Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Improved Essays
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome.
Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians. Out of the three rhetorical appeals Brutus uses Logos the least. Throughout most of his speech he avoids explaining why he participated in murdering Caesar. He keeps on telling the Plebeians that eventually he will tell them, but he never truly tells them why he did. Ultimately Brutus does give some reasoning; he tells the plebeians that Caesar’s ambition became too great and that they all would have ended up as slaves. “Who is here so base that would be a bondman?” (III.2.33-34). In Brutus’s eyes Caesar did not love all the people of Rome and would have turned against them. Logos turns
…show more content…
Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses. Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “An enemy can partly ruin a man, but it takes a good-natured injudicious friend to complete the thing and make it perfect.” It takes time to learn to trust someone just to leave it all behind. Julius Caesar had learned to trust Brutus. He was a noble friend to Caesar until he didn’t know if he cared more about Rome or friendship. Cassius decided to “help” Brutus with his decision.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus recites a speech in the market place after Caesar’s death the speeches exemplify parallelism, verbal irony, and witty use of rhetoric. With the Roman public watching on eager to see a reprisal for the death of Caesar, Brutus uses the undetected technique of coercion on the Romans taking advantage of their easily susceptible minds. In his speech he proclaims his love for Caesar passionately stating “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his”. With the public making up their minds, Brutus plays his pathos card, showing he really did care for Caesar but claims, “Have you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” .Here…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The speech that Antony gave sparked a rage in the crowd and forced the conspirators to flee Rome. This leads to another bad decision that Brutus made. During the battle at the end of the play, Brutus thinks that victory was achieved when in reality, it was not. Titinius said, “ O Cassius, Brutus gave the word too early; Who having some advantage on Octavius, took it too eagerly: his soldiers fell to spoil” (V.iii.5-8).…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare’s political play Julius Caesar is one in which its namesake, Caesar, is murdered by a group of conspirators. Following this, Brutus attempts to persuade the audience that he acted for the best interest of Rome, claiming that Caesar would have become a dictator. However, the commoners of Rome were never satisfied with the reasoning for Caesar’s death. This was caused due to multiple reasons, mainly which they had already established their support for Caesar and Brutus’ inadequate speech which fails to justify his actions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Brutus ends his speech the crowd cheers and concurs that Caesar needed to die, but they stay and listen to Antony because Brutus says too and the crowd believes he is honorable in line 1583. Antony ends his speech and the crowd cheers because of agreement and wants revenge based on Antony’s words alone (1700). The crowd cheers for both speakers, but only stands with Antony’s speech. In conclusion, Brutus was naive to Cassius’ jealousy, and Antony was ignorant to Caesar’s fear, leading to the death of the greatest warrior and political leader of Rome.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus is revealed to be a naive individual corrupted by his honourable beliefs and his wish to uphold his duty to the people. Through the use of diction, imagery and irony, Brutus repeatedly attempts to justify his planned assassination of Caesar believing it to be for the common good of Rome. Brutus is unable to understand nor recognize the faults of his plan due to his loyalty to the republic and unwavering determination. Brutus’ attempts to belittle his true motives to assassinate Caesar displays his wish to seem more honourable as well as his obliviousness to the true manipulative natures of his peers, such as Cassius.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two funeral speeches for Caesar At the art iii, the Caesar was killed by the conspiracy. Both of Antony and Brutus do the funeral speech with beautiful words for him, they have completely different standpoint, but I think that Antony’s speech make me find most convincing. From Brutus's speech, He said that tyranny is dead, if the Caesar become the lord, all of the Roman people will not get the freedom.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He implies Caesar’s ambitions would cause Rome to diminish, which caused him to assassinate him. Antony, however, influences the individuals who surrounded him that Caesar was not ambitious and therefore Brutus and the Conspirators were not honorable men, in order to cause the common people to revolt against the Conspirators. Both Anthony and Brutus express their outlook on Caesar’s death, in order to persuade their audience to comprehend either of their point of views, however, Antony’s speech is ultimately superior to Brutus’s. During Caesar’s funeral, Antony demonstrates his individual perspective regarding the situation by applying his position within Rome.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And Brutus is an honorable man,"(3.2, Pages 3-4). Although the word before "Brutus" changes, the meaning of the phrase still has the same impact on the group gathered; they began to doubt what Brutus had said to them as it conflicted with what they had seen. If Caesar was ambitious, they reasoned, then why had he not taken the crown the first, second, or third time it was offered to him. They began to wonder, as Antony had undoubtedly wanted them to, if perhaps Brutus and Cassius were the ones who were ambitious for they had killed Caesar and told the public they wanted what was best for Rome, knowing that as they said this, the plebeians would wish them to become the new leaders. Mark Antony had the Romans see the metaphorical light he wanted them to see because it suited his purposes.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Continuing off of changing their opinion in favor of Caesar, they now change it against him and celebrate his death. The Plebeians’ opinion on Caesar’s death begins to change when the First Plebeian says, “I will hear Brutus speak” (3.2.9). This opens up their minds to hearing the reasons in which the conspirators killed Caesar. Although this statement does not ensure the Plebeians will completely change their views, it definitely foreshadows that it will happen. Brutus responds by first stating, “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his” (3.2.19-21).…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Julius Caesar, Brutus dives into the pretentious idea that Julius Caesar possesses an excess of negative attributes that hinder justice from occurring - attributes which he decides to reveal at the time of his speech. As an honorable figure in Rome, Brutus makes it specifically clear to everyone that for the good of Rome, Julius Caesar deserves "death for [the] ambition [he displays in the past]" (III.ii.1562). Although Brutus addresses many topics in his speech, the particular reason that he gives for killing Caesar essentially consists of serving justice for Rome, a statement which no one in the crowd dares disagree with. Taking this into account, Brutus 's starting statement of the essentiality of showing utmost loyalty towards a greater party or union instantly receives more support. To achieve even further results, after introducing the wrongs Caesar demonstrates as a leader, Brutus goes beyond accusations by attributing to his personal emotions as one who mourns for a dear friend yet still manages to remain loyal to his country.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays