2nd Amendment Arguments

Improved Essays
The 2nd amendment is a very popular topic in today’s society and most have posted about the 2nd amendment. In my opinion and interpretation of the amendment it is pretty cut and dry. The founding fathers deemed it necessary to afford law abiding citizens the right to bear arms. As a citizen of this country it is my privilege, yes I said “privilege” not right to bear arms. I should be able to buy any weapon of my choosing whether it be for home defense, the defense of my family or for recreational use.
Where it becomes unclear to some is how does the militia tie into. I honestly have no idea how a militia is even in the same sentence. The government has stated on numerous occasions we need stricter gun laws and ban the use or purchase of assault rifles. I do, however agree that the gun laws need to be stricter on who can buy and where. All background checks should be completed according to the federal governments guidelines. I am a law abiding citizen and because some people feel guns are the problem and not the actually user of the weapon they want to take my right to bear arms. Some believe that you do not belong to a militia so you do not have the right to bear arms strictly opinion and
…show more content…
It’s a fact of life to have disagreements and I truly respect everyone’s opinion even one that doesn’t agree with the 2nd amendment and the right to bear arms. It is truly a discussion I enjoy having. If one has the proper training to handle the weapon of choice within reason of caliber, then there shouldn’t even be a discussion. I honestly think the government just wants take all our rights away or try to incorporate new laws and regulations making it extremely difficult to purchase the weapon but it still will not fix the problem. If someone wants the weapon that bad they will find a way to get it. Many things in this world are illegal and have been, but guess what a criminal can get their hands on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment- The second amendment has been at times the cornerstone of political controversies or arguments throughout the decades due to what many would construe as an open ended interpretation by the founding fathers on the right of an American to own a firearm. The first and in many cases major line of ‘defense’ (no pun intended) for gun advocates, stating the original ideology of the founding fathers and those who founded this nation was a nation based on the freedom to bear arms for ones self interests. The amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” , and many feel as though the key words are ‘shall not be…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Interpreting the Second Amendment In the Bill of Rights, the citizens are given the privilege to own firearms for their personal protection. However, the Second Amendment seemed to take away this right by adding the concept of “organized militia.” In Columbia v. Heller, the court held that individuals could possess firearms without having to be the members of a militia. However, judge Stevens gave a dissent stating that all judgments should be made with the direction of past cases and court decisions. His main argument came from the fact that gun control laws had not been made unconstitutional.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. This amendment was instituted to the Constitution on December 15, 1791 and means that any person in our country has the right to own and bear arms at any point and that the right may not be taken from you. Although James Madison did not invent the right to bear arms he did in fact wright the second amendment. The framers of this amendment decided it was important to be able to bear arms because of the success they found of having guns in the previous war [the English men also just enjoyed the use of arms]. Although this is still an amendment today it still has gone through a lot of debate.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The root of the debate is to whether or not the Second Constitutional Amendment is meant to protect an individual’s right to bear arms. The real question is do American citizens have the right to bear arms? If they bear this right then to what extent and what kind should be allowed. With the advancements in weaponry in modern times American citizens should have the right to certain arms for their own protection, but not the right to all weapons available. While the legality of ownership has been upheld this far for citizens in the United States the technology of weaponry has certainly changed.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the National Guard) away. The pro gun side in a nutshell believes it’s a fundamental right of Americans to purchase and own firearms. Now within these groups there are views expressed on the far left and the far right, some for limited gun control while other feel any ban is unconstitutional. To start, I’m Pro 2nd amendment, to a point, because I’m also pro gun control to a point. It’s my thinking that most people want sane, law abiding citizens to be able to obtain firearms to protect themselves from criminals, while also wanting society to be able to protect themselves from crazy, insane or violent criminals by enacting stricter gun control laws so that mentally deranged individuals are unable to obtain easy to purchase firearms.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bringing it all together, the Second Amendment is not just the right to bear arms, but also the right to self-protection and have freedom. From the first trial to the many ongoing current trials, the second amendment, just like every law, is open to interpretation and will be looked at many different ways but they can never take it…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first reason why the second amendment is important is because we are an uncommon nation, to have the right to own arms so why change it. Alexander Hamilton, Founding Father, said “The Constitution shall never be constructed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arm”. That means that the constitution will never be built to stop peaceable citizens from owning guns. I think he meant as long as we are peaceable citizens, we shall have the right to own guns and if…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states that the government cannot take away your firearms because you have the right to own them and the government cannot take that right away from you. The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to have firearms for any appropriate purpose. You can use firearms for self-protection, recreation, competition, hunting, or collecting. Most Americans believe that the Second Amendment protects their individual rights. There are many reasons that our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Second Amendment states:” A well- regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” - https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment. This means that people can own guns and weapons in the United States. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution, with the help of James Madison, on December 15, 1791 from the Bill of Rights. This Amendment came through the English men. Many men owned guns to defend themselves and their families, and also in some cases, to get food.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The day begins just like any other in a quiet, small town, when out of nowhere a suspicious man enters the local bank and confidently states that this is a holdup. All of the innocent bystanders inside the bank are physically incapacitated initially out of fear as the bank robber brandishes his intimidating firearm while giving directions to the civilians not to move or speak unless exclusively instructed to do so at his command. The man also warns them not to try anything sneaky or else he will be compelled to do something crazy. The suspect makes his way to the bank tellers at which point he aggressively grabs one of the employees by the shirt and demands they empty the vaults and hand over the funds to him. Meanwhile, one of the hostages…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If one person does not feel that owning firearms is right for them, they don’t have to buy them, but they should not attempt to tell someone else that because they don’t want a gun, the other person shouldn’t have one either. Most importantly, the second amendment must be preserved. There are those who feel since the wording on the bill of rights says to “form a well-armed militia” and since America has a fine full time fighting force the need for a militia is no longer present, and they would have a pretty good argument. But reflecting back on the George Washington’s letter in the Federalist papers, and the Supreme Court ruling, the right to keep and bear arms is about so much more than being able to stand up an army.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To continue, the second amendment means the people of America have the right to have a gun for the safekeeping of our country. This affects gun control policies by saying anyone can have a gun. If the government wanted to ban guns, they are taking away the country’s freedom. Also, they would be taking guns away from the Militia, so if the army was in a different country and people attack America, the Militia would have no way of fighting back.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most disputed debates in the modern world is over the Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (“Second Amendment”).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most controversial Amendments today is the ‘Right to Bear Arms.’ As I get older, I see life a lot more differently and how the Amendments can either be used in our favor as Americans or hurt us. To be more clear, the ‘Right to Bear Arms’ is the second Amendment of the United States Constitution passed by Congress September 25, 1789. Ratified December 15, 1791, the first 10 amendments form the Bill of Right. It is a well regulated Militia; being necessary to the security of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays