Alien And Sedition Acts Dbq

Good Essays
In the time leading up to the drafting of the Alien and Sedition Acts, distinct political parties were forming. The Federalists, who supported the act and were mainly elites, and the Democratic-Republicans, who did not and were mainly working class. The existence of these opposing political opinions led to rapid increase of tensions in the U.S. The government, which was majority Federalist. The Federalists had an unfair advantage and could pass laws to suppress the Democratic-Republicans from voicing their opinions, including the Alien and Sedition Acts that specifically targeted any dissent against them. President John Adams, a Federalist, drafted the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798. This was caused largely by tensions with France. France …show more content…
Federalists thought the act was needed to secure the safety of the United States. Many believed that any dissent and conflict was dangerous, and Abigail Adams even believed that if dissenters were “not surpressd, we shall come to a civil war” (Abigail Adams 282). One of the Federalists ideals were that they needed a centralized government. The Sedition Act benefited them because it allowed them to weaken the Democratic-Republicans, making it even easier to shape the country to their views. They mainly wanted to stop resistance from agriculturalists and the working class, as they mainly consisted of and were supported by manufacturers, elites, and other influential people. They also viewed the dissenters as too radical, and feared they would become too much like the French Revolution. The people the Sedition Act controlled were the people the Federalists thought were too patriotic and had very radical democracy, and would become more dangerous without their …show more content…
They viewed it as an attempt to keep them out of politics and from voting, because they could not criticize the Federalists in any way (Hewitt and Lawson 231). They thought that the Federalists had too much power and were too elite, but their free speech was taken away and they could not do much about it. In the Virginia Resolution, a response the Sedition Act, James Madison talked about how the power the government was exercising was not only not granted by the constitution, but was also “expressly and positively forbidden by one of the amendments thereto” (James Madison 283). Essentially, the government went against their own constitution that allowed freedom of speech by making it things illegal. They also opposed the Sedition Act because it demonstrated “the political welfare swallowed up in a continual grasp for power” (Matthew Lyon 283). The Federalists were mainly elitists, and cared more about making money and power than about the working class. There was a disconnect between the two groups, and the Sedition Act only proved that further. The act was specifically negative for the working class and agriculturalists that generally did not agree with the Federalists. They legally could not fight back against policies that benefited the elite but hurt them, as their freedom of speech was unlawfully taken away. They feared that the government was becoming tyrannical and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    On the contrary, the Democratic-Republicans supported the Alien and Sedation Act. This became the subject of heavy propaganda on account of the claim that it was unconstitutional. In addition, the Alien and Sedation Act was believed to increase faction amongst the citizens not only because it was highly controversial but also because it…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The only way out of that stage is to be independent and not have to deal with being deceived again. He writes on how the government is evil and ruined the societies. British has not been fair with them through the taxes they brought up frequently, and if they come under control again then they will have to pay more taxes. This made the people agree with him, because he was so right about the Stamp Act issue and of the taxes. This document made people want a revolution because they did not want to deal with the government and its policies.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    State governments will make it too difficult to maintain the national government, they are bias, and Americans should have a firm union in this new nation. Overall, he was completely against state governments. He favored a strong federal government made of many wealthy members. Moreover, Hamilton held a loose interpretation of the Constitution. He even supported sometimes restrictions on speech and press under certain circumstances.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Jeffersonians were very pro French while the Federalist had been very pro British. The Federalist hated when the embargo of 1807 was passed because it greatly hurt relations with Britain and also the economy and the trade with them. The Federalist had like England because trade h to pay off the war debts and without it this plan could not be continued. The embargo was one of the largest uses of presidential authority. Even though Jefferson had claimed to be for small government he was willing to go above this if it meant protecting the country.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They thought that the nation owed a debt to France because they helped the United States for their help in the Revolution. The Democratic Republicans also had a very strict interpretation of the Constitution and they argued that the President did not have the right to declare neutrality, only Congress can declare war between countries. Also by supporting France, Britain may not be the lead trading partner to America, which in turn, can make the nation more self-sufficient. On the contrary the Federalists, supported by their leader Alexander Hamilton, were for neutrality. Their reasoning was that they thought that France only helped the U.S for their own selfish reasons, since they only helped to hurt Britain, there is no debt to repay.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He thinks the Federalists are stuck up, and only in favor of themselves and other wealthy people. That they do not care about the poorer people in this country. Because of the differing views, it lead to a split in political…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This political party held views that power of the Federal government should be limited. Although they did not necessarily condone the violent methods that the rioters used, they believed that the government’s actions were a clear overstep of power. Additionally, the Republicans believed that the Rebellion was a sign that Americans were becoming more aware of the government’s misdeeds, calling most people of the time period “lethargic” to what was happening around them (Hewitt and Lawson). The party also worried about the government’s use of militias and that if the Rebellion had continued the president would have deemed a “standing army necessary for enforcing the laws” (Hewitt and Lawson). (The Pittsburg Resolution, 1794)This was problematic to the Republicans since they had opposed British policies of taxation and quartering and now their new government was behaving similarly.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The strive for perfection was the foundation of the Democratic-Republicans’ hopes and beliefs. For example, the Dem-Repubs yearned for a corrupt-free government, and this was in response to the Federalists’ tenure in office. They stated that corruption “had devastating consequences”, and they had hoped to remove ALL corruption by reversing the Federalist policies. Their secondary method of eradicating corruption is through eradicating those politicians who are “fixed on the nominal value of money”. However, this was an inherent trait that every man exhibited, which furthers the point that they strive for idealistic goals.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They perceived themselves as superior people, so they mistreated others in order to get what they wanted: money and power. America was against liberty and equality when it came to other countries. They only cared about themselves, and lots of innocent people suffered from their actions. They violated people’s rights and they denied them the freedom they inherently…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He does not believe that the collection of taxes is necessary because it was not specifically stated in the Constitution. Jefferson’s point of view is that he thinks that the Federalists are making claims that are not in the Constitution and he thinks their power is useless. “…Cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government…” (Document C). In George Washington’s Farewell Address, he claimed that the government should try its best to not develop political parties. He warned that overtime it would hurt the government because they would not be able to make decisions.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays