circumstances". The facts of the warrant application…