Should Animal Testing Be Abolished

Improved Essays
Animal Rights

When it comes to the topic of animal rights, most of us will readily agree that animal testing should be abolished. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question whether there are alternative replacements which are proven successful. Whereas some are convinced that animals shouldn’t be used because they’re very different from human beings and the results are not accurate. In my view, I agree that we should eliminate animal testing because the results may be successful on animals but can cause death in humans. However, I can see why many are for animal testing because there have been several case studies where drugs were medically accurate for human consumption. One reason animal testing should be removed is that animals and humans are different in anatomy and in the way the body functions. Humans have a profoundly complex
…show more content…
Animals produce different enzymes which can remove certain diseases that humans can’t just like humans produce different enzymes that animals can’t. Animal’s bodies react differently than the body of a human when it comes to certain diseases. There are some diseases in which the animals reaction was the same as a humans which doesn’t necessarily mean every medication given to animals would work the same in a human.
All in all, animal testing should be abolished there is no need to harm animals when there are different procedures in testing medications. With all the technology we have and with all the proof that these other ways to test drugs are safer and have more of an advantage. Also, with studies that prove 92% of the drugs harm human’s severely. So much money going to waist with so many alternatives for testing yet Scientists don’t seem to understand we don’t need animals anymore. So why do they keep insisting on using animals when testing out new

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Animal Testing Satire

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing Don’t you just love animals? Well, we should stop animal testing, no it’s not good for them. You’re probably thinking we should know more about how the expirementaion effect of drugs worked on animals. How would you feel if someone tested drugs on you to see if it worked on another species.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been multiple trials of humans testing that have failed, which have caused many people to be opposed to animal testing. The opposing side of animal testing believes; animal research does not have to be the only technique available to develop medicines and cosmetic products for the society. Researchers are trying to find alternative ways to obtain new knowledge and research to help better the human society. Kelly James-Enger, the author, of “Beyond Animal Testing,” states, “using animals to predict how humans will respond to drugs or other medical treatments is ‘bad science.’…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If something does not work on an animal they do not even try it on a human (Dawn ch. 6). This means that money is wasted on the tests and animals are killed for tests that are not even considered for humans. If a test does not work on an animal, it could still potentially work on a human, but because it did not pass the rat test, humans do not even have a chance with it. Animal testing is ineffective. Animals are not exactly like humans and their skin reacts to chemicals differently (“About” 4).…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the FDA, 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal test, fail in humans(Klausner). It is time for scientist to divorce the idea of researching on animals and adapt to using methods like in vitro testing, computer models, and human tissues. Former U.S. national Institutes of Health director, Elias Zerhouni, said ,“We have moved away from studying human disease in humans. … We all drank the Kool-Aid on that one, me included. … The problem is that [animal testing] hasn’t worked, and it’s time we stopped dancing around the problem.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People, especially scientists, are hurting innocent animals that did no harm to anyone. Animal testing shouldn't be allowed to happen because animals are getting hurt, they are not protected, and animals get mistreated. One reason that animal testing shouldn’t be allowed is because animals are getting hurt. For instance, the Draize eye test involves rabbits having their eyelids clipped open for as long as multiple days so that they don’t blink the product being tested away. Popular cosmetic brands like L'oreal, Lancome, Estee Lauder, and S.C. Johnson are used on animals.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is proven by scientist Dr. Harr, a rabbit specialist, that rabbit eyes are barely like humans and they do not have the same reaction to products as humans do; only five to twenty-five percent of animal test are accurate on humans (ProCon.org) (Buzzle, Articles). Researchers have tested on animals for cancer research for years and it is proven scientist can never get the actual human form of cancer through an animal. Medical experts agree that data collected from drug testing on animals cannot be given directly to human patients safely test on animals, why hold animals captive in cages if the test we are running on them is not 100% accurate? 88% of stillborn births recorded are caused by medicine that is passed as "safe" on animal testing. While aspirin fails animal test, insulin causes animal birth defects, those are important drugs in common households today (Buzzle,…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As said before, animals and humans have very different internal systems which means that some chemicals that would be harmful to animals could be perfectly fine to give to humans. An example of this is the drug aspirin. Aspirin is harmful to some animal species but alright to give to humans. Animal testing for medical purposes is pretty much worthless. Instead of wasting all the time…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary The use of animal testing is very popular today in the advancement of medicine, but the costly effects outweigh the benefits. There are many cost effective and positive alternatives to animal testing. It is not useful for the advancements of medicine and is only still around today for the financial benefits that come with these tests. Can we truly eliminate animals from medical research?…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is Animal Testing Worth

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are many good reasons for this. One reason was stated in an article written by Ian Murnaghan which said, “The unfortunate aspect is that many of the animals receive tests for substances that never see approval, public consumption, or use.” On that account, it does not make sense to spend large amounts of money, not only once but several times to test products on animals that people would never use. By spending a lot of money on animal testing, it is killing animals and it is not fair that they have to suffer for people not to use the substance that harmed an innocent…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Every year millions of animals die from prescription drug testing. These tests have created multiple cases of abusive behavior that haven’t been made aware. Animal testing is a topic that needs to be fought against and not ignored. Animal testing should be changed because it’s abusive and has harmful tendencies. Reducing animal testing may also help population issues.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One very strong reason to stop testing on animals is it isn't reliable. First of all we have completely different anatomy (body parts). Obviously we and animals have different body parts, that means different cells, different organs, different DNA, and different functions, how can we count on the medicine that works for them to work for us. Another thing our toxic metabolism isn't in compare. And with different metabolisms, our tolerances will be different,so the amounts that work for them or don’t will be different for humans.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For instance, according to PETA scientists at Harvard’s Wyss Institute are using in-vitro testing as a replacement for animal models and costs have reduced from $32,000 to $11,000. Because the animal models used to develop medicinal drugs are not predictive of the human situation, in-vitro testing is more suitable since it contains human cell cultures, which best fits human circumstances. This option of implementing human-related tests makes data more reliable and accurate. Also, utilizing substitutes like these are guaranteed to be more cost-effective. Therefore, using animals to develop certain drugs is unnecessary now that there is a much more innovative way to do…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine being separated from your family at birth, thrown into a cage, fed badly, forgotten about, unloved, and tortured through some of the most terrifying and worst pain? This is the daily life of a test animal. It is horrible, torturous, and unfair. Animal testing should be forbidden in every country. It is a completely pointless thing to do, and creates many negative effects on both animals and people.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well the fact is that whether we use animals or not, there will always be a first person to test a new drug. The FDA has noted that 92% of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous. Out of that 8% that pass the human trial, half of them will need to be re- labeled because of side effects that showed in the human test, but not the animal. III. There was a paper published in the British medical Journal titled " Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?"…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Animal Testing Should Be Banned Everyday innocent animals are being forced into labs and tested for human research advancement. Cruelty Free International states how approximately 115 million animals, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats, mice, dogs and monkeys are used in dangerous laboratory experiments every year. In fact, many of the experiments are said to be useless tests, as stated, “The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable” (“Animal Testing is Bad Science”). Misconceptions by the media may stretch the idea how animal testing can cure diseases, illnesses etc.. But actually, as emphasized, animal testing is an inefficient way of finding medical advances, making the procedures to be unnecessary and making there be no reason to force animals into labs without a choice, it's blatantly a waste of animals lives.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays