Why Should Congress Have Term Limits Essay

Improved Essays
The 28th Amendment: Term Limits Why should congress have term limits? Simple. To get new ideas and people in and older, more generationally out-of-touch, out. Now sure, it’s always good to have some old wisdom to guide the younger, newer congressmen, it’s also good to have new people with new ideas for the ever-changing times we live in. I believe we as a nation need to vote and get congress to pass an amendment to the constitution for congressional term limits. The average age for congress is 59. That’s about 20 years older than the average American voter. I, as a 19-year-old, have someone 40 years older than me making decisions that are influenced by a different time. I think that to help our generation we need to have younger representatives who are more in touch with us to be making decisions about our futures. Now in saying that, we can’t just have any young person put into office. We need someone who is knowledgeable about the economy and how our country works. Here we can see an opportunity for an opponent to term limits say how the more experience and knowledge is more …show more content…
This is called “careerism”. Careerism in congress was first observed in the late 1890’s to early 1900’s when the number of new representatives in the house decline and the number of incumbents rose. Without term limits congressmen, as long as they either stay in favor of the public or can scare off the competition, can be in office indefinitely. Generally, the longer a congressman is in office the more favor he has with the people and the more money he has to fund his re-election campaign. This can hinder the chances of a newer perspective congressman from winning the election. By doing this the incumbents, in a way, “monopolize” the congress. In the 19th century the turnover rate of each new congress was 45%, in the 20th it was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This will hopefully encourage the members to discuss and pass more legislation. This solution is best achieved by an amendment rather than an ordinary law because of the court case mentioned earlier, U.S. Term Limits v Thornton, p. 78. The ruling stated that qualifications for the members of Congress cannot be added unless explicitly stated in the Constitution. In the existing Constitution, they are mostly silent about qualifications of Congress. Although the case above prevents this from surviving if done by ordinary law, there is nothing in the Constitution pertaining to Congress term limits and would not prevent the amendment from surviving.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senators originally were elected by state legislatures to six-year terms to maintain their accountability to their states and to buffer them against constant political pressures faced by House members. Ratified in 1913 as a reform, the 17th Amendment reassigned the Senate election process from legislators to citizens at large. While I respect the admirable efforts of Americans of a century ago to expand the reach of democracy, the 17th Amendment unintentionally broke the link between senators and their state government that their offices were designed to…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each house, however, clashes with one another, making for a broken Congress. In Hamilton and Madison’s On Congress (1788), in order to be in the House of Representatives, one “must be of the age of twenty-five years; must have been seven years a citizen of the United States; must, at the time of his election, be an inhabitant of the State he is to represent” (page 180). If these guidelines are met and one is elected as a representative, two year terms are served; however, there are no limitations to how many terms one may serve. Because of the young age and less time spent per…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of term limits have suggested that a system without term limits allows undeserving politicians to exploit this advantage, and creates to a class of politicians who are ineffective and immovable, and who continue to win elections because of the political money from corrupt influence groups. Fairness in elections is one of the pillars of democracy, and the fact that incumbents are reelected at such high rates is unexpected given the approval ratings of the system as a whole. However, enforcing term limits would not change the electoral security that exists in this system. It would certainly shorten the time over which this may occur, and destroy relations between career politicians and interests groups that they rely on for donations, but term limits would not…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, Presidential candidate, Donald Trump’s views on congressional term limits are made known. Trump has publicly announced that he would like to give a limit for both sections of Congress. He would like to make the House of Representatives have a 3 term limit of 2 years each and the Senate with a length of 2- 6 year terms. He voices his reasoning on the topic, saying that it will end government corruption if we have a change and that it would put an end to the “economic stagnation” that we currently have ourselves in. His most highlighted phrase from this article was that he believed that limiting Congress terms would end “the cycle of Corruption”.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As wonderful as the Constitution is, its creators made a huge oversight by not limiting the time elected officials can serve in public office. These career politicians are unable to truly represent the common…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate on whether congressional representatives should or should not have term limits is still a big issue in the realm of the United States’ political system. This issue has been debated for many years, but is constantly overlooked by congressional representatives from across the country. Having congressional term limits would be extremely beneficial to the political system of the United States, and to the citizens of the United States. Some of the founding fathers were also in favor of creating term limits for representatives. The purpose of this paper is to prove that it would be beneficial for members of Congress to have term limits because it promotes new ideas, prevents corruption, and would have a positive impact on the legislation…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The turnover of politicians in Congress will be greatly increased by adding term limits because Congressmen will not be allowed to stay in office for an extensive period of time. With term limits enacted recurring politicians would not deplete the political system as they do now with their lack of ideas, instead aspiring Congressmen would be welcomed to candidacy by kicking out the old ones and opening the doors of opportunity for countless new candidates who will be competing for the same position. Voters could not base their opinions of the candidates based on past terms that they have served, therefore the candidates must work harder to earn votes, thus creating a very competitive environment for the election, even more than usual. Competition is good to have in elections because it makes the candidates more passionate about persuading the public to vote for them, meaning they will appeal to the public’s apparent needs at the time in order to win them over. Competitive elections often attract more voters than usual because they want to influence the outcome of the election to be in favor of their own beliefs.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Term Limits

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Term limits have given incumbents more power because challengers are now less likely to challenge and political parties have less funding and resources to allocate to races. Prior to term limits, challengers were faced with the option of running or giving an incumbent an even stronger chance of holding a seat hostage and it was because of this that challengers were much more likely to create a competitive campaign against incumbents for closed seats. Now, challengers have the opportunity to wait a relatively small amount of time, to avoid the great nature of electoral competition and wait for an easier opportunity for a win. It is because of…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Members of the House already have to be re-elected every two years and members of the Senate have to be elected six years. (“How Congress Works”, 67) Therefore, it is unfair that a constituents vote must be casted on a candidate who falls between the eligible amount of terms. If a candidate gets re-elected therefore it is what the constituents want. This argument against the implementation of term limits in congress is flawed in many ways.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Term limits on members of Congress has been a debated and at the same time, a very popular issue in our country. Currently, the Constitution doesn’t mention limiting the amount of terms a Congressperson are subject to. They can be reelected indefinitely by their constituents, and this has become a crucial problem in our country. Many of our nation’s leaders are considered “career politicians” because of how long they have been in office; the longer they are in office, the less they really care about why they are in Washington. The trends of Congress and the lack of term limits are quite astounding and if things aren’t changed, they can cause problems for our country and our democracy.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The argument on voting age has been going on for a long time. Lowering the voting age to 16 may decrease the percentage of participation, but it could also be helpful to have younger peoples opinions added. Keeping the voting age at 18 may help increase our percentage of Americans voting. My opinion on this topic would be to keep the voting age at 18. I think the voting age should stay at 18 because I dont think younger people have much intrest in politics.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Lowering Voting Age

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I happen to believe that lowering the voting age is not a very good idea. The reasoning behind my opinion is that children, who are not of the adult age of 18 yet, could be coerced by their parents to vote the way their parents want, instead of having their own educated opinion. The reason that the older generation has a higher voting percentage, according to the newspaper articles, is because the older generation has seen years of politics working or not working in their lifetime to make better judgments in their voting. The older generation also tend to care for more investments than the younger generation, and are more likely to get out and vote in order to protect those investments. The problem we face is an educational…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If term limits were put into the Constitution, citizens from different backgrounds are given an opportunity in government. When career elected officials stay in office, new people and ideas are hard to come by because of a seniority system that allows keeping power above advancing the best policy.…

    • 48 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Millennials in Politics (1) Amongst the millennial generation today, millennials are perceived as being self entitled and only worried about their own self preservation. The author Ron Fournier argues that many people from different generations are frustrated and strongly believe that the millennial generation will cause a great downfall in our political system today due to their lack of confidence in our government. Fournier in his essay, discusses the common misconceptions about millennials and refutes them with examples of how millennials are taking big steps to radically change our political system. Similar to Fournier, authors David and Jack Cahn, address the various doubts other generations have about millennials, but counter this misconception with how this generation is the exact opposite of these stereotypes and exemplify what they can really achieve in our political system. This Cahn “manifesto” extends Fournier’s logical conclusion about revolutionary, or worse, millennial political goals.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays