Federalist

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Great Essays

    The arguments of federalists and antifederalists definitely are most evident today in the united states’ two party system. Traditionally the federalists advocated for a strong central government whereas the anti-federalists argued for more state rights. These anti-federalists were worried that the Federalists would create a strong central government and do away with giving the states power (Anti-Federalist Papers). They believed that the Federalist system would have too much power and rule over…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    factions that were developing in the states. Federalist; those for the new government vs. Anti Federalist; those who opposed the creation of a stronger u.s government. These were the forces that Washing saw as dangerous to the nation. Although he tried to prevent these factions, Washington and the other leaders of our country were forced to become part of it. In 1787 the amount of federalist and antifederalist was almost even, but the majority of federalist were found along the coast and in…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With these two parties there is still one that is rarely spoken of one of which is the Federalist. The Federalist are supporters of the United States government a U.S. political party founded in 1787 to advocate the establishment of a strong federal government and the adoption by the states of the Constitution. By the 1820’s most of the federal principles had been adopted by the Democratic Party and the Federalist Party was no…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    bitter one: there was constant slandering from both the federalist and the democratic-republican sides, but ultimately Jefferson won. In Thomas Jefferson: Political Compromiser, Morton Borden analyzes Jefferson’s presidency and ideals to question how he achieved so much success: did Jefferson simply adapt to gain support? During his presidency, Jefferson often stuck to his party roots. However, Jefferson also enacted very impartial, federalist policies that underscored Jefferson’s importance as…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States, and The Federalist Papers both outline how a proper republic should be established, with strategies to limit the impact of factions, and create majority and minority rights. Michael Parenti wrote “The Constitution as an Elitist Document”, in which he argues against some of the points made in the Constitution and in the Federalist Papers. John Roche writes “The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action”, he argues overwhelmingly in favor of Madison. In Federalist Paper #10,…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    nine of the thirteen states. Two parties, the Federalists and anti-Federalists, emerged and became entrenched in a fierce debate over the document. Federalists argued in favor of the Constitution, while their opponents argued against it. At the heart of the debate was the question of liberty. Anti-Federalists believed that liberty rests in the individual’s right to self-govern. A central government, they argued, would compromise this right. Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The main issues that divided the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the United States Constitution, Popular Sovereignty, Federal Power, State Power, and the Bill of Rights. Federalists were the supporters of the new constitution. Their biggest concern was making the nation’s government stronger, hoping that it would promote unity and stability. Some known Federalists were George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison. Anti- Federalists were those who opposed the constitution. Their…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    structure and the future of the US. Basically, the debates create two opposing sides. The first side was federalist, while, another side was their opponents, anti-federalist. Basically, both sides work under the role of the national government and their missions are the interest of local communities. In fact, federalists and anti-federalists work on a totally different land. Actually, the anti-federalists who argued that they could not accept the Constitution. Because of the Constitution gave…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    leading up to the drafting of the Alien and Sedition Acts, distinct political parties were forming. The Federalists, who supported the act and were mainly elites, and the Democratic-Republicans, who did not and were mainly working class. The existence of these opposing political opinions led to rapid increase of tensions in the U.S. The government, which was majority Federalist. The Federalists had an unfair advantage and could pass laws to suppress the Democratic-Republicans from voicing their…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    from saying anything controversial about the government. The Alien & Sedition Acts were unconstitutional because newspaper editors and many others were arrested for practicing their freedom of speech, there was a great deal of debate between the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans because the laws weakened the Democratic-Republican…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50