Brutus And Antony's Speech Analysis

Good Essays
The play “Julius Caesar” explained two men named Brutus and Antony who both presented speeches in front of their town with different meanings about the assassination of Caesar. Antony had to ask Brutus for permission to speak at Caesar’s funeral. His despairing emotion and speech drawed the crowds special attention. Antony speech does not show any praise of caesar but does show sympathy and memorable memories that caesar did for his town. This whole situation sums a complete catastrophe. If Caesar was still living he would not allow the citizens of his village have freedom and be enslaved. Antony’s speech was more effective because it gave a positive meaning to the citizens. He begin to express his emotions about Caesar and his thoughts …show more content…
Antony showed remorse and a bit of happiness saying his speech at Caesar’s funeral. Happiness came from him describing his Captain (Caesar) as a person. Reciting memories and good times they shared. Although, he didn’t praise Caesar is his speech as he reminded the crowd in his speech “I came to bury Caesar, not praise him.” Antony still shows he loves Caesar by saying “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.” Antony was also a politician of Rome as well. Antony’s speech allowed the crowd to turn against the conspirators allow him to have the power and authority. Antony’s speech also corrupted an altercation with the village and enemies. After Antony’s speech was delivered to the citizens of Rome, the civil war immediately begun. Antony continues to say that was very loyal to Caesar as a friend and a dictator, Antony intends to flatter Brutus and to work upon those personal qualities of Brutus that represent moral strengths, but that are also fundamental weaknesses when dealing with a more generous and well-minded …show more content…
Before Antony’s speech, the crowd calls the deceased Caesars names and acknowledge Brutus as if he was their savior. Brutus ask the crowding a very common-sensed question whether if they didn’t loved Rome and freedom, majority of the crowd answered no. Immediately after the crowd answered the risky question Caesar had to be immediately killed. What Antony did for his own good and maybe others explained that he is a calm man who allows common sense to answer his questions and others as well. Antony does not seek action with resisting Caesar’s murder but his words spoke a bit louder if he were to act on the situation. Brutus is of course a “good man of Rome” but the decisions he chooses and ideas that come to his mind aren’t as reasonable and necessary as

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Do grace to Caesar’s corpse, and grace his speech…”(III,ii,50-52). Here Brutus is convincing the people to listen to Antony talk about Caesar for his funeral. This is a costly mistake because Brutus just convinced the crowd that his actions were justified and that he killed Caesar for the greater good. The people now dislike Caesar and are…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout this part of his funeral speech, Antony is now throwing the word honorable around like it is a word that is used on anyone. He is saying that he should do something to Brutus and Cassius for killing Caesar, but they are honorable men so he will not. By doing this, Antony is showing the people that what Brutus and…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He truly believed that Caesar would have become a tyrant, because of that Brutus put his country before his friends and even his family to join the conspiracy to kill Caesar. Even though Caesar was his friend, Brutus ' loyalty as a Roman citizen came first. Brutus ' tragic flaw is that he is not a very good judge of character, and he trusts Cassius too much. He also underestimates Marc Antony and allows him to speak to the crowd after Caesar 's death. Although Antony does as promised in that he does not say anything against the conspirators, his use of verbal irony and dramatic actions turns the crowd into an angry mob.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    His goal was to create a mob mentality, and he succeeded in this because of his speech. He turned the Romans against the conspirators, resulting in a rebellion. This led Mark to gain the general appeal, and therefore overall power and authority. To achieve this, he presented the audience stab wounds in Caesar’s body, and manipulated the emotions of the people to benefit only himself in the end. This is a very ironic goal, given the reasoning for the assassination of Caesar (tyranny).…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Antony uses rhetorical devices and conveys to the plebeian’s emotions to get them thinking and on his side. Antony changes the people of Rome view of Caesar being a tyrant to a hero and big-hearted ruler, who was accused of wrongdoing. Through the use of repetition of key words in contexts that reverse their meaning, through phrasing that suggests that Brutus is wrong and through theatrical gestures, Mark Antony sways the crowd to his position. Antony cleverly repeats key words, using them to suggest the opposite of their actual meanings. The words “honorable” and “noble” initially show approval of Brutus, but result in his condemnation.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Antony’s main point was that he wasn’t a ruler, and that everyone loved Caesar moments before and then after Brutus spoke they all suddenly forget about Caesar remarkable traits; that they turned there backs on Caesar for no good reason at all? Antony won logos by appealing to the crowd by making them rethink why they were mad at Caesar, and redirecting their anger at Brutus. Mark Antony won over the crowd through his exceptional choice of words usage of verbal irony, pathos, and logos. Even though he had the advantage of speaking after Brutus he knew exactly what to say in order to get the citizens of Rome on his side. All the while Brutus ran away silently admitting…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This statement rallys even more support from the crowd because it illuminates Antony is only trying to do what is morally correct in this tragic situation which in turn further dwindles the belief that Brutus did the right thing.Additionally, Antony loads his speech with emotional appeal to personalize with his listeners and to upset them about Caesar’s death which previously they had supported because of Brutus’s speech. In the opening of his eulogy, Antony address the audience as “Friends, Romans, and countrymen” which creates a sense of trust and companionship between himself and the fickle citizens listening on (III.ii.1617). By opening his speech with this…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After Brutus’ speech the crowd supports his decision, they believe Caesar was corrupt and he had to die. Next Marc Antony, Julius Caesar’s right hand man, stepped up to talk. In his speech he used pathos to pull at the crowd’s emotions and logos to remind them why they loved Caesar. “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” Antony says, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome… When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.” (III.2.94,97,100). Antony’s use of pathos, saying how good of a friend Caesar was and how much he cared for his people, and logos, recalling the times he saved prisoners and brought them home, sways the idea that killing Caesar was actually for the good of Rome.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are many great examples of this throughout the entirety of the play. Almost every decision Marcus Brutus makes during the play has an affect on him later on. For example, when he has the opportunity to kill Antony along with Caesar, he doesn’t seize it. Brutus said, “ For antony is but a lim of Caesar, let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers… and in the spirit of men there is no blood.” (II.i.165-168). He makes another choice that has a negative outcome, Brutus decides to let Antony speak at the funeral for Caesar.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays