Analysis Of Speech In Julius Caesar

Superior Essays
Two Speeches In Scene 1 of Act 3 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Julius Caesar was assassinated by the Roman Senators. At the time of the crime, Mark Antony was led away by Trebonius so he would not be able to interfere and aid Caesar. While this was occurring, the conspirators conversed in short, clipped, monosyllabic words as a result of their nervousness about the situation they had put themselves in. When the signal was given, they drew their swords and slew the ruler. Caesar, upon looking at the faces of the men surrounding him, found his 'friend ' Brutus among the traitors, and thus gave up the fight and died. After his return to the scene, Mark Antony requested he be able to speak to the people of Rome at Caesar 's funeral. Brutus …show more content…
With his words, he showed the people everything that was wrong with the way Caesar had ruled them. Brutus expressed that Caesar was ambitious and untrustworthy. He also declared that the deceased head of state was a tyrant who only cared for his own life and goals rather than about what was in the public 's interest and what was in line with the public 's goals. On the flip side of the coin, Mark Antony used the rhetorical device epimone to show that Caesar was not as ambitious as Brutus made him sound. ". . . Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man,"(3.2, Pages 3-4). Although the word before "Brutus" changes, the meaning of the phrase still has the same impact on the group gathered; they began to doubt what Brutus had said to them as it conflicted with what they had seen. If Caesar was ambitious, they reasoned, then why had he not taken the crown the first, second, or third time it was offered to him. They began to wonder, as Antony had undoubtedly wanted them to, if perhaps Brutus and Cassius were the ones who were ambitious for they had killed Caesar and told the public they wanted what was best for Rome, knowing that as they said this, the plebeians would wish them to become the new leaders. Mark Antony had the Romans see the metaphorical light he wanted them to see because it suited his purposes. Consequently, everything Brutus and Cassius had set into place was taken apart when Mark Antony covertly told the citizens under the guise of eulogizing Caesar, the wrongs that were done to him and them as his subjects. After both men speak, the outcome which was desired and received by both stays with Mark Antony, who later becomes part of the Second Triumvirate that ruled

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Suggested Score 80% Accept Suggested Score Manual Score: Manual Score Prompt Rubric | Checklist Two Julius Caesar Speeches Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” -Mahatma Gandhi. In this quote Gandhi is pointing out that by using violence, we destroy what little bit of humanity we have left. By using our words and not violence we get our point across not only in a more respectful manner but with less destruction after all.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s funeral speech about Caesar in Act Three demonstrates his own use of rhetoric irony with the help of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. To begin with, the conspirators and people of Rome could have delivered the message that resulted in his speech. Since the conspirators killed Caesar, Antony got the message that he should strike back. In Antony’s speech, his overall motive was pointing out the ambitions of the conspirators, not Caesar, achieving his goal of rousing the plebeians to riot and civil war. His strong use of ethos…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus delivers a speech defending his actions, and for the moment, the crowd is on his side. However, Mark Antony, with a subtle and eloquent speech, deftly turns public opinion against the assassins by manipulating the emotions of the common people. There is method in his rhetorical speech and gestures: he reminds them of the good Caesar had done for Rome, his sympathy with the poor, and his refusal of the crown at the Lupercal, thus questioning Brutus' claim of Caesar's ambition. He shows Caesar's corpse to the crowd to have them shed tears and gain sympathy for their fallen hero; and he reads Caesar's will, in which every Roman citizen would receive money. Antony rouses the mob to drive the conspirators from Rome.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Words are the knives that stab Caesar, each one coming at a different angle and with more force than the one before. If hit in the wrong place, one can kill, if not, one leaves them in pain and suffering. Throughout the play Julius Caesar, written by playwright William Shakespeare, friends and foes attain the forceful weapons of words. Following the assassination of the great ruler Julius Caesar, two well-respected men, Brutus and Antony, express the power of speech to gain the crowds affection during the funeral of the beloved Caesar. Brutus, a well respected Conspirator and Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar, avail rhetorical and literary devices, conveying different tones of persuasion and matter of fact against manipulation and melancholy…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens of Rome, do not lend me your ears, but instead lend me your heart. I stand before you on this tragic day to acknowledge the death of Marcus Brutus. Brutus, who was once the most respected, noble, and honorable man in all of Rome, now lies before us dead, more worthless than dust. Brutus was a stoic judge and the best friend of Julius Caesar, further demonstrating his high status and his nobility. His grievous death was caused by his dire desire for honor and his extraordinary view of idealism.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar Spring Final There are several occurrences that prove the theory that words are more powerful than weapons. In the play Julius Caesar a guy by the name of Marc Antony convinces a whole crowd of people to revolt against their leader. In Germany Hitler did a similar thing, he turned the people to his radical side. They used persuasive speech and gave the people offers that caused them to be loyal to them.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Battle of the Speeches According to John Morley, “Three things matter in a speech - who says it, how he says it, and what he says, and of the three, the latter matters the least.” John understancds that how the speaker presents himself and his ideas can change the side of the crowd, more than any word they could have said. When Brutus and Antony give their funeral speeches in Julius Caesar it is a critical moment for each. Both need to sway the crowd to agree with their perspective.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus Speech Analysis

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After Caesar’s death, in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the conspirators and Mark Antony speak to the public to explain what has happened to Caesar. Brutus, one of the main conspirators and Caesar’s best friend, talks first and gives the Romans the reason as to why Caesar had to be killed. Brutus’ speech is very convincing and he manipulates the crowd into believing him easily. After Brutus speaks, Mark Antony, Caesar’s good friend and second in command, gives a speech about Caesar and how he did not deserve to die, easily turning the crowd against Brutus and the other conspirators. Both speeches use persuasive techniques, like ethos, and rhetorical devices, like repetition and rhetorical questions, to manipulate their audiences…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays