Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
Words are the knives that stab Caesar, each one coming at a different angle and with more force than the one before. If hit in the wrong place, one can kill, if not, one leaves them in pain and suffering. Throughout the play Julius Caesar, written by playwright William Shakespeare, friends and foes attain the forceful weapons of words. Following the assassination of the great ruler Julius Caesar, two well-respected men, Brutus and Antony, express the power of speech to gain the crowds affection during the funeral of the beloved Caesar. Brutus, a well respected Conspirator and Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar, avail rhetorical and literary devices, conveying different tones of persuasion and matter of fact against manipulation and melancholy …show more content…
While justifying his reasons for the speech, that he “[isn’t speaking] to disprove what Brutus spoke” but rather “speaks what he knows,” Antony uses verbal irony. The statement contains irony because he says that he speaks not to disprove Brutus, however he did the opposite by the claims against the Conspirators. Using the irony as bait to draw in the citizens, Antony builds on his tone of manipulation. The irony makes him appear as a good guy, that does not speak out against others, so the people respect him differently. He manipulates them into listening to the rest of the words he must say. Similarly to Brutus, Antony also “[pauses] until it comes back to [him]” as a form of a dramatic pause. By pausing in the middle of the speech to turn around and weep, the audience feels sorrow for him because he loses a beloved friend. This adds to his other tone of melancholy because when he turns around, he sets the scene of sadness and the audience reacts by pitying him. When he gets such a reaction from the audience, Antony continues to manipulate with his melancholy tone. He uses personification as a final device. The “sweet Caesar’s wounds” become personified to “poor dumb mouths” as he shows the crowd the 23 stab wounds. The wounds he believes should speak as though they are a mouth, like the people should feel sorry for Caesar by looking at what happened to him. This conveys both melancholy and manipulation. The stabbing and adding selective words like sweet next to Caesar coincide with the melancholy tone; however he also manipulates them in the same way by making them turn against the Conspirators. At the end of the speech, the rebellion starts against the Conspirators, proving that Antony won Rome over. Antony uses the devices of verbal irony, a dramatic pause and personification to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Antony presents a tone of sincerity and relative agreement with the conspirators: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (). However, as his oration progresses, so too does the tone toward a more dramatic categorization. While Antony prepares to read Caesar’s will to the Roman citizens, he indicates the specific wounds inflicted by Cassius and Brutus: “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through... Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (). As a plebeian shouts, “O traitors, villains!”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetoric, it’s all around us whether we realize it or not. In Act Three of Julius Caesar, Caesar moves to the capitol after refusing Artemidorus’ letter of warning. Shortly after, the conspirators (people who were planning to kill Caesar) stab him to death. Antony flees the scene but Brutus convinces everybody to let him live. Brutus then explains to the people of Rome the meaning of why they had killed Caesar, but what Brutus, the conspirators, and people of Rome don’t know, is that Antony is pretending to be an ally but in reality, plans on striking back with the help of Octavius Caesar.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors arms, Quite vanquished him. Then burst his mighty heart." (III:ii:171-180) He is making the commoners visualize what happened and allowing them to feel the emotional pain Caesar felt when he seen Brutus stab…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech ultimately leads to a battle between him and the conspirators. Brutus has good intentions, but nevertheless he makes a lot of bad decisions which eventually leads to his…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Julius Caesar

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The historical play, “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespeare illustrates the problems of leadership that commence after the assassination of the Roman dictator, Julius Caesar. The play has a thorough use of rhetorical devices and was a powerful persuasion tool during the whole of the show. This literary device is extensively used during the funeral scene in Act three, Scene two where Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony give their speeches about Caesar's death. In their funeral speeches, while Marcus Brutus delivered a logical speech, Mark Antony overall wins the crowd through his use of ethics and empathy. Antony’s speech left such a lasting impact due his skillful use of Pathos.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony delivered a more effective speech than Brutus by using many rhetorical devices including irony, pathos, . By making his speech emotional and manipulative, Antony convinces the people of Rome to avenge Caesar's death with him. In their speeches, both Brutus and Antony use irony to appeal to the people’s emotions and convince them of different beliefs. One example of irony in Brutus’s speech is in the lines “Who is here so vile…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus only aims to be heard, not to be loved, however Antony wants acceptance, and passion for his cause. As Mark Antony receives the crowds acceptance, he also attempts to receive acceptance from his ‘friends’ on Caesar’s behalf. Antony uses pathos once again when trying to convince the people of how much love Caesar had for them. He states on Line 91 of Scene ii “when that the poor hath cried, Caesar hath wept” (III). Antony’s vigorous use of the word ‘wept’ reiterates Caesar’s deep care for his people.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this example, emotion is used to create a persuasive argument with the people of Rome. Antony uses pathos throughout his speech in act III. “Bear with me, my heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me” (Act III. scene ii. lines 102-104). Here Antony is prompting the audience to feel empathetic toward him.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain, Antony finally returned to the topic of the will. The only reason he got off the topic was so that he had time to talk about the conspirators in a negative way. This quote shows how in the next couple lines, Antony will read Caesar’s will to the crowd, saying that they have gained seventy five drachmas and Caesar’s private arbors. The persuasive technique of Pathos was used here as well because this shows that Caesar considered the people of Rome family, which made them very emotional and excited because being family with Caesar meant so much to them. By showing the common people of Rome Caesar’s will, Antony created a whirlwind of emotions throughout the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He convinces the crowd that Caesar was great. The crowd would feel guilty about trusting Brutus, after Antony persuaded them he was almost pathetic, this makes the crowd angry and they rebel. Antony also says "Here was Caesar! When comes such another?" which makes the citizens feel guilty and like they'll never get another Caesar, so they have missed there chance to let Caesar…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Then he declares how when Brutus stabbed Caesar, it was not the knife that ended Caesar 's life. It was Brutus 's betrayal. Antony throws caution to the wind, going as far as to call Brutus a dishonourable traitor. What he does is deflate the conspirators as he fills Caesar up. To illustrate how much the people had depended on Caesar, Antony says, "Great Caeasr fell.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays