What Is The Rhetorical Situation In Julius Caesar

Improved Essays
There's many different things that authors incorporate into their writings to make them superior and so they can persuade people easier. In Julius Caesar Shakespeare uses rhetorical situation to help him create masterpieces, he also uses a certain style, appeal and arrangement. In act three Shakespeare has two characters Brutus and Antony include those devices in their speeches to persuade the people to be on their side. Antony has a better argument than Brutus because he uses arrangement, appeal, style, and rhetorical situation much better. Put yourself into the plebeians shoes….
To tell the truth, Antony had a much better argument than Brutus. The most obvious reason is he went after Brutus and everyone knows that you remember the speaker
…show more content…
First he undermines Brutus and conspirators and gets the plebeians questioning are they really honorable? Next he brings their emotions in and talks about the love caesar carried for them. Then telling Plebeians they are in his will so they will be obtaining some good things. So far Antony just went from questioning the honor of the other and telling you how much better caesar was and had more honor than the others, he also loved them. He then brings it to the deep emotions, he says “If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.” (III.ii.181) he continues by showing them the body and then finishing by angering them. Remember that this is a course of pages long, Antony had been setting them up perfectly for awhile. Now look at Brutus little paragraph he starts with I am honorable but so is Caesar, he continues with how he loved Caesar and he only did it to help Rome but then didn’t keep explaining that. He finishes with “If any speak for him have I offended.” (III.ii.33-34) Saying he sorry if had offended anyone with his speech. His arrangement wasn’t good because his argument wasn’t

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From Ancient Literature to modern day writings, Aristotle's rhetoric had influenced authors to induce by appealing to a reason or an understanding. One of the famous writings, well-known for its significant use of ethical, logical and emotional appeals was William Shakespeare's, Julius Caesar. In other words, one of the main characters, Mark Antony relies upon Aristotle’s rhetorical strategies - ethos, pathos, and logos - within William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar to persuade the Plebeians to revolt against the murderers of Caesar and start a civil war in Rome. Firstly, Mark Antony uses ethical appeals to establish his authority as an honorable individual among the Plebeians.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Brutus and Antony are able to use the skill of rhetoric to get what they want, but who used it better? Antony is cunning and uses rhetoric effortlessly in his speech. After Brutus speaks to the crowd, Antony is next and he persuades the people to his side by countering Brutus about everything he said. His speech is powerful and he moves the crowd so deeply they begin to riot and kill innocent people. Antony used pathos and grabbed the Roman people's attentions by getting to their emotions.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare was able to show how rhetorical devices are able to persuade an audience. In Shakespeare’s play, Mark Antony, who was loyal to Caesar, delivered a speech to Romans that supported Brutus after the funeral of Caesar. The speech conveyed why Caesar was a loyal Roman. By depending on expressing emotions, usage of diction, and logic of the argument, Antony persuades the Roman citizens that Caesar had more loyalty than Brutus. Throughout his speech, Antony appeals to the audience’s emotions to persuade the audience that Caesar was a virtuous leader who did not deserve a premature death.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus says “not that I loved Caesar less, but that i loved/ Rome more” (III, ii, 23-24), he is using pathos to appeal to the Plebeians through their love and loyalty to Rome, which can make them betray anyone, even Caesar, whom they loved. Brutus also uses rhetorical questions to address the audience including ”Had you rather Caesar were living, and/ die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all/ freemen” (III, ii, 24-26). This rhetorical question is used to make the Plebeians think about what is better for their life by making them choose between being free without Caesar or slaves with Caesar. Lastly, Antony uses verse format in his speech while Brutus uses prose, which make it easier to appeal to the masses by speaking the ordinary form of the…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people were so outraged they wanted to assassinate those who killed Caesar. This is proof Antonys speech was more…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although people generally believe they are persuaded by ideas that they have discovered, William Shakespeare’s historic tragedy, Julius Caesar illustrates that an individual’s thoughts are inevitably shaped by external factors. Persuasion and suggestion are rhetorical skills that play central roles in Julius Caesar, but they also demonstrates how individuals bend towards words they want to hear when faced with a difficult situation. The play cautions the dangers and powers of rhetoric as a tool for manipulation and reminds us how easily and completely an audience can be both won and lost in terms of persuasion. In the few early scenes we are able to see Cassius promoting his own views upon Brutus.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The use of rational speech is more distinctive of a human being than the use of his limbs” (Aristotle, Rhetoric). In Aristotle’s book Rhetoric he elaborates on the three rhetorical devices; ethos, logos, and pathos. These devices are found frequently in Shakespeare’s writings, particularly in Julius Caesar. Rhetorical devices are tools of persuasive writing which influence readers through appeals such as credibility, logic, and emotion. To begin, Ethos is a rhetorical device which appeals to credibility or authority.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to defending a Caesar’s dead body Antony had to go back in the past to things he has done for the people, and he is not even defending himself. Not alone that Antony has to worry about the conspirators, he even sent a servant to the scene of murder to make sure he was not a target on the group of conspirators list. Consequently, leading to Antony fearing for his life while giving his speech. Then after he gave his speech he was able not only calm the crowd, but to convince them to go against the conspirators and want kill them. Overall while Brutus’s speech was exceptional and was able to calm the crowd and change their minds into thinking Caesar was a tyrant.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Once they do however, Antony 's speech becomes much more interesting. Each seemingly complimentary statement about Brutus and the others becomes a disguised insult. Every kind word is another jab. This is another tactic used by Antony to dance around Brutus 's demands, and one that works…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony states his direct purpose and asks for his audience’s attention outright, thus creating mutual respect through ethos by addressing his peers as equals. In addition, Antony appeals to the crowd’s emotions by mentioning Caesar’s will and how every citizen lies within in lines 132 and 133 of scene 2 in Act III. This employment of pathos riles up the audience and influences them to join his side, yet it also creates a leash with which Antony ties to the crowd to fulfill his agenda. Continuing, Antony leaves nothing to chance or opinion by focusing on the fact that he has no business in disproving Brutus’ words, but only to speak what he knows (III. ii. 100-101). Antony manipulates ethos in this instance to protect his integrity by addressing that his goal does not lie within feuding with another.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays