Tort reform

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 21 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ford Pinto Case

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cases involving the explosion of Ford Pinto's due to a defective fuel system design led to the debate of Ford’s use of their a cost-benefit analysis and its decision not to upgrade the fuel system based on this analysis. Ford failed its consumers by not applying risk management during the initial design of the Ford Pinto. Instead it calculated risk based on a strictly functional view which would result in Ford defending their decision based on their cost-benefit analysis. In comparison…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Volenti Non fit Injuria (consent) When a person consents for infliction of an harm upon himself, he has no remedy for that in Tort. That means, if a person has consented to do something or has given permission to another to do certain thing, and if he is injured because of that, he cannot claim damages. However, the action causing harm must not go beyond the limit of what has been consented. Consent, rather informed consent plays a major role in the medical profession. In a New York case…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there is no guidelines as to what exactly constitutes an indirect expropriation, there exists some approaches to determine whether indirect expropriation occurs or not. The following is the domain doctrines in the term of indirect expropriation. 3.2.1 Police Power Doctrine A number of tribunals have attempted to restrict the nature of the protection so that States will not be subject to claims for compensation where the regulation, which might otherwise be tantamount to…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the driver of a car, motorcycle or any motor vehicle that may become involved in a road accident, in general, it can be hard for you to win the case even if you are not the wrong. Especially, if the other party has an attorney of their own, you will be the worst sufferer. For this reason, it's best to hire a competent accident lawyer to fight your case. Obviously, you have to pay this lawyer for their services. However, some lawyers will not charge you until the case is settled. And the price…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ec-1.3 Vs Aba

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lawyer Howe violated Rule 1.3 of ABA's law not to act reasonably and quickly to represent clients because he did not exist. He also violated Rule 5.5 (b) of the Aba Act after Karl told him that he had a new case and did not appropriately respond to Karl's proceedings. Carl failed to present himself and his place as a quasi-legal who violates EC-1.7 (a). Carl accepted the case he agreed with the client on all fees and gave them legal advice, and this was not acceptable and unauthorized of the law…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    business of selling the product that harmed the plaintiff, Or he may be entitled to punitive damages. Punitive damages are damages awarded when the courts feels the the plaintiff, the person bringing the lawsuit, is not properly compensated under the tort. There are organizations for use auto car dealers such as, NIADA, in their Code of Ethics, not to sell, We will employ truth and accuracy in advertising and selling. Pierre's Awesome Car Place would one to have violated the code,…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wally Astor Case Summary

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In reading this article, I found a few cultural missteps made by Wally Astor and his father-in-law, Henry Williams in handling businessman with the Brazilian Auto Parts Manufacturing. First, the owner Henry Williams failed to communicate with the Brazilian businessmen prior to Wally’s arrival that he himself would not be attending, along with personally apologizing. In additional, the foreign businessman wasn’t given any information about Wally and his relation to the business, which made their…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US Supreme Court’s Decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins: How Will It Change Class Action Litigation? RGR – 6/2 research: http://reaction.mayerbrown.com/rs/vm.ashx?ct=24F76F19D3E347A9CCDD89AED0259410DFF555B2DF8E0BD15EE5636069FFCB1CDB7A3A9C4 http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/spokeo-inc-v-robins/ http://www.law360.com/articles/762088/spokeo-without-scalia-the-fate-of-no-injury-class-actions Meta Description: The recent Supreme Court decision in Spokeo vs. Robins will have a lasting…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A tort is a wrongful action that injures or hinders an individual or their property. A tort case is a municipal court proceeding. A tort can be intentional or unintentional (negligence), or it can be a tort of firm liability. If somebody commits a tort, the individual hurt can litigate and get a judgment for damages. A crime is a wrongful proceed that the state or government has recognized as a crime. A lawless individual case is a lawless individual proceeding. The person (the defendant)…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Katherine Heigl Case Study

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    is a well known public figure, being the entertainer she is, she would need protection against false and defamatory statements that are made with actual malice. This includes false endorsements and false publicity which is known of its falsity. The tort, invasion of privacy under the common law, safeguards…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Page 1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 50