Why Do Guns Dont Kill Essay

Improved Essays
Guns Don’t Kill
Every year guns are used over 80 times more often to protect a life than to take one.(Guns In America). Donald Trump argued that tighter gun laws would not help at all in preventing mass shootings, but just make it worse, saying that people with mental illness will always "slip through the cracks." (Stricter Gun Laws). No matter what laws the government makes, criminals will still always get their hands on guns, but “the only thing that stops a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun.”(Only way to stop). It is an American right to bear arms as it states in the constitution in the second amendment. As Thomas Jefferson said “No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms within his own lands or tenements." (Gun Control Quotes). Some may think that tighter gun laws would prevent these incidents of mass shootings from happening, but criminals will always find a way to get guns.
The second amendment implies that every citizen has the right of gun ownership for self-defense, and personal use. On December 14th,
…show more content…
Criminals will always get their hands on guns even with stricter gun laws, the people need to defend themselves. Gun free zones are no help, it just makes it easier for crazy people to kill people without being stopped. Armed citizens would be able to fight back in those situations where mass shootings happen, and overall save many lives. There should be fewer laws on the restriction of guns, to get a gun all you should need is a background check and to take a class on how and when to use a gun. No laws will stop or prevent these shootings from ever happening, but just take more and more freedoms away from the people. Why should the American people have to suffer with more restrictions on guns because of the criminal’s actions, when they should be the ones who get punished not the good

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Do Guns Save Lives

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages

    People know that guns can cost lives because the media repeat this message endlessly, as if we could not figure it out for ourselves. But even someone who reads newspapers regularly and watches numerous television newscasts may never learn that guns also save lives. The honest measure of the protective benefits of guns are the lives saved, the injuries prevented, the medical costs saved, and the property protected. Only 0.1% (1 in a thousand) of the defensive uses of guns results in the death of the…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bear Arms Dbq

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Due to the human nature of self-defense, sport, and surviving, the second amendment will always remain relevant in society. Although there are many regulations as to who can own a gun, where they are allowed, and requiring a permit to carry and concealed weapon, the second amendment still protects and grants the right of the militia and citizens to “keep and bear arms”. In order to ensure that the government couldn’t take away the citizens firearms, the founding fathers preserved their right to self-defense with the ratification of the second amendment on December 15, 1791. In today's society, Americans are still trying to defend their right to bear arms.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratified in December 1791, the second amendment provides U.S. citizens the right to bear arms. The second amendment gives every citizen the right to own a gun free of federal regulations, to protect themselves in the face of danger. In the article The Second Amendment & the Right to Bear Arms” by Chad Brooks, James Madison proposed “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The amendment militia clause was never meant to restrict each citizen’s rights to bear arms. This amendment is based on our god given right, as well as the founders believed that the greatest protection we have to ensure our liberty is an armed citizenry.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bringing it all together, the Second Amendment is not just the right to bear arms, but also the right to self-protection and have freedom. From the first trial to the many ongoing current trials, the second amendment, just like every law, is open to interpretation and will be looked at many different ways but they can never take it…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although there are different views of what the Second Amendment really means, the reality is that in the U.S, citizens are allowed to own firearms. With the seemingly recent surge of public shootings over the past few years in places such as Newtown, Connecticut; and Aurora, Colorado,…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2nd Amendment Arguments

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 2nd amendment is a very popular topic in today’s society and most have posted about the 2nd amendment. In my opinion and interpretation of the amendment it is pretty cut and dry. The founding fathers deemed it necessary to afford law abiding citizens the right to bear arms. As a citizen of this country it is my privilege, yes I said “privilege” not right to bear arms. I should be able to buy any weapon of my choosing whether it be for home defense, the defense of my family or for recreational use.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states that the government cannot take away your firearms because you have the right to own them and the government cannot take that right away from you. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to have firearms for any appropriate purpose. You can use firearms for self-protection, recreation, competition, hunting, or collecting. Most Americans believe that the Second Amendment protects their individual rights. There are many reasons that our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution was created as a part of the Bill of Rights in 1791. This Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, but different interpretations of this amendment have encouraged a long-running debate over the rights of individual citizens to buy, own and carry firearms and gun control legislation. Prior to the framing of this amendment the word “militia” referred to assemblies of able bodied men who organized in order to watch over their communities, colonies and eventually states, once the United States gained its independence from Great Britain in 1776. At the time, many believed that the government only used soldiers in order to oppress the people. In turn many people believed…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states:” A well- regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” - https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment. This means that people can own guns and weapons in the United States. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution, with the help of James Madison, on December 15, 1791 from the Bill of Rights. This Amendment came through the English men. Many men owned guns to defend themselves and their families, and also in some cases, to get food.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial Amendments today is the ‘Right to Bear Arms.’ As I get older, I see life a lot more differently and how the Amendments can either be used in our favor as Americans or hurt us. To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791, the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That not only will not decrease the number of criminals have guns, but also decrease the number of law-abiding citizens have guns, which make law-abiding citizens lose ability of self – protection. The more important thing is that sources of crime is the people’s thoughts and desires. Each of the shootings the killers was the person who shot, not the gun itself. The Government cannot simply rudely to solve this problem by the way of the gun ban. In the article “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson wrote that “Our goal should not be the disarming of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Going back to the idea that the government could take away all the firearms from civilians, we have to face the fact that even that would not protect anyone. Instead, it would put many people in danger. The law to take away guns would not affect criminals, because criminals do not follow the law. Without guns for protection, the law-abiding citizens would be helpless to defend themselves against the criminals who would now be the only citizens with guns. The law that was meant to protect would actually lead to the victimization and possible death of law-abiding citizens.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Bitto). But there comes a point where there shouldn’t be firearms in the hands of criminals, drug dealers, fugitives, the mentally unstable, and other unpredictable people who can’t deal with this responsibility (“Shootings Expose...”). There are many cases where this fear of someone handling a gun they aren’t responsible enough. For example, under regulations implemented in 1993, soldier aren’t allowed to carry weapons and caused a mass shooting ending the lives of many soldiers. There needs more regulations taken, but the soldier who fight for our country deserve the right to protect themselves as well (Stockman).…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays