Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Improved Essays
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar No matter what the circumstances, people always look for someone to blame. Caesar’s murder results in the plebeians needing to blame someone for what happened. Despite Brutus’s honor and respect among the Romans, Antony gave the more convincing speech at Caesar’s funeral by having an emotional impact on the Romans, therefore proving to them that the conspirators committed an injustice to Rome.
Brutus first speaks at Caesar’s funeral with the goal of justifying his actions to the plebeians. Out of the three rhetorical appeals Brutus uses Logos the least. Throughout most of his speech he avoids explaining why he participated in murdering Caesar. He keeps on telling the Plebeians that eventually he will tell them, but he never truly tells them why he did. Ultimately Brutus does give some reasoning; he tells the plebeians that Caesar’s ambition became too great and that they all would have ended up as slaves. “Who is here so base that would be a bondman?” (III.2.33-34). In Brutus’s eyes Caesar did not love all the people of Rome and would have turned against them. Logos turns out as a disadvantage for Brutus which Antony easily points out when he speaks. For Ethos, Brutus reminds the plebeians of his honor and status in Rome. Ironically, he emphasizes the importance of the closeness of him and Caesar. Ethos gives credibility to Brutus; he uses it as an expo so the plebeians think that they can trust him. Finally Brutus really hits the plebeians hard with pathos. Brutus truly does have good intentions and he tells the plebeians that. “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (III.2.25-26). By using a line like this, the plebeians become more likely to believe that it really did hurt him to kill Caesar but he did it for the good of Rome. Although he truly loved Caesar, he put the plebeians first. Even though the Romans first believe that Brutus truly did what he did for Rome, his lack of Logos ends up hurting him when Antony speaks. Giving Antony the opportunity to speak last promotes allegiance to him because his speech would be fresh in the Romans mind and he can easily say whatever he wants. Brutus and Antony differ in how they use Ethos. While Brutus speaks about his honor, Antony simply speaks in blank verse. Honorable nobles speak in blank verse so by speaking in blank verse, Antony establishes an authority aura to the plebeians. With pathos Antony kicks it off with bringing Caesar’s body onto the stage. He brings the Roman’s dead leader onto the stage, stab wounds
…show more content…
Brutus’ speech creates an understanding from the plebeians of the moral obligation of Caesar’s death. After hearing Antony’s speech the romans experiences a lot of anger and decide to burn down the houses of all the conspirators and kill them. “We will be revenged” (III.3.198). The anger inside of the plebeians proves to create irrational thoughts which results in them killing an innocent man who just happens to have the same name as one of the conspirators. In addition to that they also go to destroy the conspirators’ houses. Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “An enemy can partly ruin a man, but it takes a good-natured injudicious friend to complete the thing and make it perfect.” It takes time to learn to trust someone just to leave it all behind. Julius Caesar had learned to trust Brutus. He was a noble friend to Caesar until he didn’t know if he cared more about Rome or friendship. Cassius decided to “help” Brutus with his decision.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus and Mark Antony 's motivation for their speech was almost the opposite of one another to a certain extent. Brutus felt a great amount of sorrow and remorse, and tried to appeal to the ethos and Logos of the public to gain there trust and respect. He also reminisced upon his and Caesars friendship, and very clearly stated he only followed through for the good of Rome. Brutus only desired to stop the tyranny that Julius Caesar was provoking, and protect the health and success of his country. Brutus uses logical and rational ideas and therefore appeals to Logos when he speaks that he killed Caesar because he “loved Rome more.”…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus said, “If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’ love to Caesar was no less than his.” (III.ii.18-20). This is the first incident where Shakespeare shows the internal conflicts of Brutus. Throughout the play, this…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus killed Caesar for Rome, for the common folk, they should be on his side because of this. After this the plebeians yell, “Live, Brutus, live, live!” (3.2.50). Now the Plebeians’ opinions have been completely switched after…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus is revealed to be a naive individual corrupted by his honourable beliefs and his wish to uphold his duty to the people. Through the use of diction, imagery and irony, Brutus repeatedly attempts to justify his planned assassination of Caesar believing it to be for the common good of Rome. Brutus is unable to understand nor recognize the faults of his plan due to his loyalty to the republic and unwavering determination. Brutus’ attempts to belittle his true motives to assassinate Caesar displays his wish to seem more honourable as well as his obliviousness to the true manipulative natures of his peers, such as Cassius.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus uses the phrase “I loved Caesar” in line 1555. His love for Caesar is gone considering he felt the need for murder, but at one time he did believe that Caesar was a great man and leader. This causes the audience to have mixed feelings of commitment and hatred toward Brutus and Caesar. Mark uses the double meaning of “honorable man” in line 1628.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And Brutus is an honorable man,"(3.2, Pages 3-4). Although the word before "Brutus" changes, the meaning of the phrase still has the same impact on the group gathered; they began to doubt what Brutus had said to them as it conflicted with what they had seen. If Caesar was ambitious, they reasoned, then why had he not taken the crown the first, second, or third time it was offered to him. They began to wonder, as Antony had undoubtedly wanted them to, if perhaps Brutus and Cassius were the ones who were ambitious for they had killed Caesar and told the public they wanted what was best for Rome, knowing that as they said this, the plebeians would wish them to become the new leaders. Mark Antony had the Romans see the metaphorical light he wanted them to see because it suited his purposes.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The two funeral speeches for Caesar At the art iii, the Caesar was killed by the conspiracy. Both of Antony and Brutus do the funeral speech with beautiful words for him, they have completely different standpoint, but I think that Antony’s speech make me find most convincing. From Brutus's speech, He said that tyranny is dead, if the Caesar become the lord, all of the Roman people will not get the freedom.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony was also a politician of Rome as well. Antony’s speech allowed the crowd to turn against the conspirators allow him to have the power and authority. Antony’s speech also corrupted an altercation with the village and enemies. After Antony’s speech was delivered to the citizens of Rome, the civil war immediately begun. Antony continues to say that was very loyal to Caesar as a friend and a dictator, Antony intends to flatter Brutus and to work upon those personal qualities of Brutus that represent moral strengths, but that are also fundamental weaknesses when dealing with a more generous and well-minded…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Julius Caesar, Brutus dives into the pretentious idea that Julius Caesar possesses an excess of negative attributes that hinder justice from occurring - attributes which he decides to reveal at the time of his speech. As an honorable figure in Rome, Brutus makes it specifically clear to everyone that for the good of Rome, Julius Caesar deserves "death for [the] ambition [he displays in the past]" (III.ii.1562). Although Brutus addresses many topics in his speech, the particular reason that he gives for killing Caesar essentially consists of serving justice for Rome, a statement which no one in the crowd dares disagree with. Taking this into account, Brutus 's starting statement of the essentiality of showing utmost loyalty towards a greater party or union instantly receives more support. To achieve even further results, after introducing the wrongs Caesar demonstrates as a leader, Brutus goes beyond accusations by attributing to his personal emotions as one who mourns for a dear friend yet still manages to remain loyal to his country.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, Antony refuses to read Caesar’s will in order denote that if they comprehended Caesar’s compassion towards the individuals of Rome, it would ultimately result in numerous…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays